From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DAD8A34EF0C; Thu, 3 Sep 2026 07:27:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.7 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788420475; cv=none; b=OfJYFvFt405Ju04z2MEx4LsiaT4FFFpcPfhvhzbjE7MO2ZeieGz6FD2s9IkxZgaLbfMERCFCptflwDLUSYxLWuPhuQW5NHmg8+MH7w0GxXvNJ6BlwRoWDVwbUR66LeodsLeySpYVkSWqIWgJqXQB3CjEMTzcRCdTlP9AMZdZdkQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788420475; c=relaxed/simple; bh=V/voFFq9KQLX7kBDBUKWGRZA+L/ydeYxyLBn3t5+acM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=IiUoMkve+iZ3/GpiOJ+a6Je/fDQbxabPL21aB0fTAr6VIlFMU91AQPy+QeZ70LzFJKJa2uH7fgM1ALhAT0f7tNFOXPDWWyBJP9CUNoPYynBcDnO9VjBGgrXDT5jYtIo8MudsYoofMkj92cOSwedronOQmJFudLX0Mq8EqZ446HA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=WiRPPJw3; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.7 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="WiRPPJw3" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1788420474; x=1819956474; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=V/voFFq9KQLX7kBDBUKWGRZA+L/ydeYxyLBn3t5+acM=; b=WiRPPJw3UNlu8a7EGPV7M7mR7/p1NRVG90hD9TgSRXPBOWwgSpODNObO tNHR5KUEwGXLL/y8tZFE4TQb5Umzn9bOFE7lzrx7VabXB9hBinMHcSGDs dp8tHx6E9VfBL73dm5Y77A3n/wg/b1byWzuktI/EgyOuyz8A1aFFrf47u 7Z2eRuICJ0+7/DJid+OClg3TT5OQUn2K36n2ZlemwoF1e7Kk+OIxg2tbp KDTcBlzw50I4Vfqr3tlQ159BcAh7jyXc8hUAVWvi+cFI9lSe0lm2Q6t2U FLsmsr89jVpCm9jwiGy2kx4trDncN410193p/p4rmcqQnW2AdfbWZOEf5 g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: j2zf9v1HS8u/MI1XHuBvWQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 8D5Z8r1nTrK41ISOVH33Jw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11894"; a="114434505" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.25,258,1779174000"; d="scan'208";a="114434505" Received: from fmviesa008.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.148]) by fmvoesa101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 03 Sep 2026 00:27:53 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: iNFgh2RaSOidy/gagV86NQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: fhio3FW4Ta2y1jNVcqvh7w== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.25,258,1779174000"; d="scan'208";a="267043680" Received: from smoticic-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.245.244.28]) by fmviesa008-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 03 Sep 2026 00:27:50 -0700 Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2026 10:27:48 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Linux ACPI , Linux PM , LKML , Mika Westerberg , Peixin Xie , Sakari Ailus , Lukas Wunner , Ilpo =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=E4rvinen?= , Linux PCI , Bjorn Helgaas , Hans de Goede Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] ACPI: scan: Combine two conditionals in acpi_bus_attach() Message-ID: References: <5144065.31r3eYUQgx@rafael.j.wysocki> <8743568.T7Z3S40VBb@rafael.j.wysocki> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8743568.T7Z3S40VBb@rafael.j.wysocki> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - c/o Alberga Business Park, 6 krs, Bertel Jungin Aukio 5, 02600 Espoo On Wed, Sep 02, 2026 at 09:30:00PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > There are two conditionals in acpi_bus_attach() that can be combined, > which slightly reduces the overhead and makes the code a bit easier > to follow, so do that. > > No intentional functional impact. Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko