From: bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org
To: linux-pm@kernel.org
Subject: [Bug 194963] schedutil governor causes audio problem in game
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 04:02:21 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-194963-137361-0ezpm8lLZ8@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-194963-137361@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194963
--- Comment #8 from John (john.ettedgui@gmail.com) ---
(In reply to Rafael J. Wysocki from comment #7)
> OK, this means that schedutil is not a good match for you.
>
> It is a bit less aggressive than ondemand, on purpose.
Oh I see, I didn't realize that, I thought it was about as dynamic as ondemand.
Then I am sorry about a wrong report!
> There is one more schedutil change that you may try, but I need to prepare a
> patch for that first.
>
I'll be happy to test it whenever it's ready. Since I have plenty of workaround
there's of course no sense of urgence on my end.
> If you mean scaling_governor=performance, then it will always request the
> max P-state now, as that's what it is supposed to be doing.
Yes that is what I meant, I thought scaling_governor=performance with
driver=intel_pstate would scale unlike with driver=cpufreq, I was wrong again.
> Thanks for the testing, the intel_pstate change will be queued up for 4.12
> in the next couple of days.
Well thank you for this patch, I am happy to finally be able to use pstate :)
If you don't mind me asking here, since we talked about many different
governors, and their drivers, which one do you recommend for a desktop, that
does run games, but also other things that don't require much power. Based on
my tests I'm thinking either cpufreq's ondemand or pstate's powersave.
Thank you!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-24 4:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-23 10:40 [Bug 194963] New: schedutil governor causes audio problem in game bugzilla-daemon
2017-03-23 13:07 ` [Bug 194963] " bugzilla-daemon
2017-03-23 14:31 ` bugzilla-daemon
2017-03-23 15:11 ` bugzilla-daemon
2017-03-23 23:03 ` bugzilla-daemon
2017-03-23 23:23 ` bugzilla-daemon
2017-03-24 0:40 ` bugzilla-daemon
2017-03-24 1:11 ` bugzilla-daemon
2017-03-24 4:02 ` bugzilla-daemon [this message]
2017-03-24 15:17 ` bugzilla-daemon
2017-03-24 23:06 ` bugzilla-daemon
2017-03-27 23:12 ` bugzilla-daemon
2017-03-27 23:14 ` bugzilla-daemon
2017-03-28 22:54 ` bugzilla-daemon
2017-03-29 0:28 ` bugzilla-daemon
2017-03-29 5:21 ` bugzilla-daemon
2017-03-29 6:27 ` bugzilla-daemon
2017-03-29 20:28 ` bugzilla-daemon
2017-03-30 3:32 ` bugzilla-daemon
2017-03-30 14:24 ` bugzilla-daemon
2017-03-31 3:51 ` bugzilla-daemon
2017-03-31 8:45 ` bugzilla-daemon
2017-03-31 8:57 ` bugzilla-daemon
2017-03-31 9:00 ` bugzilla-daemon
2017-05-07 14:58 ` bugzilla-daemon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-194963-137361-0ezpm8lLZ8@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/ \
--to=bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).