From: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: webgeek1234@gmail.com, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] cpufreq: tegra124: Allow building as a module
Date: Tue, 20 May 2025 12:46:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c4dc20c6-d0cd-4a2f-81be-e672ace75e67@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250520103035.udl25zv2uriljrby@vireshk-i7>
On 20/05/2025 11:30, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 20-05-25, 11:03, Jon Hunter wrote:
>> On 19/05/2025 11:26, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>>> Not sure if we can do that. The clks belong to the CPU device, while
>>> the devm_* functions are using &pdev->dev. The CPU device never goes
>>> away and so the resources won't get freed if we use devm for the CPU
>>> device.
>
> That would have been the case, if we can actually do a devm_clk_get()
> in the first place, but...
>
>> I don't follow. If they are allocated in the probe using the pdev->dev
>> device by using devm_clk_get() they should get freed when the platform
>> device is removed.
>
> ... devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, ...) won't work here IIUC. The clks
> belong to the CPU device and not pdev->dev. That's why we are doing
> of_clk_get_by_name() over the CPU device's OF node here.
>
> Maybe I am wrong, but I don't see how devm_* can be used here for
> clks.
Ah yes, we are using the 'np' pointer for the CPU node and not the
platform device node. OK scratch that.
Jon
--
nvpublic
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-20 11:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-09 0:04 [PATCH v4 0/2] Support building tegra124-cpufreq as a module Aaron Kling via B4 Relay
2025-05-09 0:04 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] cpufreq: tegra124: Remove use of disable_cpufreq Aaron Kling via B4 Relay
2025-05-09 11:04 ` Jon Hunter
2025-05-09 16:57 ` Aaron Kling
2025-05-14 16:26 ` Aaron Kling
2025-05-19 10:17 ` Viresh Kumar
2025-05-20 9:53 ` Jon Hunter
2025-05-20 10:02 ` Viresh Kumar
2025-05-28 17:29 ` Aaron Kling
2025-05-29 5:16 ` Viresh Kumar
2025-06-05 10:34 ` Jon Hunter
2025-06-05 10:51 ` Viresh Kumar
2025-06-30 18:43 ` Aaron Kling
2025-07-01 6:23 ` Viresh Kumar
2025-05-09 0:04 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] cpufreq: tegra124: Allow building as a module Aaron Kling via B4 Relay
2025-05-09 13:37 ` Jon Hunter
2025-05-13 4:26 ` Aaron Kling
2025-05-14 10:31 ` Jon Hunter
2025-05-14 16:43 ` Aaron Kling
2025-05-15 6:41 ` Jon Hunter
2025-05-19 10:37 ` Viresh Kumar
2025-05-20 9:57 ` Jon Hunter
2025-05-20 10:33 ` Viresh Kumar
2025-05-20 15:38 ` Aaron Kling
2025-05-14 10:31 ` Jon Hunter
2025-05-14 16:30 ` Aaron Kling
2025-05-15 6:21 ` Jon Hunter
2025-05-19 10:26 ` Viresh Kumar
2025-05-20 10:03 ` Jon Hunter
2025-05-20 10:30 ` Viresh Kumar
2025-05-20 11:46 ` Jon Hunter [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c4dc20c6-d0cd-4a2f-81be-e672ace75e67@nvidia.com \
--to=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=webgeek1234@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox