From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 633A06A01E for ; Tue, 10 Sep 2024 00:49:32 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1725929372; cv=none; b=kOkwTzQv0wRYkLVi16mKkmMVhVefREGtfijKmO4u0OWDsCoK4Qon8O3BwK/VdCfWib4tJgQVG6fW0ojEeg4zbYMJlJmtP4kfxhL4e7NEFknYA7AqK8Pvi7tECi8r5y13Zg+rA4H2aQH4mWuHJ6vsBxewoc+QwooY8s2UqbIirLw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1725929372; c=relaxed/simple; bh=KUn9qJ9XNFNKbTJ636Rc7pZzBGVnHcGFh2A7Tg2zzqs=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=pOCV8GBPXFXS7t5N5EOQGXHbrYR5b0n5hthUgnbbuejDgpbWggrLNh3LTYuIl439cM3RmMnWrOlYqPndoBOTSQZBs10sS0dgddP16IKyni8AEH0XyJc9040NOgVIb1A936MZLsZBwATJsNh7L27QiSKHpZ1HFrkMriR/qSsXTn8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=HO+9/z3s; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="HO+9/z3s" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D35EC4CED0 for ; Tue, 10 Sep 2024 00:49:32 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1725929372; bh=KUn9qJ9XNFNKbTJ636Rc7pZzBGVnHcGFh2A7Tg2zzqs=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=HO+9/z3sywR8g3aacgOUIMzxvsUYdWHTCnWIpgbPnuu53CAAqZC1ksKPNMkGBsFNt 59pBKBwG72hKPO7d4YesueAD9zhy+hYwUvddE6hw4HRUzDehVOI6rRtt9nfCfTC5jz D1y/5tbvPBuC+9DbUgsDSPAFTYCqkwMXN0AznUGIQy1jTDTSSsA9gKopw/ep6kUabU OcuIGY1FTjo+O4Ldl1RD+YEpuxFl6q4wMbsGhADnwGBM4gCZnpxqfzb1NGwyf6GXD9 z1jpDUZkqNrXvUlzb/jYEiFKJPi3kALWpeROHy3yVNGeF+2UmiFrEuzBlRfYSTNgeA fwWP4vtfaMJKA== Received: by aws-us-west-2-korg-bugzilla-1.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 24ACFC53BB8; Tue, 10 Sep 2024 00:49:32 +0000 (UTC) From: bugzilla-daemon@kernel.org To: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Subject: [Bug 218686] Fail to set energy_performance_preference of amd processor on asus ga403uv Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2024 00:49:31 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Power Management X-Bugzilla-Component: cpufreq X-Bugzilla-Version: 2.5 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: al0uette@outlook.com X-Bugzilla-Status: REOPENED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D218686 --- Comment #93 from al0uette@outlook.com --- (In reply to derp from comment #90) > There's no ideal diagnostic tool for that, as for frequencies they are se= en > as something like that, but it was probably the same or very close without > CPPC >=20 > (I wouldn't mind if all of these somehow got to 400Mhz instead of 1400Mhz > though) >=20 > cat /proc/cpuinfo|grep MHz|sort > cpu MHz : 1395.796 > cpu MHz : 1396.448 > cpu MHz : 1397.373 > cpu MHz : 1397.388 > cpu MHz : 1397.403 > cpu MHz : 1397.414 > cpu MHz : 1397.434 > cpu MHz : 400.000 > cpu MHz : 400.000 > cpu MHz : 400.000 > cpu MHz : 400.000 > cpu MHz : 400.000 > cpu MHz : 400.000 > cpu MHz : 400.000 > cpu MHz : 400.000 > cpu MHz : 400.000 >=20 > the main difference can be seen in amdgpu_top, which for some reason trea= ts > CPU cores as GPU cores > it can show mW per Core, and even when frequency stays at 1400, the mW po= wer > assigned to these cores is much much smaller, as well as total "GFX" power > which is the total APU power, I guess >=20 > "GFX" is now about 700 mW and "SoC" about 400mW when idle >=20 > power savings are about 1W for system idle and low-power activities Strangely, the gfx power almost always stays above 2000mw for me, the lowest value it can go is about 1600mw, but it can only stay there for just 1 seco= nd. Is it because our cpu are different? But even though my power consumption is higher than you, it's still better than acpi-cpufreq and the cpu temperatur= e is significantly lower than acpi-cpufreq --=20 You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=