From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Locke Subject: Re: cpufreq user<->kernel interface removal [was Re: community PM requirements/issues and PowerOP] Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 01:41:27 -0700 Message-ID: References: <20060911210026.GG11901@elf.ucw.cz> <20060911213930.GJ11901@elf.ucw.cz> <4505E62F.1000203@gmail.com> <20060911230529.GC13474@elf.ucw.cz> <20060911235025.GA14234@linux.intel.com> <20060912033537.GC27397@kroah.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v624) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20060912033537.GC27397@kroah.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org To: Greg KH Cc: lkml@elf.ucw.cz.kroah.org, Preece Scott-PREECE , Pavel Machek , pm list List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Sep 11, 2006, at 8:35 PM, Greg KH wrote: > On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 04:50:25PM -0700, Mark Gross wrote: >> The PowerOP patch has nothing to do with the removal of cpufreq. You >> may be confusing this work with the david signleton patch. > > I am totally confused about who is working on what, and what provides > what. > > Can someone make quick cheat-sheet that shows the different > developers/companies and projects here? The fact that it's impossible > to keep this straight in the first place does not bode well... > > Or, can each of the different projects send a _short_, 1 paragraph, 4 > sentance maximum summary of the different things. Think of it as your > "elevator pitch". The different multi-page summaries ware making my > eyes glaze over... > Sure, I think that is very necessary right now. In fact, everyone = should probably hold off on commenting until this is well understood. While I think its good to reset the discussion with a high level = summary, a lot of discussion explaining why PowerOP is required for = embedded devices has occurred over the last several months that can not = be summarized in 4 sentences. People will definitely need to read the = archives to catch up on the why. The PowerOP summary will follow soon. > thanks, > > greg k-h >