From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E12D6CDA9 for ; Tue, 21 May 2024 13:09:57 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1716296997; cv=none; b=bOc5lBF0HcqLXLWjum7hs1aMbLw87kRtCkvESJ3fMInBjHR8wnfpHYyPRys7vTKKKw+ckgMSVpp3+6j63jVG3QXVjb/8KYUAIMzWr16YKPw+KHUI8cycNTJ7DVVzN7bmonWCx58JY9lspOY3yvyl9exsKi9sY0wTocrforaHgug= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1716296997; c=relaxed/simple; bh=rJ5RYcsJiK2HBdRps3UySYxdnsIL9nywqbCG8ysg5bA=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=hXd4Cp+E0/ywzQKxmr79GV+SJhcEf/+hgGEGPQVrFrG1LcBhuA2u49mXp/taJUfkljD3hgperKm/GCvL7WapCANcsTq/NuBBkyy+v72h5VLuXqmiINZB/EjFQ73kNM2gJ7d167x1aZFet0C9IpklmlELX5vtp80GeWOL6NcMF2c= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=TxEa+d82; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="TxEa+d82" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DAC0AC4AF08 for ; Tue, 21 May 2024 13:09:56 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1716296996; bh=rJ5RYcsJiK2HBdRps3UySYxdnsIL9nywqbCG8ysg5bA=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=TxEa+d82sa+o8D0YF7imEiZX4RFctKTUmVprC2RYCmMvgfi2fhkQI4AdqkuT04UmH 5ec6ow7PF0lCOXxC+oE0j1Xsodwm52lsMdr/gUW+v0qFw1Sr8groC8BCms8zDwWYTR vgXT9Q+R/Qr3z+xUCE+ejX9Raj96V5FXuIAXCefsVjNmCyaZ+nJ+7o1sK4eR4kKhZd N9sjqodYRbZvNSm6S+IKIDwV1zhmHhfO1X++hcpMvy4jiHuVL9MRmwUyj8muByMC/T yO8CdzjtvxLQdOadI+LJRFuvWepmxGoLAuq2eECzGUhi3H5RZwvYgAtzqsCnZz6UxT S2y+c1gh24Zag== Received: by aws-us-west-2-korg-bugzilla-1.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id CE834C53BB8; Tue, 21 May 2024 13:09:56 +0000 (UTC) From: bugzilla-daemon@kernel.org To: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Subject: [Bug 217618] Changing maximum frequency and boost state does not work with amd-pstate in passive mode plus the schedutil governor Date: Tue, 21 May 2024 13:09:56 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Power Management X-Bugzilla-Component: cpufreq X-Bugzilla-Version: 2.5 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: putr4.s@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: CODE_FIX X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D217618 Prajna Sariputra (putr4.s@gmail.com) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |CODE_FIX --- Comment #5 from Prajna Sariputra (putr4.s@gmail.com) --- With kernel 6.9.0, it looks like limiting the frequency control now works in both active and passive mode, and in the latter case both the schedutil and ondemand governors respect the frequency limit, so this appears to be fixed= for me, thanks! --=20 You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=