From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Julia Lawall Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] bq27xxx_battery data memory update Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 07:33:33 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: References: <20170824033617.20840-1-liam@networkimprov.net> <20170829105413.6wbejdaxxxd6hk7b@earth> <0bf4ba2f-18f9-1204-8241-8acb6ac6f490@ti.com> <20170829212259.gs4bljwscrprsfjl@earth> <20170830002939.ns43wldvffmwqhuv@earth> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr ([192.134.164.83]:27279 "EHLO mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750732AbdIRFdf (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Sep 2017 01:33:35 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: Liam Breck Cc: Julia Lawall , Sebastian Reichel , Gilles Muller , Nicolas Palix , Michal Marek , cocci@systeme.lip6.fr, "Andrew F. Davis" , =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Pali_Roh=E1r?= , Linux PM mailing list On Sun, 17 Sep 2017, Liam Breck wrote: > Hi Julia, checking back... Hi, I have something that works in terms of the names of the macros. Ie if there is #define XXX 12 and #define YYY 12 it doesn't know that XXX and YYY are the same thing. I haven't posted it because I needed to make a change to the parser of Coccinelle and Coccinelle is a bit unstable at the moment. But things should converge soon. julia > > > > On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 1:14 PM, Julia Lawall wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, 5 Sep 2017, Liam Breck wrote: > > > >> Hi Julia, any luck on this? > > > > I was trying to improve the parser, but it seems that my improvements > > don't have a sufficient effect so I will try your suggestion of just > > seding out the offending code. > > > > julia > > > >> > >> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 4:43 AM, Liam Breck wrote: > >> > On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 4:33 AM, Julia Lawall wrote: > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> On Thu, 31 Aug 2017, Liam Breck wrote: > >> >> > >> >>> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 2:54 AM, Julia Lawall wrote: > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > On Tue, 29 Aug 2017, Liam Breck wrote: > >> >>> > > >> >>> >> Coccinelle folks, > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 5:29 PM, Sebastian Reichel > >> >>> >> wrote: > >> >>> >> > Hi, > >> >>> >> > > >> >>> >> > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 04:07:12PM -0700, Liam Breck wrote: > >> >>> >> >> I don't see a Julia in CC list... > >> >>> >> > > >> >>> >> > <_< let's try that again. > >> >>> >> > > >> >>> >> >> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 2:22 PM, Sebastian Reichel > >> >>> >> >> wrote: > >> >>> >> >> > [adding Julia to Cc for Coccinelle question] > >> >>> >> >> > > >> >>> >> >> > Hi, > >> >>> >> >> > > >> >>> >> >> > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 10:31:57AM -0500, Andrew F. Davis wrote: > >> >>> >> >> >> On 08/29/2017 05:54 AM, Sebastian Reichel wrote: > >> >>> >> >> >> > On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 08:36:12PM -0700, Liam Breck wrote: > >> >>> >> >> >> >> Overview: > >> >>> >> >> >> >> * Reorganizes chip data definitions > >> >>> >> >> >> >> * Enables features landed in these patches: > >> >>> >> >> >> >> dt-bindings: power: supply: bq27xxx: Add monitored-battery documentation > >> >>> >> >> >> >> power: supply: bq27xxx: Add chip data memory read/write support > >> >>> >> >> >> >> power: supply: bq27xxx: Add power_supply_battery_info support > >> >>> >> >> >> >> * Supports the following chips (only BQ27425 is active) > >> >>> >> >> >> >> BQ27500, 545, 425, 421, 441, 621 > >> >>> >> >> >> >> > >> >>> >> >> >> >> Changes in v3: > >> >>> >> >> >> >> * BQ27425 tested; workaround minor chip bug > >> >>> >> >> >> >> * Dropped driver_version > >> >>> >> >> >> >> * Fixed dbg_dupes logic for .props & .dm_regs > >> >>> >> >> >> >> * Dropped two props array dupes > >> >>> >> >> >> >> > >> >>> >> >> >> >> Changes in v2: > >> >>> >> >> >> >> * Added di->opts flags for remaining chip features > >> >>> >> >> >> >> * Commented out untested bq27xxx_dm_regs parameters > >> >>> >> >> >> >> * Changed dbg_dupes to run only once > >> >>> >> >> >> >> > >> >>> >> >> >> >> Notes on v1: > >> >>> >> >> >> >> * Not fully tested (hence RFC tag) > >> >>> >> >> >> > > >> >>> >> >> >> > Thanks, full series queued. > >> >>> >> >> >> > > >> >>> >> >> >> > -- Sebastian > >> >>> >> >> >> > >> >>> >> >> >> Anyway, I've not got the time to fight these changes anymore, but at > >> >>> >> >> >> very least could you drop 4/5, it's static analysis code made into a > >> >>> >> >> >> runtime check built into a kernel driver, if not at least add my > >> >>> >> >> >> nacked-by. :) > >> >>> >> >> > > >> >>> >> >> > Since it's not critical at all and nobody depends on it, I dropped 4/5 > >> >>> >> >> > for now. I agree, that checking it at runtime is not nice. On the other > >> >>> >> >> > hand I do think a duplication check makes sense. Doing a static > >> >>> >> >> > check should be possible, but I have no idea how to implement this > >> >>> >> >> > (without much effort). I suspect Coccinelle can do it, so I added > >> >>> >> >> > Julia. > >> >>> >> >> > > >> >>> >> >> > For reference this is the runtime check: > >> >>> >> >> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9918953/ > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> The data structures being checked start here: > >> >>> >> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sre/linux-power-supply.git/tree/drivers/power/supply/bq27xxx_battery.c?h=for-next#n138 > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> And are aggregated here: > >> >>> >> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sre/linux-power-supply.git/tree/drivers/power/supply/bq27xxx_battery.c?h=for-next#n743 > >> >>> > > >> >>> > I worked a bit on this, but unfortunately there is a major parsing > >> >>> > problem, and most of the definitions are ignored. Specifically, the > >> >>> > definitions of the regs variables are interspersed with eg: > >> >>> > > >> >>> > #define bq27510g1_regs bq27500_regs > >> >>> > >> >>> You can transform the macros with sed to either of: > >> >>> > >> >>> static u8 *bq27510g1_regs = 0 // skip comparison if x == 0 > >> >>> > >> >>> static u8 bq27510g1_regs[BQ27XXX_REG_MAX] = { 0xFF } // skip > >> >>> comparison if x[0] == 0xff > >> >>> > >> >>> Does that help? > >> >> > >> >> Not quite, because it's really a list of variable declarations, like > >> >> > >> >> int a, b, c, d; > >> >> > >> >> The following could be fine: > >> >> > >> >> *bq27510g1_regs = 0, > >> > > >> > i forgot about the static u8 at the top of the array set. But yes, > >> > just drop static u8 from either of the alternatives I gave. > >> >