From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 2/2] power/idle: enhance the precision of sleep_length Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 10:18:11 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: References: <1466154816-17900-1-git-send-email-zhaoyang.huang@spreadtrum.com> <1466154816-17900-2-git-send-email-zhaoyang.huang@spreadtrum.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: Received: from www.linutronix.de ([62.245.132.108]:46634 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750890AbcFWIUU (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Jun 2016 04:20:20 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: Zhaoyang Huang Cc: Daniel Lezcano , Geng Ren , Alex Wang , Vincent Guittot , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, =?GB2312?Q?Zhaoyang_Huang_=28=BB=C6=B3=AF=D1=F4=29?= On Thu, 23 Jun 2016, Zhaoyang Huang wrote: > On 23 June 2016 at 15:01, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > Thomas, I agree with you, I have discussed the modification with the > call back owner. However, I wonder if we can make the idle's framework > to be more precised without the assumption of short CPU_PM_ENTER > callbacks. Thank you! What's the point? To help people who put insanities into the idle code path? Thanks, tglx