From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Len Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86 intel power: Initialize MSR_IA32_ENERGY_PERF_BIAS Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 16:44:26 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: References: <20110414090854.GB9248@elte.hu> <20110415101712.GB28007@elte.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-reply-to: <20110415101712.GB28007@elte.hu> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Andrew Morton , x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, Linus Torvalds , Thomas Gleixner , Alan Cox , Arjan van de Ven List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org > So how about informing users, how about making it non-silent? An informative > printk that also mentions the power configuration tool, etc. This solves the > concerns i mentioned. Something like this? rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_ENERGY_PERF_BIAS, epb); if ((epb & 0xF) == 0) { printk_once(KERN_WARN, "x86: updated energy_perf_bias" " to 'normal' from 'performance'\n" "You can view and update epb via utility," " such as x86_energy_perf_policy(8)\n"); epb = (epb & ~0xF) | ENERGY_PERF_BIAS_NORMAL; wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_ENERGY_PERF_BIAS, epb); }