From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] powercap/rapl: reduce ipi calls Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 22:50:54 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: References: <1455914253-18138-1-git-send-email-jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com> <1455914253-18138-3-git-send-email-jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1455914253-18138-3-git-send-email-jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Jacob Pan Cc: LKML , Rafael Wysocki , Linux PM , Srinivas Pandruvada , Peter Zijlstra , "David S. Miller" , Andrew Morton , Rusty Russell List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 19 Feb 2016, Jacob Pan wrote: > @@ -1380,6 +1375,7 @@ static int rapl_detect_topology(void) > int i; > int phy_package_id; > struct rapl_package *new_package, *rp; > + int lead_cpu; > > for_each_online_cpu(i) { > phy_package_id = topology_physical_package_id(i); > @@ -1392,7 +1388,11 @@ static int rapl_detect_topology(void) > /* add the new package to the list */ > new_package->id = phy_package_id; > new_package->nr_cpus = 1; > - > + /* find the first active cpu of the package */ > + lead_cpu = cpumask_any_and(topology_core_cpumask(i), > + cpumask_of(i)); Yuck. Why any_and? The result is i, simply because i is online otherwise you would not be there. > + if (lead_cpu < nr_cpu_ids) > + new_package->lead_cpu = lead_cpu; So the above is identical to new_package->lead_cpu = lead_cpu; Hmm? > @@ -1500,6 +1503,15 @@ static int rapl_cpu_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb, > break; > if (--rp->nr_cpus == 0) > rapl_remove_package(rp); > + else if (cpu == rp->lead_cpu) { > + /* choose another active cpu in the package */ > + lead_cpu = cpumask_any_but(topology_core_cpumask(cpu), cpu); This part is correct. Thanks, tglx