From: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
To: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com>
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, sumitg@nvidia.com,
pierre.gondois@arm.com, zhenglifeng1@huawei.com,
zhanjie9@hisilicon.com, viresh.kumar@linaro.org,
rafael@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: cppc: Reduce cppc delivered perf sampling jitter
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2026 02:42:10 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aiFHsZ_Ha1DKIm8N@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260602212052.1278365-1-jeremy.linton@arm.com>
On Tue, Jun 02, 2026 at 04:20:52PM -0500, Jeremy Linton wrote:
> CPPC uses a pair of registers cycling at different frequencies to
> determine an accumulated performance level. For userspace reporting we
> want to convert this to an instantaneous CPU frequency, but over short
> time periods small errors caused by CPPC counter reads can cause
> fairly significant reported frequency variations even when the core
> CPU clock isn't changing.
>
> Reduce this by keeping a start sample fixed and retrying the end
> sample until the counter deltas are large enough to reduce short
> window error, or until adjacent delivered performance estimates are
> within the CPU's observed CPPC read noise floor.
>
> To begin, resample the initial pair a small fixed number of times
> looking for matching delivered performance deltas. This reduces the
> chance that a disturbed start sample anchors the rest of the
> calculation.
>
> Then look for an end sample while updating the noise floor from the
> best error seen between samples. The floor remains zero on systems
> with stable feedback reads, but lets noisy systems stop early once
> another retry is unlikely to improve the result. The retry loop is
> capped at 200 iterations, giving an ~20 usec explicit delay budget
> derived from ndelay(100).
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com>
Tested-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
I've tested this on my grace host, checking "cat
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/cpuinfo_cur_freq" thousand times,
and the result is quite good, reducing the Std Dev by 5x, and getting
a better value.
# cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/cpuinfo_max_freq
3339000
Baseline:
Average: 3505050.00
P50 (Median): 3388500.00
Std Dev: 462607.66
Min: 2709000.00
Max: 4464000.00
Wth this patch:
Average: 2393550.00
P50 (Median): 2394000.00
Std Dev: 68629.06
Min: 2241000.00
Max: 2529000.00
Thanks,
--breno
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-04 9:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-02 21:20 [PATCH] cpufreq: cppc: Reduce cppc delivered perf sampling jitter Jeremy Linton
2026-06-03 10:54 ` Breno Leitao
2026-06-03 16:46 ` Jeremy Linton
2026-06-04 8:12 ` Breno Leitao
2026-06-04 9:42 ` Breno Leitao [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aiFHsZ_Ha1DKIm8N@gmail.com \
--to=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=jeremy.linton@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pierre.gondois@arm.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=sumitg@nvidia.com \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=zhanjie9@hisilicon.com \
--cc=zhenglifeng1@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox