From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Viresh Kumar Subject: [PATCH 06/34] cpufreq: cpu0: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition() Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 07:55:03 +0530 Message-ID: References: Return-path: Received: from mail-pd0-f180.google.com ([209.85.192.180]:54416 "EHLO mail-pd0-f180.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754267Ab3HPC0g (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Aug 2013 22:26:36 -0400 Received: by mail-pd0-f180.google.com with SMTP id y10so1581757pdj.39 for ; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 19:26:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: References: Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: rjw@sisk.pl Cc: linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, patches@linaro.org, cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Viresh Kumar , Shawn Guo Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines: struct cpufreq_freqs freqs; freqs.old = old freq... freqs.new = new freq... cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE); /* Change rate here */ cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE); This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead. Earlier patches have added support in cpufreq core to do cpufreq notification on frequency change, this one removes it from this driver. Some related minor cleanups are also done along with it. Cc: Shawn Guo Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar --- drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.c | 33 ++++++++++++--------------------- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.c index 4014925..ddd9010 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.c @@ -36,20 +36,19 @@ static unsigned int cpu0_get_speed(unsigned int cpu) static int cpu0_set_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index) { - struct cpufreq_freqs freqs; struct opp *opp; unsigned long volt = 0, volt_old = 0, tol = 0; + unsigned int old_freq, new_freq; long freq_Hz, freq_exact; int ret; freq_Hz = clk_round_rate(cpu_clk, freq_table[index].frequency * 1000); if (freq_Hz < 0) freq_Hz = freq_table[index].frequency * 1000; - freq_exact = freq_Hz; - freqs.new = freq_Hz / 1000; - freqs.old = clk_get_rate(cpu_clk) / 1000; - cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE); + freq_exact = freq_Hz; + new_freq = freq_Hz / 1000; + old_freq = clk_get_rate(cpu_clk) / 1000; if (!IS_ERR(cpu_reg)) { rcu_read_lock(); @@ -57,9 +56,7 @@ static int cpu0_set_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index) if (IS_ERR(opp)) { rcu_read_unlock(); pr_err("failed to find OPP for %ld\n", freq_Hz); - freqs.new = freqs.old; - ret = PTR_ERR(opp); - goto post_notify; + return PTR_ERR(opp); } volt = opp_get_voltage(opp); rcu_read_unlock(); @@ -68,16 +65,15 @@ static int cpu0_set_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index) } pr_debug("%u MHz, %ld mV --> %u MHz, %ld mV\n", - freqs.old / 1000, volt_old ? volt_old / 1000 : -1, - freqs.new / 1000, volt ? volt / 1000 : -1); + old_freq / 1000, volt_old ? volt_old / 1000 : -1, + new_freq / 1000, volt ? volt / 1000 : -1); /* scaling up? scale voltage before frequency */ - if (!IS_ERR(cpu_reg) && freqs.new > freqs.old) { + if (!IS_ERR(cpu_reg) && new_freq > old_freq) { ret = regulator_set_voltage_tol(cpu_reg, volt, tol); if (ret) { pr_err("failed to scale voltage up: %d\n", ret); - freqs.new = freqs.old; - goto post_notify; + return ret; } } @@ -86,23 +82,18 @@ static int cpu0_set_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index) pr_err("failed to set clock rate: %d\n", ret); if (!IS_ERR(cpu_reg)) regulator_set_voltage_tol(cpu_reg, volt_old, tol); - freqs.new = freqs.old; - goto post_notify; + return ret; } /* scaling down? scale voltage after frequency */ - if (!IS_ERR(cpu_reg) && freqs.new < freqs.old) { + if (!IS_ERR(cpu_reg) && new_freq < old_freq) { ret = regulator_set_voltage_tol(cpu_reg, volt, tol); if (ret) { pr_err("failed to scale voltage down: %d\n", ret); - clk_set_rate(cpu_clk, freqs.old * 1000); - freqs.new = freqs.old; + clk_set_rate(cpu_clk, old_freq * 1000); } } -post_notify: - cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE); - return ret; } -- 1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e