Re: [PATCH] [power/reset] at91-sama5d2: Add error handling in at91_shdwc_probe

[Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>]

On 29/11/2023 at 14:29, Haoran Liu wrote:
> This patch adds error handling to the at91_shdwc_probe function
> in drivers/power/reset/at91-sama5d2_shdwc.c. The function

As the platforms are DT only and that this driver was instantiated 
precisely because a "match" existed, I don't think this error handling 
is needed because it cannot happen.

> previously did not handle the case where of_match_node could fail,
> potentially leading to unexpected behavior if the device tree match
> was unsuccessful.

You didn't say how you reached this "unexpected behavior": is it a real 
case (I'm interested in the boot log then) or found running a static 
analysis tool?

For now, it's a NACK, sorry. Best regards,
   Nicolas

> Signed-off-by: Haoran Liu <liuhaoran14@163.com>
> ---
>   drivers/power/reset/at91-sama5d2_shdwc.c | 5 +++++
>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/power/reset/at91-sama5d2_shdwc.c b/drivers/power/reset/at91-sama5d2_shdwc.c
> index e76b102b57b1..2ac566c83aec 100644
> --- a/drivers/power/reset/at91-sama5d2_shdwc.c
> +++ b/drivers/power/reset/at91-sama5d2_shdwc.c
> @@ -353,6 +353,11 @@ static int __init at91_shdwc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>                  return PTR_ERR(at91_shdwc->shdwc_base);
> 
>          match = of_match_node(at91_shdwc_of_match, pdev->dev.of_node);
> +       if (!match) {
> +               dev_err(&pdev->dev, "No matching device found\n");
> +               return -ENODEV;
> +       }
> +
>          at91_shdwc->rcfg = match->data;
> 
>          at91_shdwc->sclk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);
> --
> 2.17.1
>