From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: Rafael Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Preeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
ke.wang@spreadtrum.com
Cc: linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com, paulus@samba.org,
shilpa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com, prarit@redhat.com,
robert.schoene@tu-dresden.de, skannan@codeaurora.org,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Subject: [PATCH 08/12] cpufreq: governor: synchronize work-handler with governor callbacks
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 16:21:51 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c8e5037760d45b96e059bf6fd150e2e23205ff76.1434019473.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1434019473.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
In-Reply-To: <cover.1434019473.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Currently the work-handler's for all the CPUs are synchronized with one
another but not with cpufreq_governor_dbs(). Both work-handlers and
cpufreq_governor_dbs() enqueue work. And these not being in sync is an
open invitation to all kind of races to come in.
So, this patch replaces 'timer_mutex' with 'cdata->mutex' so that both
work-handler and callback are in sync.
Also in update_sampling_rate() we are dropping the mutex while
canceling delayed-work. There is no need to do that, keep lock active
for the entire length of routine as that also enqueues works.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c | 14 +++-----------
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.h | 6 ------
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c | 13 ++++---------
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
index 08bb67225b85..aa24aa9a9eb3 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
@@ -228,13 +228,12 @@ static void dbs_timer(struct work_struct *work)
{
struct cpu_dbs_info *cdbs = container_of(work, struct cpu_dbs_info,
dwork.work);
- struct cpu_common_dbs_info *ccdbs = cdbs->ccdbs;
- struct cpufreq_policy *policy = ccdbs->policy;
+ struct cpufreq_policy *policy = cdbs->ccdbs->policy;
struct dbs_data *dbs_data = policy->governor_data;
unsigned int sampling_rate, delay;
bool modify_all = true;
- mutex_lock(&ccdbs->timer_mutex);
+ mutex_lock(&dbs_data->cdata->mutex);
if (dbs_data->cdata->governor == GOV_CONSERVATIVE) {
struct cs_dbs_tuners *cs_tuners = dbs_data->tuners;
@@ -252,7 +251,7 @@ static void dbs_timer(struct work_struct *work)
delay = dbs_data->cdata->gov_dbs_timer(cdbs, dbs_data, modify_all);
gov_queue_work(dbs_data, policy, delay, modify_all);
- mutex_unlock(&ccdbs->timer_mutex);
+ mutex_unlock(&dbs_data->cdata->mutex);
}
static void set_sampling_rate(struct dbs_data *dbs_data,
@@ -424,7 +423,6 @@ static int cpufreq_governor_start(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
}
ccdbs->time_stamp = ktime_get();
- mutex_init(&ccdbs->timer_mutex);
for_each_cpu(j, policy->cpus) {
struct cpu_dbs_info *j_cdbs = cdata->get_cpu_cdbs(j);
@@ -470,8 +468,6 @@ static void cpufreq_governor_stop(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
{
struct common_dbs_data *cdata = dbs_data->cdata;
unsigned int cpu = policy->cpu;
- struct cpu_dbs_info *cdbs = cdata->get_cpu_cdbs(cpu);
- struct cpu_common_dbs_info *ccdbs = cdbs->ccdbs;
gov_cancel_work(dbs_data, policy);
@@ -481,8 +477,6 @@ static void cpufreq_governor_stop(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
cs_dbs_info->enable = 0;
}
-
- mutex_destroy(&ccdbs->timer_mutex);
}
static void cpufreq_governor_limits(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
@@ -495,7 +489,6 @@ static void cpufreq_governor_limits(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
if (!cdbs->ccdbs)
return;
- mutex_lock(&cdbs->ccdbs->timer_mutex);
if (policy->max < cdbs->ccdbs->policy->cur)
__cpufreq_driver_target(cdbs->ccdbs->policy, policy->max,
CPUFREQ_RELATION_H);
@@ -503,7 +496,6 @@ static void cpufreq_governor_limits(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
__cpufreq_driver_target(cdbs->ccdbs->policy, policy->min,
CPUFREQ_RELATION_L);
dbs_check_cpu(dbs_data, cpu);
- mutex_unlock(&cdbs->ccdbs->timer_mutex);
}
int cpufreq_governor_dbs(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.h b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.h
index 2125c299c602..2b2884f91fe7 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.h
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.h
@@ -131,12 +131,6 @@ static void *get_cpu_dbs_info_s(int cpu) \
/* Common to all CPUs of a policy */
struct cpu_common_dbs_info {
struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
- /*
- * percpu mutex that serializes governor limit change with dbs_timer
- * invocation. We do not want dbs_timer to run when user is changing
- * the governor or limits.
