From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D0FA4963A8; Fri, 5 Jun 2026 08:46:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1780649211; cv=none; b=iNqp/XW7qJ7Q3lssh8Qk/jiGNGjmDRslMThJ6DWX0VHa7bXA85BHQ9Cmf4EpX3iEYHsvM1IoWGxdLefIcm8KP+Bv1Va8M/aPiwVtq9YP8GCRIpdxRy6eqa26hO8/6/gRccSVX66gBUlIuDQIFbhqU3Ir8zUIJ8//v69V4jB5TdE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1780649211; c=relaxed/simple; bh=h5Teg7Wkye+9/VHOc09vDQfFBBnMWuMpISWI3uDCqKM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=ojViCERTFttGk1m6J2vukevLkXyoHzYfkvETOeEeYtUFHi5NFQi+Kx6KJ73iHHbd7ArT+y5+eVoR0O1COKfXhNK4/4HxuAPTB/7PM5Bt6NGTAIcB+nmzd0VhP4+9Qkln5eLTYB7OAQD7SEzmuGvdadnMPajTMyYtnj7jxUGzS0Y= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=ZKzdRkuB; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="ZKzdRkuB" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 810B41F00893; Fri, 5 Jun 2026 08:46:43 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1780649207; bh=sTiCLUcDNVs3jG8PMviVhw4RKeHL/1qP/MhRnZu7xBA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=ZKzdRkuBPxY6cJEVwPyljO720DWyyF+WZPEP5rWwC+Xuu25sPUZOnZ4JGsDdBA2a4 xd/RVVQ1aTG9zMUTQJ6enwtaQhYnuHWoKihI4ctV0KMtVFxHfCvSHKGzuqlEUEARFm ugWbklubBEIH86rUT7XSOfzc/LfX+3TJrHHoFhpUYLtnBKFJ9wui2LWgR0aIFOwlo9 rrjqLcT9UwzT8rULdD4gQg0Yi8h9KIGDh1OmkrSrDsAJL1YmU5Knh4y6AHsF1dNt5i SCVW9KCLCnl9+HNCkNHXq0ztVCKdT786DdBDT3HvcbEZice7P7aRkzir+ZlnaCa9TG 1oJCDX9KVsLRQ== Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2026 10:46:41 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Juergen Gross Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen , "H. Peter Anvin" , Huang Rui , Mario Limonciello , Perry Yuan , K Prateek Nayak , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Viresh Kumar , Srinivas Pandruvada , Len Brown , Hans de Goede , Ilpo =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=E4rvinen?= Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] x86/msr: Switch all callers of wrmsrq_on_cpu() to use wrmsr_on_cpu() Message-ID: References: <20260605070826.2995913-1-jgross@suse.com> <20260605070826.2995913-5-jgross@suse.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260605070826.2995913-5-jgross@suse.com> * Juergen Gross wrote: > Now that wrmsr_on_cpu() has the same interface as wrmsrq_on_cpu(), the > callers of wrmsrq_on_cpu() can be switched to wrmsr_on_cpu() and > wrmsrq_on_cpu() can be removed. Similarly to the other patches, this should be split into two as well. Thanks, Ingo