From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>,
Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Sashiko@localhost.localdomain,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@nvidia.com>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>,
Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>,
"Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)" <chleroy@kernel.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
Kieran Bingham <kbingham@kernel.org>,
Xin Zhao <jackzxcui1989@163.com>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/15 v4] tick/sched: Refactor idle cputime accounting
Date: Tue, 26 May 2026 12:42:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ahV5CFMvMEKtuVct@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260508131647.43868-1-frederic@kernel.org>
Hi,
I don't see any further concern. What should we do with this? It could
either go through the scheduler tree or the timer tree.
Thanks.
Le Fri, May 08, 2026 at 03:16:32PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> After the issue reported here:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251210083135.3993562-1-jackzxcui1989@163.com/
>
> It occurs that the idle cputime accounting is a big mess that
> accumulates within two concurrent statistics, each having their own
> shortcomings:
>
> * The accounting for online CPUs which is based on the delta between
> tick_nohz_start_idle() and tick_nohz_stop_idle().
>
> Pros:
> - Works when the tick is off
>
> - Has nsecs granularity
>
> Cons:
> - Account idle steal time but doesn't substract it from idle
> cputime.
>
> - Assumes CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING by not accounting IRQs but
> the IRQ time is simply ignored when
> CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING=n
>
> - The windows between 1) idle task scheduling and the first call
> to tick_nohz_start_idle() and 2) idle task between the last
> tick_nohz_stop_idle() and the rest of the idle time are
> blindspots wrt. cputime accounting (though mostly insignificant
> amount)
>
> - Relies on private fields outside of kernel stats, with specific
> accessors.
>
> * The accounting for offline CPUs which is based on ticks and the
> jiffies delta during which the tick was stopped.
>
> Pros:
> - Handles steal time correctly
>
> - Handle CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING=y and
> CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING=n correctly.
>
> - Handles the whole idle task
>
> - Accounts directly to kernel stats, without midlayer accumulator.
>
> Cons:
> - Doesn't elapse when the tick is off, which doesn't make it
> suitable for online CPUs.
>
> - Has TICK_NSEC granularity (jiffies)
>
> - Needs to track the dyntick-idle ticks that were accounted and
> substract them from the total jiffies time spent while the tick
> was stopped. This is an ugly workaround.
>
> Having two different accounting for a single context is not the only
> problem: since those accountings are of different natures, it is
> possible to observe the global idle time going backward after a CPU goes
> offline, as reported by Xin Zhao.
>
> Clean up the situation with introducing a hybrid approach that stays
> coherent, fixes the backward jumps and works for both online and offline
> CPUs:
>
> * Tick based or native vtime accounting operate before the tick is
> stopped and resumes once the tick is restarted.
>
> * When the idle loop starts, switch to dynticks-idle accounting as is
> done currently, except that the statistics accumulate directly to the
> relevant kernel stat fields.
>
> * Private dyntick cputime accounting fields are removed.
>
> * Works on both online and offline case.
>
> * Move most of the relevant code to the common sched/cputime subsystem
>
> * Handle CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING=n correctly such that the
> dynticks-idle accounting still elapses while on IRQs.
>
> * Correctly substract idle steal cputime from idle time
>
> Changes since v3 (among which a lot of relevant reviews from Sashiko):
>
> - Add new tags
>
> - Rebase on latest -rc1
>
> - Add "tick/sched: Fix TOCTOU in nohz idle time fetch" (Sashiko)
>
> - Fix buggy state refetch in kcpustat_cpu_fetch_vtime() (Sashiko)
>
> - Fix build issue on powerpc (Christophe Leroy)
>
> - Fix s390 lost steal time occuring on idle IRQs (call vtime_flush() on
> vtime_account_hardirq() and vtime_account_softirq()) (Sashiko)
>
> - Fix build issue on s390
>
> - Fix uninitialized idle_sleeptime_seq (Sashiko)
>
> - Fix irqtime being disabled or enabled in the middle of an idle IRQ
> (Sashiko)
>
> - Fix tick restart and then restop in the same idle loop (Sashiko)
