RE: [PATCH] cpuidle-haltpoll: Disable kvm guest polling when mwait_idle is used

["Li,Rongqing" <lirongqing@baidu.com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Sent: Tuesday, December 6, 2022 8:08 PM
> To: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org>; Li,Rongqing <lirongqing@baidu.com>
> Cc: mingo@redhat.com; bp@alien8.de; dave.hansen@linux.intel.com;
> x86@kernel.org; rafael@kernel.org; daniel.lezcano@linaro.org;
> peterz@infradead.org; akpm@linux-foundation.org; tony.luck@intel.com;
> jpoimboe@kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpuidle-haltpoll: Disable kvm guest polling when
> mwait_idle is used
> 
> On Tue, Dec 06 2022 at 12:59, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 6, 2022 at 7:43 AM <lirongqing@baidu.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> +bool is_mwait_idle(void)
> >> +{
> >> +       return x86_idle == mwait_idle; }
> >> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(is_mwait_idle);
> 
> No, this is just another adhoc check, which scratches ONE particular itch.
> 
> >> @@ -111,6 +112,9 @@ static int __init haltpoll_init(void)
> >>         if (!kvm_para_available() || !haltpoll_want())
> >>                 return -ENODEV;
> >>
> >> +       if (is_mwait_idle())
> >> +               return -ENODEV;
> >> +
> >
> > So perhaps you could make default_enter_idle() be a bit more careful
> > about what it calls as the "default idle" routine?
> 
> Correct. arch_cpu_idle() is the one which should be called.
> 

Greats,  using arch_cpu_idle() can get best latency,

Before change, "sockperf ping-pong -i 127.0.0.1 -p 20001  --tcp " latency is:
sockperf: Summary: Latency is 6.245 usec

this patch, disable cpuidle-haltpoll
sockperf: Summary: Latency is 4.671 usec


using arch_cpu_idle() in default_enter_idle()
sockperf: Summary: Latency is 4.285 usec


thanks

-LiRongQing


> Thanks,
> 
>         tglx