From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sudeep Holla Subject: Re: [Discussion] Performance levels of power domains Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 12:21:01 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20161026111642.GM9162@vireshk-i7> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:37882 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752203AbcJZLVD (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Oct 2016 07:21:03 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20161026111642.GM9162@vireshk-i7> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: Viresh Kumar Cc: Sudeep Holla , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , Lists linaro-kernel , Stephen Boyd , Michael Turquette , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Mark Brown , "Nayak, Rajendra" , Georgi Djakov On 26/10/16 12:16, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 26-10-16, 12:09, Sudeep Holla wrote: [...] >> I am mainly interested as there are efforts to standardize these >> communication with M3 and there's WIP protocol development[1]. It would >> be good to see if this user-case is also considered. > > What do you mean by that ? Basically I wanted to know more details so that such system are also considered(I agree it may not have any impact on the protocol at all, but still good to consider them) when designing this new SCMI protocol. -- Regards, Sudeep