From: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
To: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: daniel.lezcano@linaro.org, amitk@kernel.org, rui.zhang@intel.com,
viresh.kumar@linaro.org, rafael@kernel.org,
dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, nm@ti.com, sboyd@kernel.org,
sudeep.holla@arm.com, cristian.marussi@arm.com,
matthias.bgg@gmail.com, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Energy Model power in micro-Watts and SCMI v3.1 alignment
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2022 10:49:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <be793e51-0d89-7afd-e122-ec929a1130e9@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220622145802.13032-1-lukasz.luba@arm.com>
Hi guys,
Are there any objections to these patches?
On 6/22/22 15:57, Lukasz Luba wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is a patch set which changes Energy Model power values scale to
> micro-Watts. It also upgrades the SCMI performance layer + scmi-cpufreq
> driver to leverage the SCMI v3.1 spec and process micro-Watts power values
> coming from FW. The higher precision in EM power field solves an issue
> of a rounding error, which then can be misinterpreted as 'inefficient OPP'.
> An example rounding issue calculation is present in patch 1/4 description.
>
> Regards,
> Lukasz Luba
>
> Lukasz Luba (4):
> PM: EM: convert power field to micro-Watts precision and align drivers
> Documentation: EM: Switch to micro-Watts scale
> firmware: arm_scmi: Get detailed power scale from perf
> cpufreq: scmi: Support the power scale in micro-Watts in SCMI v3.1
>
> Documentation/power/energy-model.rst | 14 +++---
> drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq-hw.c | 7 +--
> drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c | 15 ++++++-
> drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c | 18 +++++---
> drivers/opp/of.c | 15 ++++---
> drivers/powercap/dtpm_cpu.c | 5 +--
> drivers/thermal/cpufreq_cooling.c | 13 +++++-
> drivers/thermal/devfreq_cooling.c | 19 ++++++--
> include/linux/energy_model.h | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++-------
> include/linux/scmi_protocol.h | 8 +++-
> kernel/power/energy_model.c | 31 ++++++++-----
> 11 files changed, 146 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-)
>
I would like to move forward with the micro-Watts in
the Energy Model. We have feedback from our partners
that this is a limitation. Also, as you can see
this uW is part of the new SCMI spec, which we
have support on our roadmap.
Regards,
Lukasz
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-29 9:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-22 14:57 [PATCH 0/4] Energy Model power in micro-Watts and SCMI v3.1 alignment Lukasz Luba
2022-06-22 14:57 ` [PATCH 1/4] PM: EM: convert power field to micro-Watts precision and align drivers Lukasz Luba
2022-07-05 9:09 ` Daniel Lezcano
2022-07-06 9:05 ` Lukasz Luba
2022-06-22 14:58 ` [PATCH 2/4] Documentation: EM: Switch to micro-Watts scale Lukasz Luba
2022-07-05 9:10 ` Daniel Lezcano
2022-07-06 9:06 ` Lukasz Luba
2022-06-22 14:58 ` [PATCH 3/4] firmware: arm_scmi: Get detailed power scale from perf Lukasz Luba
2022-06-22 15:53 ` Sudeep Holla
2022-06-23 7:50 ` Lukasz Luba
2022-06-22 14:58 ` [PATCH 4/4] cpufreq: scmi: Support the power scale in micro-Watts in SCMI v3.1 Lukasz Luba
2022-06-22 15:55 ` Sudeep Holla
2022-07-05 9:25 ` Daniel Lezcano
2022-07-06 9:08 ` Lukasz Luba
2022-06-29 9:49 ` Lukasz Luba [this message]
2022-06-29 9:53 ` [PATCH 0/4] Energy Model power in micro-Watts and SCMI v3.1 alignment Viresh Kumar
2022-06-29 10:00 ` Lukasz Luba
2022-06-29 10:01 ` Viresh Kumar
2022-06-29 10:21 ` Daniel Lezcano
2022-06-29 10:24 ` Lukasz Luba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=be793e51-0d89-7afd-e122-ec929a1130e9@arm.com \
--to=lukasz.luba@arm.com \
--cc=amitk@kernel.org \
--cc=cristian.marussi@arm.com \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=nm@ti.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox