From: bugzilla-daemon@kernel.org
To: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [Bug 217931] amd-pstate lacks crucial features: CPU frequency and boost control
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2025 20:31:43 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-217931-137361-IaWSIdIhpe@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-217931-137361@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217931
--- Comment #77 from Miroslav Pavleski (miroslav@pavleski.net) ---
> I'm confused here on the timing of all of these events, do you mean to say
> that
the patch did nothing? That's what it seems like at least.
All the files in the zip are after applying the patched kernel and rebooting.
amd_pstate_report-2025-02-17_post_patch2.txt is report created after resuming
from s2idle.
I've just double checked in the source tree used for building the kernel
package. The patch is applied.
In addition, I did some more testing after resuming from sleep. Seems now it is
not jumping above the scaling_max_freq when not stressed.
I stress tested all 16 cores and then it ramped up towards boost freq. (above
nominal 3.3), while having scaling_max_freq set to 1.6GHz and boost 0. However
when I stopped the cpu hogging, it ramped back down idling between 400MHz and
1400MHz. Subjectively I would say the behavior is now *way better*, the CPU is
not drawing a lot of power when not stressed, under light desktop use. The fans
stay quiet.
Seems like the amd-pstate-epp has complex algorithm that takes the
scaling_max_freq as a hint, not as hard limit. The upside is that when needed,
it adapts to those needs. The downside is that this is not ideal under battery
use, as rogue processes (e.g. browser tabs) might drain battery without the
user realizing it.
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-17 20:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 84+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-20 11:06 [Bug 217931] New: amd-pstate lacks crucial features: CPU frequency and boost control bugzilla-daemon
2023-09-20 11:07 ` [Bug 217931] " bugzilla-daemon
2023-09-20 13:15 ` [Bug 217931] New: " Bagas Sanjaya
2023-09-20 13:15 ` [Bug 217931] " bugzilla-daemon
2023-09-20 13:28 ` bugzilla-daemon
2023-09-21 5:25 ` bugzilla-daemon
2023-09-21 8:21 ` bugzilla-daemon
2023-09-21 8:23 ` bugzilla-daemon
2023-09-21 18:24 ` bugzilla-daemon
2023-09-21 18:27 ` bugzilla-daemon
2023-10-10 12:57 ` bugzilla-daemon
2023-10-10 13:00 ` bugzilla-daemon
2023-10-18 18:38 ` bugzilla-daemon
2023-12-28 19:27 ` bugzilla-daemon
2023-12-28 19:27 ` bugzilla-daemon
2024-01-07 2:38 ` bugzilla-daemon
2024-01-18 7:58 ` bugzilla-daemon
2024-01-18 16:38 ` bugzilla-daemon
2024-01-18 16:41 ` bugzilla-daemon
2024-01-18 16:49 ` bugzilla-daemon
2024-01-18 16:54 ` bugzilla-daemon
2024-01-18 17:08 ` bugzilla-daemon
2024-01-18 19:22 ` bugzilla-daemon
2024-01-18 19:48 ` bugzilla-daemon
2024-01-18 19:53 ` bugzilla-daemon
2024-01-18 20:14 ` bugzilla-daemon
2024-01-18 20:22 ` bugzilla-daemon
2024-01-18 22:39 ` bugzilla-daemon
2024-01-19 0:23 ` bugzilla-daemon
2024-01-19 3:31 ` bugzilla-daemon
2024-01-19 3:32 ` bugzilla-daemon
2024-01-19 7:05 ` bugzilla-daemon
2024-01-19 18:48 ` bugzilla-daemon
2024-01-19 19:11 ` bugzilla-daemon
2024-01-19 21:38 ` bugzilla-daemon
2024-01-20 0:20 ` bugzilla-daemon
2024-01-20 2:24 ` bugzilla-daemon
2024-01-20 5:48 ` bugzilla-daemon
2024-01-20 23:57 ` bugzilla-daemon
2024-01-22 21:46 ` bugzilla-daemon
2024-01-29 7:53 ` bugzilla-daemon
2024-01-29 22:36 ` bugzilla-daemon
2024-01-30 14:03 ` bugzilla-daemon
2024-02-01 7:40 ` bugzilla-daemon
2024-02-01 7:43 ` bugzilla-daemon
2024-02-01 8:56 ` bugzilla-daemon
2024-02-01 9:00 ` bugzilla-daemon
2024-02-01 9:58 ` bugzilla-daemon
2024-02-01 10:48 ` bugzilla-daemon
2024-02-01 12:01 ` bugzilla-daemon
2024-02-01 12:04 ` bugzilla-daemon
2024-02-01 12:05 ` bugzilla-daemon
2024-02-02 3:02 ` bugzilla-daemon
2024-02-02 3:23 ` bugzilla-daemon
2024-02-02 3:26 ` bugzilla-daemon
2024-02-20 23:01 ` bugzilla-daemon
2024-02-21 3:14 ` bugzilla-daemon
2024-04-06 1:38 ` bugzilla-daemon
2024-04-06 1:39 ` bugzilla-daemon
2024-04-06 1:43 ` bugzilla-daemon
2024-04-08 3:27 ` bugzilla-daemon
2024-06-12 12:01 ` bugzilla-daemon
2024-06-12 12:03 ` bugzilla-daemon
2024-06-12 15:05 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-02-17 7:23 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-02-17 7:48 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-02-17 7:50 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-02-17 7:51 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-02-17 7:59 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-02-17 17:38 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-02-17 18:44 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-02-17 18:44 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-02-17 18:55 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-02-17 18:56 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-02-17 19:12 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-02-17 19:31 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-02-17 20:11 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-02-17 20:23 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-02-17 20:31 ` bugzilla-daemon [this message]
2025-02-17 20:32 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-02-17 21:21 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-02-17 21:56 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-02-17 22:09 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-02-18 9:53 ` bugzilla-daemon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-217931-137361-IaWSIdIhpe@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/ \
--to=bugzilla-daemon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).