linux-pm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>,
	Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
	Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@codeaurora.org>,
	Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@nxp.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PM: domains: Prevent power off for parent unless child is in deepest state
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2022 21:29:06 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b33ceac4-506a-65c8-7c80-b1b0a67ce65e@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220131113743.52265-1-ulf.hansson@linaro.org>

31.01.2022 14:37, Ulf Hansson пишет:
> A PM domain managed by genpd may support multiple idlestates. During
> genpd_power_off() a genpd governor may be asked to select one of the
> idlestates based upon the dev PM QoS constraints, for example.
> 
> However, there is a problem with the behaviour around this in genpd. More
> precisely, a parent-domain is allowed to be powered off, no matter of what
> idlestate that has been selected for the child-domain.
> 
> So far, we have not received any reports about errors, possibly because
> there might not be platform with this hierarchical configuration, yet.
> Nevertheless, it seems reasonable to change the behaviour into preventing
> the parent-domain from being powered off, unless the deepest idlestate has
> been selected for the child-domain, so let's do that.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/base/power/domain.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/base/power/domain.c b/drivers/base/power/domain.c
> index 5db704f02e71..7f97c5cabdc2 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/power/domain.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/power/domain.c
> @@ -636,6 +636,17 @@ static int genpd_power_off(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd, bool one_dev_on,
>  			atomic_read(&genpd->sd_count) > 0)
>  		return -EBUSY;
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * The children must be in their deepest states to allow the parent to
> +	 * be powered off. Note that, there's no need for additional locking, as
> +	 * powering on a child, requires the parent's lock to be acquired first.
> +	 */
> +	list_for_each_entry(link, &genpd->parent_links, parent_node) {
> +		struct generic_pm_domain *child = link->child;
> +		if (child->state_idx < child->state_count - 1)
> +			return -EBUSY;
> +	}
> +
>  	list_for_each_entry(pdd, &genpd->dev_list, list_node) {
>  		enum pm_qos_flags_status stat;
>  
> @@ -1073,6 +1084,13 @@ static void genpd_sync_power_off(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd, bool use_lock,
>  	    || atomic_read(&genpd->sd_count) > 0)
>  		return;
>  
> +	/* Check that the children are in their deepest state. */
> +	list_for_each_entry(link, &genpd->parent_links, parent_node) {
> +		struct generic_pm_domain *child = link->child;
> +		if (child->state_idx < child->state_count - 1)
> +			return;
> +	}
> +
>  	/* Choose the deepest state when suspending */
>  	genpd->state_idx = genpd->state_count - 1;
>  	if (_genpd_power_off(genpd, false))

Hello Ulf,

Is this needed by a concrete SoC? It needs to be clarified in the commit
message, otherwise looks like this patch wasn't tested and it's unclear
whether this change is really needed.

  reply	other threads:[~2022-01-31 18:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-01-31 11:37 [PATCH] PM: domains: Prevent power off for parent unless child is in deepest state Ulf Hansson
2022-01-31 18:29 ` Dmitry Osipenko [this message]
2022-02-04  9:43   ` Ulf Hansson
2022-02-04 19:10     ` Dmitry Osipenko
2022-02-07  8:43       ` Ulf Hansson
2022-02-13 12:14         ` Dmitry Osipenko
2022-02-14  9:22           ` Ulf Hansson
2022-02-15 21:49             ` Dmitry Osipenko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b33ceac4-506a-65c8-7c80-b1b0a67ce65e@gmail.com \
    --to=digetx@gmail.com \
    --cc=aisheng.dong@nxp.com \
    --cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
    --cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
    --cc=khilman@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=rnayak@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).