From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/10] PM: Rework handling of interrupts during suspend-resume (rev. 5) Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:01:11 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: References: <200902221837.49396.rjw@sisk.pl> <200903112215.02445.rjw@sisk.pl> <200903112250.10572.rjw@sisk.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge , Frans Pop , LKML , Jesse Barnes , "Eric W. Biederman" , pm list , Ingo Molnar List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 11 Mar 2009, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > I'm not worried about nested ones. Then you shouldn't be worried about IRQ_SUSPENDED at all, since that one increments the disabled depth count. So _all_ disable/enable_irq calls will by definition be nested inside IRQ_SUSPENDED. Linus