From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67C9233C9 for ; Sat, 6 Apr 2024 01:43:44 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712367824; cv=none; b=lCWqT/i7ZLC2tU1QI36Mka6BLF/ACTz9GXfRDdwqbOTIbG5VYe2Wap2nmRX6ecEsgicwqyKCeEutEKHo99lNspt81TNvzErfbPR/Q4tDqdmWe3tqZTCWUSkMwq9AdOiFypA+fPjH3TqsDJwVX4A0A/Y4LX/lfI3i2bVYBpYGHiw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712367824; c=relaxed/simple; bh=QpiehBBXLUyylvuL3QcZDWCxWeDCC8hyWB7hRQNL6AA=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=MAfuk3wYwfibYFf6bQBmVYdgYO5HIT9k68gyyTvhbUkJ2y/2RXNmqYVXrIxzOcJG2PMN4wnUfOmykIALvcZq/8LGKDVCz4X1xeQs9Dl6WqCSw0JLRfIZvq4ZZrnm4F/k4564CNRyfp3zeJlaDj0tYmxubpg1h6QT/YxpOtFrnl0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=tp2pG69k; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="tp2pG69k" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D8E23C433A6 for ; Sat, 6 Apr 2024 01:43:43 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1712367823; bh=QpiehBBXLUyylvuL3QcZDWCxWeDCC8hyWB7hRQNL6AA=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=tp2pG69k1N3cFWZIiMdpMewgv6xemi/UNjOg1TX1WfrZCcE060z/PT3lpXxwAuFor IsSNSlHovKjAY3i8zjoos+A7LWhYUk8dzEJlzApSYASLSEG12CVsSsKzHtN0S/Pik/ jc6V6BFy1N7OpJv+w/eDHhSBhxL0GLO4bpcnqxo81CCMLmCnOE4TzzEsjEszED/eam lnnNRMGX8tcVq2DOnv51kaYNSCQKYpx4W1laRd9eHYz8vfaxl2dCyF1ZdOeyZArB9w H0JuiE3N+58RxNymmiSXjhJ13seeCJuSMzoJtfwFG3LHyYu+/0iNzf8dyGEafCWP1D fykR2zZN/B82w== Received: by aws-us-west-2-korg-bugzilla-1.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id CCA2DC53BD9; Sat, 6 Apr 2024 01:43:43 +0000 (UTC) From: bugzilla-daemon@kernel.org To: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Subject: [Bug 217931] amd-pstate lacks crucial features: CPU frequency and boost control Date: Sat, 06 Apr 2024 01:43:43 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Power Management X-Bugzilla-Component: cpufreq X-Bugzilla-Version: 2.5 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: high X-Bugzilla-Who: aros@gmx.com X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D217931 --- Comment #58 from Artem S. Tashkinov (aros@gmx.com) --- Thank you, Perry, there's no rush! Not the last question, here's one more, I wrote about it earlier. cpuinfo_max_freq is invalid for multiple cores here as it often reports ins= ane values: $ lscpu -ae CPU NODE SOCKET CORE L1d:L1i:L2:L3 ONLINE MAXMHZ MINMHZ MHZ 0 0 0 0 0:0:0:0 yes 5137.0000 400.0000 400.0000 1 0 0 0 0:0:0:0 yes 5137.0000 400.0000 1394.3910 2 0 0 1 1:1:1:0 yes 6080.0000 400.0000 400.0000 3 0 0 1 1:1:1:0 yes 6080.0000 400.0000 400.0000 4 0 0 2 2:2:2:0 yes 5608.0000 400.0000 1396.2390 5 0 0 2 2:2:2:0 yes 5608.0000 400.0000 400.0000 6 0 0 3 3:3:3:0 yes 5293.0000 400.0000 400.0000 7 0 0 3 3:3:3:0 yes 5293.0000 400.0000 400.0000 8 0 0 4 4:4:4:0 yes 5449.0000 400.0000 1381.5620 9 0 0 4 4:4:4:0 yes 5449.0000 400.0000 1393.0980 10 0 0 5 5:5:5:0 yes 6080.0000 400.0000 1383.3900 11 0 0 5 5:5:5:0 yes 6080.0000 400.0000 1397.3979 12 0 0 6 6:6:6:0 yes 5764.0000 400.0000 1397.4200 13 0 0 6 6:6:6:0 yes 5764.0000 400.0000 400.0000 14 0 0 7 7:7:7:0 yes 5924.0000 400.0000 1396.0959 15 0 0 7 7:7:7:0 yes 5924.0000 400.0000 400.0000 5137MHz is probably the best my CPU cores can do. No way 6080MHz is possibl= e. I wonder if you could fix it. HWiNFO64 reads maximum CPU cores frequencies correctly. --=20 You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=