>
> - Fix "sched/cputime: Handle idle irqtime gracefully" changelog (Sashiko)
>
> - Fix idle steal time substracted from the wrong index between idle and
> iowait kcpustat. (Sashiko)
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/frederic/linux-dynticks.git
> timers/core-v4
>
> HEAD: e64ba052ce04e363ff76d3cb8bedc5f812188acb
> Thanks,
> Frederic
> ---
>
> Frederic Weisbecker (15):
> tick/sched: Fix TOCTOU in nohz idle time fetch
> sched/idle: Handle offlining first in idle loop
> sched/cputime: Remove superfluous and error prone kcpustat_field() parameter
> sched/cputime: Correctly support generic vtime idle time
> powerpc/time: Prepare to stop elapsing in dynticks-idle
> s390/time: Prepare to stop elapsing in dynticks-idle
> tick/sched: Unify idle cputime accounting
> tick/sched: Remove nohz disabled special case in cputime fetch
> tick/sched: Move dyntick-idle cputime accounting to cputime code
> tick/sched: Remove unused fields
> tick/sched: Account tickless idle cputime only when tick is stopped
> tick/sched: Consolidate idle time fetching APIs
> sched/cputime: Provide get_cpu_[idle|iowait]_time_us() off-case
> sched/cputime: Handle idle irqtime gracefully
> sched/cputime: Handle dyntick-idle steal time correctly
>
> arch/powerpc/kernel/time.c | 41 +++++
> arch/s390/include/asm/idle.h | 2 +
> arch/s390/kernel/idle.c | 5 +-
> arch/s390/kernel/vtime.c | 75 ++++++++-
> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 29 +---
> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c | 6 +-
> drivers/macintosh/rack-meter.c | 2 +-
> fs/proc/stat.c | 40 +----
> fs/proc/uptime.c | 8 +-
> include/linux/kernel_stat.h | 76 +++++++--
> include/linux/tick.h | 4 -
> include/linux/vtime.h | 22 ++-
> kernel/rcu/tree.c | 9 +-
> kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h | 7 +-
> kernel/sched/core.c | 6 +-
> kernel/sched/cputime.c | 308 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> kernel/sched/idle.c | 13 +-
> kernel/time/tick-sched.c | 212 ++++++-------------------
> kernel/time/tick-sched.h | 12 --
> kernel/time/timer_list.c | 6 +-
> scripts/gdb/linux/timerlist.py | 4 -
> 21 files changed, 529 insertions(+), 358 deletions(-)
--
Frederic Weisbecker
SUSE Labs
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-26 10:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-08 13:16 [PATCH 00/15 v4] tick/sched: Refactor idle cputime accounting Frederic Weisbecker
2026-05-08 13:16 ` [PATCH 01/15] tick/sched: Fix TOCTOU in nohz idle time fetch Frederic Weisbecker
2026-05-08 13:16 ` [PATCH 02/15] sched/idle: Handle offlining first in idle loop Frederic Weisbecker
2026-05-08 13:16 ` [PATCH 03/15] sched/cputime: Remove superfluous and error prone kcpustat_field() parameter Frederic Weisbecker
2026-05-08 13:16 ` [PATCH 04/15] sched/cputime: Correctly support generic vtime idle time Frederic Weisbecker
2026-05-08 13:16 ` [PATCH 05/15] powerpc/time: Prepare to stop elapsing in dynticks-idle Frederic Weisbecker
2026-05-08 13:16 ` [PATCH 06/15] s390/time: " Frederic Weisbecker
2026-05-08 13:16 ` [PATCH 07/15] tick/sched: Unify idle cputime accounting Frederic Weisbecker
2026-05-08 13:16 ` [PATCH 08/15] tick/sched: Remove nohz disabled special case in cputime fetch Frederic Weisbecker
2026-05-08 13:16 ` [PATCH 09/15] tick/sched: Move dyntick-idle cputime accounting to cputime code Frederic Weisbecker
2026-05-08 13:16 ` [PATCH 10/15] tick/sched: Remove unused fields Frederic Weisbecker
2026-05-08 13:16 ` [PATCH 11/15] tick/sched: Account tickless idle cputime only when tick is stopped Frederic Weisbecker
2026-05-08 13:16 ` [PATCH 12/15] tick/sched: Consolidate idle time fetching APIs Frederic Weisbecker
2026-05-08 13:16 ` [PATCH 13/15] sched/cputime: Provide get_cpu_[idle|iowait]_time_us() off-case Frederic Weisbecker
2026-05-08 13:16 ` [PATCH 14/15] sched/cputime: Handle idle irqtime gracefully Frederic Weisbecker
2026-05-08 13:16 ` [PATCH 15/15] sched/cputime: Handle dyntick-idle steal time correctly Frederic Weisbecker
2026-05-26 10:42 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ahV5CFMvMEKtuVct@localhost.localdomain \
--to=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=Sashiko@localhost.localdomain \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=anna-maria@linutronix.de \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=chleroy@kernel.org \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jackzxcui1989@163.com \
--cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=joelagnelf@nvidia.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kbingham@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox