From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2ADDB14900E; Mon, 10 Aug 2026 18:01:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.10 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1786384891; cv=none; b=ZuURX/l3/1587gUqncY7ch7z0GLFi8cuuBRKXhEYGGvrQSV+Ziwu+r4xTjzmqKmtsuhrvqED0eBKl3D/KE6q7fV1HVCFaYX0SNOKONBY9vxgBfTEfkINQ9OGGz02/OC6h6KWdgPOuQsdvkHvqFSyZBgKXEiHpQYpLwFqJv8mSr0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1786384891; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Mb4Df2+iaMeE0N/ZLdmadufa5b+Si/jrujRLGjDSYgE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=IJKP+Cq11sGbijtRw5/3GD5Ou1QbzSaAV/qANRVTi7aean32/woT4LLv/jZ/LZqthKUMgFZx6lnsitEr4sXJA3BiKoGlU+wRQNTlV4H/BFkIRHsPvcnXRjtI1IQMEYYWciZ3oUmQsZf2ffyPTGHpfrIktU3ugHQXg1S9CoE5jLw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=cKOEtZcb; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.10 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="cKOEtZcb" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1786384890; x=1817920890; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=Mb4Df2+iaMeE0N/ZLdmadufa5b+Si/jrujRLGjDSYgE=; b=cKOEtZcbWi4hkCIa8psAXHDapm9EjiZaUj1kFwuXYFxSR92qf+3gg3Z0 okp/I/dsS1N/3Og5hHTtBqZjTh/F6OgjbAUZghBeqLyN6nzZlCW/C+H/c 4Uht+0gR4SstSL/xaBUIvOKWJx7ir+N98/wMhAlXNvQ/EurJEMVhDQhba MV8+TTHCyTt26Bd5Uc3Fk/NyzpxnOXnuqBLF+bFkcOK8zi5QFcxUnw+Q8 /8a/1DIj5QIlEbTy141MH1dvpcKf+vui8eSdo3uRRj66Hs7cgqvRtEIxz 5Dj4U6DaAVRidWfzkt/8t5CfYCjVfkf2CxFWy7YUZVw+k/cHl5cQwWnsM A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: DHMRawxRQzuE31Nwm70oqw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: mBhcd3aTSt2bBZpRCPUsAg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11871"; a="104300697" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.25,216,1779174000"; d="scan'208";a="104300697" Received: from orviesa009.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.149]) by orvoesa102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 10 Aug 2026 11:01:29 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 3YuXQOOCSSKwOKmzuQDeIQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: uJ1SX3aURp68FNULdurLGw== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.25,216,1779174000"; d="scan'208";a="263704400" Received: from conormcd-mobl2.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.245.244.99]) by orviesa009-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 10 Aug 2026 11:01:25 -0700 Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2026 21:01:23 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Matti Vaittinen Cc: Matti Vaittinen , Matti Vaittinen , Andreas Kemnade , Sebastian Reichel , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Kalle Niemi , Topi =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sonkaj=E4rvi?= , Mikko Mutanen , Markus Laine Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] power: supply: bd71828: Drop duplicate power-supply property Message-ID: References: <518283ec9163943fcd1b53ad61fc3025fd346d83.1786356145.git.mazziesaccount@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <518283ec9163943fcd1b53ad61fc3025fd346d83.1786356145.git.mazziesaccount@gmail.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - c/o Alberga Business Park, 6 krs, Bertel Jungin Aukio 5, 02600 Espoo On Mon, Aug 10, 2026 at 01:09:25PM +0300, Matti Vaittinen wrote: > The POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_HEALTH is added into property-array twice. > > Drop the duplicate property. >From this commit message is not obvious why is this a fix. Perhaps elaborate that the index is somehow related (or what is the reason behind)? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko