Re: [patch V2 01/11] hrtimer: Provide hrtimer_start_range_ns_user()

[Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>]

On Wed, Apr 08, 2026 at 01:53:46PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> +enum {
> +	HRTIMER_REPROGRAM_NONE,
> +	HRTIMER_REPROGRAM,
> +	HRTIMER_REPROGRAM_FORCE,
> +};
> +
>  static bool __hrtimer_start_range_ns(struct hrtimer *timer, ktime_t tim, u64 delta_ns,
>  				     const enum hrtimer_mode mode, struct hrtimer_clock_base *base)

The return type for this function needs to changed from bool to
enum whatever...  Otherwise HRTIMER_REPROGRAM and HRTIMER_REPROGRAM_FORCE
are both just true.

>  {
> @@ -1410,7 +1416,7 @@ static bool __hrtimer_start_range_ns(str
>  	/* If a deferred rearm is pending skip reprogramming the device */
>  	if (cpu_base->deferred_rearm) {
>  		cpu_base->deferred_needs_update = true;
> -		return false;
> +		return HRTIMER_REPROGRAM_NONE;
>  	}
>  
>  	if (!was_first || cpu_base != this_cpu_base) {
> @@ -1423,7 +1429,7 @@ static bool __hrtimer_start_range_ns(str
>  		 * callbacks.
>  		 */
>  		if (likely(hrtimer_base_is_online(this_cpu_base)))
> -			return first;
> +			return first ? HRTIMER_REPROGRAM : HRTIMER_REPROGRAM_NONE;

regards,
dan carpenter