Linux Power Management development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
To: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: daniel.lezcano@linaro.org, amitk@kernel.org, rui.zhang@intel.com,
	viresh.kumar@linaro.org, rafael@kernel.org,
	dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, nm@ti.com, sboyd@kernel.org,
	sudeep.holla@arm.com, cristian.marussi@arm.com,
	matthias.bgg@gmail.com, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Energy Model power in micro-Watts and SCMI v3.1 alignment
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2022 10:49:26 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <be793e51-0d89-7afd-e122-ec929a1130e9@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220622145802.13032-1-lukasz.luba@arm.com>

Hi guys,

Are there any objections to these patches?


On 6/22/22 15:57, Lukasz Luba wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> This is a patch set which changes Energy Model power values scale to
> micro-Watts. It also upgrades the SCMI performance layer + scmi-cpufreq
> driver to leverage the SCMI v3.1 spec and process micro-Watts power values
> coming from FW. The higher precision in EM power field solves an issue
> of a rounding error, which then can be misinterpreted as 'inefficient OPP'.
> An example rounding issue calculation is present in patch 1/4 description.
> 
> Regards,
> Lukasz Luba
> 
> Lukasz Luba (4):
>    PM: EM: convert power field to micro-Watts precision and align drivers
>    Documentation: EM: Switch to micro-Watts scale
>    firmware: arm_scmi: Get detailed power scale from perf
>    cpufreq: scmi: Support the power scale in micro-Watts in SCMI v3.1
> 
>   Documentation/power/energy-model.rst  | 14 +++---
>   drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq-hw.c |  7 +--
>   drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c        | 15 ++++++-
>   drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c      | 18 +++++---
>   drivers/opp/of.c                      | 15 ++++---
>   drivers/powercap/dtpm_cpu.c           |  5 +--
>   drivers/thermal/cpufreq_cooling.c     | 13 +++++-
>   drivers/thermal/devfreq_cooling.c     | 19 ++++++--
>   include/linux/energy_model.h          | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++-------
>   include/linux/scmi_protocol.h         |  8 +++-
>   kernel/power/energy_model.c           | 31 ++++++++-----
>   11 files changed, 146 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-)
> 


I would like to move forward with the micro-Watts in
the Energy Model. We have feedback from our partners
that this is a limitation. Also, as you can see
this uW is part of the new SCMI spec, which we
have support on our roadmap.

Regards,
Lukasz

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-06-29  9:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-22 14:57 [PATCH 0/4] Energy Model power in micro-Watts and SCMI v3.1 alignment Lukasz Luba
2022-06-22 14:57 ` [PATCH 1/4] PM: EM: convert power field to micro-Watts precision and align drivers Lukasz Luba
2022-07-05  9:09   ` Daniel Lezcano
2022-07-06  9:05     ` Lukasz Luba
2022-06-22 14:58 ` [PATCH 2/4] Documentation: EM: Switch to micro-Watts scale Lukasz Luba
2022-07-05  9:10   ` Daniel Lezcano
2022-07-06  9:06     ` Lukasz Luba
2022-06-22 14:58 ` [PATCH 3/4] firmware: arm_scmi: Get detailed power scale from perf Lukasz Luba
2022-06-22 15:53   ` Sudeep Holla
2022-06-23  7:50     ` Lukasz Luba
2022-06-22 14:58 ` [PATCH 4/4] cpufreq: scmi: Support the power scale in micro-Watts in SCMI v3.1 Lukasz Luba
2022-06-22 15:55   ` Sudeep Holla
2022-07-05  9:25   ` Daniel Lezcano
2022-07-06  9:08     ` Lukasz Luba
2022-06-29  9:49 ` Lukasz Luba [this message]
2022-06-29  9:53   ` [PATCH 0/4] Energy Model power in micro-Watts and SCMI v3.1 alignment Viresh Kumar
2022-06-29 10:00     ` Lukasz Luba
2022-06-29 10:01       ` Viresh Kumar
2022-06-29 10:21         ` Daniel Lezcano
2022-06-29 10:24           ` Lukasz Luba

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=be793e51-0d89-7afd-e122-ec929a1130e9@arm.com \
    --to=lukasz.luba@arm.com \
    --cc=amitk@kernel.org \
    --cc=cristian.marussi@arm.com \
    --cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=nm@ti.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox