From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fw2.prolan.hu (fw2.prolan.hu [193.68.50.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8EB2AD530; Mon, 28 Apr 2025 08:44:39 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.68.50.107 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1745829883; cv=none; b=UAoxJeF2NzcfDnDp19VpU98P0V5iQg8oLOAwUFROZLJyESHjypScQ5xI+LmRkDhQ6hSnmCdS9OL/ScmvMyD6PdRLaYFa8aLqzrUNWn1nnC0xmXHtyVbk8PFrawDVpV9xWWvKOBN0bacR24F/UQmt9X3cDiOTqQd2lDl22KzWaY4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1745829883; c=relaxed/simple; bh=kDOOlpn4hGdk871V+vnkWTEeaPJnfV7z1o0lIRv9PQY=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:CC:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=jYoaPE0VkO0gYAJvm6dGVtauaxS80t+lE1jzGkN1X0GP1pqc0IH4ns9Dq3PddqomvaO5acEFOuX8FU7mKZNVQx4JjXcabam5ozfFAjjWwU4NO0kwaQ+iXTXGO+BYJGJelAlttn+qBcLMsUsDhHWWfViK6pR59VWRDXuNljtw4yQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=prolan.hu; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=prolan.hu; dkim=pass (4096-bit key) header.d=prolan.hu header.i=@prolan.hu header.b=K35f0nYN; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.68.50.107 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=prolan.hu Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=prolan.hu Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (4096-bit key) header.d=prolan.hu header.i=@prolan.hu header.b="K35f0nYN" Received: from proxmox-mailgw.intranet.prolan.hu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-mailgw.intranet.prolan.hu (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 16E47A06AB; Mon, 28 Apr 2025 10:44:30 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=prolan.hu; h=cc :cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:date :from:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=mail; bh=wxyYoBi3DgL4L83PBPGH n8OH+IryRzFYeqAsCylOSvo=; b=K35f0nYNDFT1Y4R6KNbrf7God9fUefsg/NU/ lJAzVssoQE/gfdvfu1j1qWPHA/j0EbtInFVCmZeoVKlILUPNKNgcM3+u9T65Bsm3 gbNCUrifGBZCgAX/oRnX/k3IR98iMcTVFGn2I4jgSv3fEg3/HmYlvRIO3sq885sL foz9rpvtJEXMLLV69BbWDPCZzLAFCeof2LcZxe46u0Al1bfjUTDgYIRKEd3/aE/E JN0XBZR2tEmu1ezpE5OhHJn80Fzzoo5OpkkCpBSY6FbmhFGcuvXTdILDIyc1/+IP tnuZ8l88auW8+Q8zoj7YC2yiiG8CpTbINO54XmUJICqxrc0AtU76Q22xen+bC6PC 8aRRVwOIglvUpKR8WZkziLLKJdHP7XMy9xJZL+feht5+Z9HNvQcKRcvXuppKSJFs nt70fA9RSNOJqb24hmU9dTwSNC372qzFBweuHxfskG0O+QVE1K0yynAlvN1mxPTi X7pgxVB4vZ5gjOOzEJYZbDnKTBz3X+iBRcXqUQPycgSbYtqpeSnHmhn1j9FzcM9o tZ81VCViEavhaSmg7NDqdGBEhPaoDxbWKM5IGclh3dcRK3NXag9pIE2Z17KdcNv8 27/jK0l1/89VnRjw66Fevo6LrcNzIhyvy9hId+bPMYwIAiq2Zgaxrl3tIyWYTe37 44mHwgc= Message-ID: Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2025 10:44:28 +0200 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] pm: runtime: Add new devm functions To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" CC: , , "Varshini Rajendran" , Tudor Ambarus , Mark Brown , , , "Len Brown" , Pavel Machek , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Danilo Krummrich , "Alexander Dahl" , Nicolas Ferre , Alexandre Belloni , Claudiu Beznea , Pavel Machek References: <20250327195928.680771-2-csokas.bence@prolan.hu> <20250327195928.680771-3-csokas.bence@prolan.hu> Content-Language: en-US, hu-HU From: =?UTF-8?B?Q3PDs2vDoXMgQmVuY2U=?= In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-ClientProxiedBy: ATLAS.intranet.prolan.hu (10.254.0.229) To ATLAS.intranet.prolan.hu (10.254.0.229) X-EsetResult: clean, is OK X-EsetId: 37303A2980D94853677366 Hi, On 2025. 04. 09. 19:43, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 8:59 PM Bence Csókás wrote: >> >> Add `devm_pm_runtime_set_active_enabled()` and >> `devm_pm_runtime_get_noresume()` for simplifying common cases in drivers. >> >> Signed-off-by: Bence Csókás > > I can apply this one alone if you want me to do that, but I could also > apply the other patch in the series if it got an ACK from the driver > maintainer. Did this end up being applied? Bence