linux-pm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: Rafael Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	sboyd@codeaurora.org, prarit@redhat.com, skannan@codeaurora.org,
	Srivatsa Bhat <srivatsa@mit.edu>,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Subject: [PATCH V3 13/14] cpufreq: Restart governor as soon as possible
Date: Fri,  8 May 2015 11:53:56 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c4c32c35edc752eb10453e9686fda9ed50fdcc98.1431065963.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1431065963.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
In-Reply-To: <cover.1431065963.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

On cpu hot-unplug, we don't need to wait for POST_DEAD notification to
restart the governor if the policy has atleast one online cpu left. We
can restart the governor right from the DOWN_PREPARE notification
instead.

[ Something similar attempted by Saravana earlier ]

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index 6f08b70de21f..6bbc7b112e7a 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -1395,8 +1395,8 @@ static int cpufreq_add_dev(struct device *dev, struct subsys_interface *sif)
 static int __cpufreq_remove_dev_prepare(struct device *dev,
 					struct subsys_interface *sif)
 {
-	unsigned int cpu = dev->id, cpus;
-	int ret;
+	unsigned int cpu = dev->id;
+	int ret = 0;
 	struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
 
 	pr_debug("%s: unregistering CPU %u\n", __func__, cpu);
@@ -1416,26 +1416,33 @@ static int __cpufreq_remove_dev_prepare(struct device *dev,
 	}
 
 	down_write(&policy->rwsem);
-	cpus = cpumask_weight(policy->cpus);
+	cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, policy->cpus);
 
-	if (has_target() && cpus == 1)
-		strncpy(policy->last_governor, policy->governor->name,
-			CPUFREQ_NAME_LEN);
+	if (policy_is_inactive(policy)) {
+		if (has_target())
+			strncpy(policy->last_governor, policy->governor->name,
+				CPUFREQ_NAME_LEN);
+	} else if (cpu == policy->cpu) {
+		/* Nominate new CPU */
+		policy->cpu = cpumask_any(policy->cpus);
+	}
 	up_write(&policy->rwsem);
 
-	if (cpu != policy->cpu)
-		return 0;
+	/* Start governor again for active policy */
+	if (!policy_is_inactive(policy)) {
+		if (has_target()) {
+			ret = __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_START);
+			if (!ret)
+				ret = __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS);
 
-	if (cpus > 1) {
-		/* Nominate new CPU */
-		down_write(&policy->rwsem);
-		policy->cpu = cpumask_any_but(policy->cpus, cpu);
-		up_write(&policy->rwsem);
+			if (ret)
+				pr_err("%s: Failed to start governor\n", __func__);
+		}
 	} else if (cpufreq_driver->stop_cpu) {
 		cpufreq_driver->stop_cpu(policy);
 	}
 
-	return 0;
+	return ret;
 }
 
 static int __cpufreq_remove_dev_finish(struct device *dev,
@@ -1443,33 +1450,16 @@ static int __cpufreq_remove_dev_finish(struct device *dev,
 {
 	unsigned int cpu = dev->id;
 	int ret;
-	struct cpufreq_policy *policy = cpufreq_cpu_get_raw(cpu);
+	struct cpufreq_policy *policy = per_cpu(cpufreq_cpu_data, cpu);
 
 	if (!policy) {
 		pr_debug("%s: No cpu_data found\n", __func__);
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
-	down_write(&policy->rwsem);
-	cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, policy->cpus);
-	up_write(&policy->rwsem);
-
-	/* Not the last cpu of policy, start governor again ? */
-	if (!policy_is_inactive(policy)) {
-		if (!has_target())
-			return 0;
-
-		ret = __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_START);
-		if (!ret)
-			ret = __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS);
-
-		if (ret) {
-			pr_err("%s: Failed to start governor\n", __func__);
-			return ret;
-		}
-
+	/* Only proceed for inactive policies */
+	if (!policy_is_inactive(policy))
 		return 0;
-	}
 
 	/* If cpu is last user of policy, free policy */
 	if (has_target()) {
-- 
2.4.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-05-08  6:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-08  6:23 [PATCH V3 00/14] cpufreq: Don't loose cpufreq history on CPU hotplug Viresh Kumar
2015-05-08  6:23 ` [PATCH V3 01/14] cpufreq: Create for_each_{in}active_policy() Viresh Kumar
2015-05-08 21:46   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-05-09  2:27     ` Viresh Kumar
2015-05-12  6:04     ` Viresh Kumar
2015-05-12  6:50   ` [PATCH V4 " Viresh Kumar
2015-05-08  6:23 ` [PATCH V3 02/14] cpufreq: Don't clear cpufreq_cpu_data and policy list for inactive policies Viresh Kumar
2015-05-08  6:23 ` [PATCH V3 03/14] cpufreq: Get rid of cpufreq_cpu_data_fallback Viresh Kumar
2015-05-08  6:23 ` [PATCH V3 04/14] cpufreq: Don't traverse all active policies to find policy for a cpu Viresh Kumar
2015-05-12  6:52   ` [PATCH V4 " Viresh Kumar
2015-05-08  6:23 ` [PATCH V3 05/14] cpufreq: Manage governor usage history with 'policy->last_governor' Viresh Kumar
2015-05-12  6:52   ` [PATCH V4 " Viresh Kumar
2015-05-08  6:23 ` [PATCH V3 06/14] cpufreq: Mark policy->governor = NULL for inactive policies Viresh Kumar
2015-05-12  6:52   ` [PATCH V4 " Viresh Kumar
2015-05-08  6:23 ` [PATCH V3 07/14] cpufreq: Don't allow updating inactive-policies from sysfs Viresh Kumar
2015-05-16  1:10   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-05-16  2:01     ` Viresh Kumar
2015-05-08  6:23 ` [PATCH V3 08/14] cpufreq: Track cpu managing sysfs kobjects separately Viresh Kumar
2015-05-08  6:23 ` [PATCH V3 09/14] cpufreq: Stop migrating sysfs files on hotplug Viresh Kumar
2015-05-08  6:23 ` [PATCH V3 10/14] cpufreq: Remove cpufreq_update_policy() Viresh Kumar
2015-05-08  6:23 ` [PATCH V3 11/14] cpufreq: Initialize policy->kobj while allocating policy Viresh Kumar
2015-05-08  6:23 ` [PATCH V3 12/14] cpufreq: Call cpufreq_policy_put_kobj() from cpufreq_policy_free() Viresh Kumar
2015-05-08  6:23 ` Viresh Kumar [this message]
2015-05-08  6:23 ` [PATCH V3 14/14] cpufreq: Add support for physical hoplug of CPUs Viresh Kumar
2015-05-16  1:18   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-05-16  2:13     ` Viresh Kumar
2015-05-18  0:30       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-05-18  2:11         ` Viresh Kumar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c4c32c35edc752eb10453e9686fda9ed50fdcc98.1431065963.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    --to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    --cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=prarit@redhat.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=skannan@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=srivatsa@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).