- */
- struct mutex timer_mutex;
ktime_t time_stamp;
};
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
index 11db20079fc6..87813830e169 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
@@ -249,6 +249,8 @@ static void update_sampling_rate(struct dbs_data *dbs_data,
struct od_dbs_tuners *od_tuners = dbs_data->tuners;
int cpu;
+ mutex_lock(&dbs_data->cdata->mutex);
+
od_tuners->sampling_rate = new_rate = max(new_rate,
dbs_data->min_sampling_rate);
@@ -267,28 +269,21 @@ static void update_sampling_rate(struct dbs_data *dbs_data,
dbs_info = &per_cpu(od_cpu_dbs_info, cpu);
cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
- mutex_lock(&dbs_info->cdbs.ccdbs->timer_mutex);
-
- if (!delayed_work_pending(&dbs_info->cdbs.dwork)) {
- mutex_unlock(&dbs_info->cdbs.ccdbs->timer_mutex);
+ if (!delayed_work_pending(&dbs_info->cdbs.dwork))
continue;
- }
next_sampling = jiffies + usecs_to_jiffies(new_rate);
appointed_at = dbs_info->cdbs.dwork.timer.expires;
if (time_before(next_sampling, appointed_at)) {
- mutex_unlock(&dbs_info->cdbs.ccdbs->timer_mutex);
cancel_delayed_work_sync(&dbs_info->cdbs.dwork);
- mutex_lock(&dbs_info->cdbs.ccdbs->timer_mutex);
-
gov_queue_work(dbs_data, policy,
usecs_to_jiffies(new_rate), true);
}
- mutex_unlock(&dbs_info->cdbs.ccdbs->timer_mutex);
}
+ mutex_unlock(&dbs_data->cdata->mutex);
}
static ssize_t store_sampling_rate(struct dbs_data *dbs_data, const char *buf,
--
2.4.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-11 10:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-11 10:51 [PATCH 00/12] cpufreq: Fix governor races - part 2 Viresh Kumar
2015-06-11 10:51 ` [PATCH 01/12] cpufreq: governor: Name delayed-work as dwork Viresh Kumar
2015-06-15 3:01 ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-06-11 10:51 ` [PATCH 02/12] cpufreq: governor: Drop unused field 'cpu' Viresh Kumar
2015-06-15 3:12 ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-06-11 10:51 ` [PATCH 03/12] cpufreq: governor: Rename 'cpu_dbs_common_info' to 'cpu_dbs_info' Viresh Kumar
2015-06-18 6:52 ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-06-11 10:51 ` [PATCH 04/12] cpufreq: governor: name pointer to cpu_dbs_info as 'cdbs' Viresh Kumar
2015-06-15 4:22 ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-06-11 10:51 ` [PATCH 05/12] cpufreq: governor: rename cur_policy as policy Viresh Kumar
2015-06-15 4:24 ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-06-11 10:51 ` [PATCH 06/12] cpufreq: governor: Keep single copy of information common to policy->cpus Viresh Kumar
2015-06-15 6:15 ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-06-15 6:46 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-06-18 5:59 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-06-19 4:13 ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-06-11 10:51 ` [PATCH 07/12] cpufreq: governor: split out common part of {cs|od}_dbs_timer() Viresh Kumar
2015-06-15 7:03 ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-06-11 10:51 ` Viresh Kumar [this message]
2015-06-15 8:23 ` [PATCH 08/12] cpufreq: governor: synchronize work-handler with governor callbacks Preeti U Murthy
2015-06-15 8:31 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-06-11 10:51 ` [PATCH 09/12] cpufreq: governor: Avoid invalid states with additional checks Viresh Kumar
2015-06-15 8:59 ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-06-15 9:12 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-06-11 10:51 ` [PATCH 10/12] cpufreq: governor: Don't WARN on invalid states Viresh Kumar
2015-06-15 9:52 ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-06-11 10:51 ` [PATCH 11/12] cpufreq: propagate errors returned from __cpufreq_governor() Viresh Kumar
2015-06-15 10:30 ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-06-11 10:51 ` [PATCH 12/12] cpufreq: conservative: remove 'enable' field Viresh Kumar
2015-06-15 10:40 ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-06-15 4:49 ` [PATCH 00/12] cpufreq: Fix governor races - part 2 Preeti U Murthy
2015-06-15 5:45 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-06-15 23:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-06-16 2:10 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-06-18 5:19 ` Viresh Kumar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c8e5037760d45b96e059bf6fd150e2e23205ff76.1434019473.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=ke.wang@spreadtrum.com \
--cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=prarit@redhat.com \
--cc=preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=robert.schoene@tu-dresden.de \
--cc=shilpa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=skannan@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).