Re: Cpufreq regression in next-20161207

Viresh Kumar
2016-12-08T05:07:43Z

Hi Tony,

On 07-12-16, 20:56, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Looks like commit ef3caabee969 ("PM / OPP: Don't assume platform doesn't
> have regulators") caused a regression in Linux next-20161207 for at least
> omap4 pandaboard. We now hit kernel BUG at drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:1235.
>
> Any ideas?

I saw similar regression for Tegra and the offending commit is now
dropped from pm/linux-next. So linux-next should be fine after
fetching it today.

But just for my understanding, who is doing voltage scaling for OMAP4
then? The cpufreq-dt driver will only frequency scaling, as it fails
to find a regulator for the CPUs.

--
viresh