* [Bug 219851] [amd-pstate 6.15] Frequency Scaling Will Not Scale Above Lowest Non-Linear Performance on Ryzen 7 5700U
2025-03-08 12:52 [Bug 219851] New: [amd-pstate 6.15] Frequency Scaling Will Not Scale Above Lowest Non-Linear Performance on Ryzen 7 5700U bugzilla-daemon
@ 2025-03-08 12:52 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-03-10 5:13 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (4 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2025-03-08 12:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-pm
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=219851
--- Comment #1 from Eric Naim (dnaim@cachyos.org) ---
Created attachment 307782
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=307782&action=edit
amd-pstate-triage log from good kernel
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* [Bug 219851] [amd-pstate 6.15] Frequency Scaling Will Not Scale Above Lowest Non-Linear Performance on Ryzen 7 5700U
2025-03-08 12:52 [Bug 219851] New: [amd-pstate 6.15] Frequency Scaling Will Not Scale Above Lowest Non-Linear Performance on Ryzen 7 5700U bugzilla-daemon
2025-03-08 12:52 ` [Bug 219851] " bugzilla-daemon
@ 2025-03-10 5:13 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-03-10 15:41 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (3 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2025-03-10 5:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-pm
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=219851
--- Comment #2 from Dhananjay Ugwekar (AMD) (Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com) ---
Hello Eric,
1. Could you please give more details on how to reproduce the issue? which
governor, amd-pstate mode (when the issue was observed), workload. Are you able
to reproduce the issue on your machine as well?
2. Just to confirm, does the user have
https://web.git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/superm1/linux.git/commit/?h=amd-pstate-v6.15-2025-03-03&id=f6c0b760290951688697d9debbb2b8462c423a48,
in his tree, it fixed a corner case in the culprit commit that you pointed to.
Thanks,
Dhananjay
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* [Bug 219851] [amd-pstate 6.15] Frequency Scaling Will Not Scale Above Lowest Non-Linear Performance on Ryzen 7 5700U
2025-03-08 12:52 [Bug 219851] New: [amd-pstate 6.15] Frequency Scaling Will Not Scale Above Lowest Non-Linear Performance on Ryzen 7 5700U bugzilla-daemon
2025-03-08 12:52 ` [Bug 219851] " bugzilla-daemon
2025-03-10 5:13 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2025-03-10 15:41 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-03-11 4:27 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (2 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2025-03-10 15:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-pm
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=219851
--- Comment #3 from Eric Naim (dnaim@cachyos.org) ---
(In reply to Dhananjay Ugwekar (AMD) from comment #2)
> Hello Eric,
>
Hi Dhananjay,
Unfortunately the user that first reported this issue hasn't reached out to me
since, so for now I'll give you information regarding what I already know.
> 1. Could you please give more details on how to reproduce the issue? which
> governor, amd-pstate mode (when the issue was observed), workload. Are you
> able to reproduce the issue on your machine as well?
No STR was given, from the lack of info I believe it's just a general case,
e.g. if you run `stress-ng -c $(nproc)`, you *should* see the issue (entirely
speculation). This regression only happens with the active driver. Both passive
and guided mode was reported to behave correctly.
I can't reproduce this either because my laptop is a Zen3 laptop. It is likely
that it is limited to Zen2.
> 2. Just to confirm, does the user have
> https://web.git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/superm1/linux.git/commit/
> ?h=amd-pstate-v6.15-2025-03-03&id=f6c0b760290951688697d9debbb2b8462c423a48,
> in his tree, it fixed a corner case in the culprit commit that you pointed
> to.
Yes, you can see the related tree
https://github.com/CachyOS/linux/tree/6.14/amd-pstate. It's not 1:1 with
Mario's tree but I diffed both trees and the only difference was commit
34562659110a42276d63f8b5a9d522d2400b2df2 which is from the "Dynamic ITMT core
ranking support" series.
>
> Thanks,
> Dhananjay
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* [Bug 219851] [amd-pstate 6.15] Frequency Scaling Will Not Scale Above Lowest Non-Linear Performance on Ryzen 7 5700U
2025-03-08 12:52 [Bug 219851] New: [amd-pstate 6.15] Frequency Scaling Will Not Scale Above Lowest Non-Linear Performance on Ryzen 7 5700U bugzilla-daemon
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2025-03-10 15:41 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2025-03-11 4:27 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-03-11 4:27 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-03-11 6:21 ` bugzilla-daemon
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2025-03-11 4:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-pm
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=219851
--- Comment #4 from Eric Naim (dnaim@cachyos.org) ---
(In reply to Dhananjay Ugwekar (AMD) from comment #2)
Hi Dhananjay,
> Hello Eric,
>
> 1. Could you please give more details on how to reproduce the issue? which
> governor, amd-pstate mode (when the issue was observed), workload. Are you
> able to reproduce the issue on your machine as well?
> 2. Just to confirm, does the user have
> https://web.git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/superm1/linux.git/commit/
> ?h=amd-pstate-v6.15-2025-03-03&id=f6c0b760290951688697d9debbb2b8462c423a48,
> in his tree, it fixed a corner case in the culprit commit that you pointed
> to.
It looks like the user didn't have that commit after all. They were using an
older revision of the patchset that didn't have the updated amd-pstate commits.
I should've asked them to crosscheck their issue with the kernel in our
repositories first. Sorry to have wasted your time. I'm going to close this as
invalid.
>
> Thanks,
> Dhananjay
Regards,
Eric
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* [Bug 219851] [amd-pstate 6.15] Frequency Scaling Will Not Scale Above Lowest Non-Linear Performance on Ryzen 7 5700U
2025-03-08 12:52 [Bug 219851] New: [amd-pstate 6.15] Frequency Scaling Will Not Scale Above Lowest Non-Linear Performance on Ryzen 7 5700U bugzilla-daemon
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2025-03-11 4:27 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2025-03-11 4:27 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-03-11 6:21 ` bugzilla-daemon
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2025-03-11 4:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-pm
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=219851
Eric Naim (dnaim@cachyos.org) changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |INVALID
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* [Bug 219851] [amd-pstate 6.15] Frequency Scaling Will Not Scale Above Lowest Non-Linear Performance on Ryzen 7 5700U
2025-03-08 12:52 [Bug 219851] New: [amd-pstate 6.15] Frequency Scaling Will Not Scale Above Lowest Non-Linear Performance on Ryzen 7 5700U bugzilla-daemon
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2025-03-11 4:27 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2025-03-11 6:21 ` bugzilla-daemon
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2025-03-11 6:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-pm
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=219851
--- Comment #5 from Dhananjay Ugwekar (AMD) (Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com) ---
No worries, happy to help.
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread