From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB3AD3CCFCF; Fri, 5 Jun 2026 08:44:36 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1780649077; cv=none; b=Ey8fkfrerT82NIXmL2DINqscoulc6a+pd6CTXZAp4ex/e+TTny1Mo9C/Qr2uxOSIzzHJshjeeX5BhwLy5XAJbd4+4LbvnQ4u6AFubPrdRWMFe7EYqsdvdyvx/TlHrA4KYQ/bf72UgZSTsiV5CGSR6B4hiuJoAt7kqhWW+ybuhNI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1780649077; c=relaxed/simple; bh=LrvExHeszfpU1ByAWylPdyV4ejnYrr0R2k/TkUfeNII=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Mk28Db2ubP4LWRbQQfnRYPs0Taa8Nc3m03C3FWFwNryG+gcP0bjG/LqGDxyvyI/hB9hSnoQ/ygvLgotr7nSlVC0UEJSj+ZBe71q1gSH9m4UUx87gJLMIpzheFvRFMnJD6Qrhkrmxl7UhPcAjszLiZR2Xuy+ia2IgZry4Aceblgk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=T+9Tz8LC; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="T+9Tz8LC" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9717A1F00898; Fri, 5 Jun 2026 08:44:33 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1780649076; bh=74Rfk+yVMTJe1DhjbNVT4f66L3XVI70CTDaqI4Gfif8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=T+9Tz8LCFNlh5SPy7jiupYEuJr2f2gTxy6ugozL9iShrTXO7NHYNogiEaeyhmm9RF MIB+dxdvmLIJhhywiQFKHLuNdEblt937TxU+tcybqLp5vmJ3zdoFsvAiQ1zVoTb8xX T6xx/0sy4LICeFvaPtX10WPQaZwO5GtyHvwSEa3sQdiAaqOuxPWliYGOozEca7IqyJ 0HNWYWVGmqi3J0ZNgbnvzTfLOUfv84p7EVR0/CibBbuCo8BplmP9kVfkCVHquuughB hki2bHNHnRmZA+QxKERJG/rCkJ7f8lV1RIYMtZuAtMDpVEDIiYEFwCZ7sWevs398Of nP3id1unJXA+A== Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2026 10:44:31 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Juergen Gross Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen , "H. Peter Anvin" , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Daniel Lezcano , Zhang Rui , Lukasz Luba Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] x86/msr: Switch wrmsr_safe_on_cpu() to use a 64-bit quantity Message-ID: References: <20260605070826.2995913-1-jgross@suse.com> <20260605070826.2995913-8-jgross@suse.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260605070826.2995913-8-jgross@suse.com> * Juergen Gross wrote: > In order to prepare retiring wrmsrq_safe_on_cpu() switch > wrmsr_safe_on_cpu() to have the same interface as wrmsrq_safe_on_cpu(). This should be patch #1. > Switch all wrmsr_safe_on_cpu() callers to use the new interface. This should be patch #2. Thanks, Ingo