* [PATCH v2] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Fix per-policy boost flag incorrect when fail
@ 2025-01-10 9:19 Lifeng Zheng
2025-01-10 15:51 ` Mario Limonciello
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Lifeng Zheng @ 2025-01-10 9:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rafael, viresh.kumar, mario.limonciello, perry.yuan
Cc: linux-pm, linux-kernel, linuxarm, jonathan.cameron, zhanjie9,
lihuisong, zhenglifeng1, fanghao11
Commit c8c68c38b56f ("cpufreq: amd-pstate: initialize core precision
boost state") sets per-policy boost flag to false when boost fail.
However, this boost flag will be set to reverse value in
store_local_boost() and cpufreq_boost_trigger_state() in cpufreq.c. This
will cause the per-policy boost flag set to true when fail to set boost.
Remove the extra assignment in amd_pstate_set_boost() and keep all
operations on per-policy boost flag outside of set_boost() to fix this
problem.
Fixes: c8c68c38b56f ("cpufreq: amd-pstate: initialize core precision boost state")
Signed-off-by: Lifeng Zheng <zhenglifeng1@huawei.com>
---
drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c
index d7b1de97727a..a2573393ce30 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c
@@ -747,7 +747,6 @@ static int amd_pstate_set_boost(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, int state)
guard(mutex)(&amd_pstate_driver_lock);
ret = amd_pstate_cpu_boost_update(policy, state);
- policy->boost_enabled = !ret ? state : false;
refresh_frequency_limits(policy);
return ret;
--
2.17.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Fix per-policy boost flag incorrect when fail
2025-01-10 9:19 [PATCH v2] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Fix per-policy boost flag incorrect when fail Lifeng Zheng
@ 2025-01-10 15:51 ` Mario Limonciello
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Mario Limonciello @ 2025-01-10 15:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lifeng Zheng, rafael, viresh.kumar, perry.yuan
Cc: linux-pm, linux-kernel, linuxarm, jonathan.cameron, zhanjie9,
lihuisong, fanghao11
On 1/10/2025 03:19, Lifeng Zheng wrote:
> Commit c8c68c38b56f ("cpufreq: amd-pstate: initialize core precision
> boost state") sets per-policy boost flag to false when boost fail.
> However, this boost flag will be set to reverse value in
> store_local_boost() and cpufreq_boost_trigger_state() in cpufreq.c. This
> will cause the per-policy boost flag set to true when fail to set boost.
> Remove the extra assignment in amd_pstate_set_boost() and keep all
> operations on per-policy boost flag outside of set_boost() to fix this
> problem.
>
> Fixes: c8c68c38b56f ("cpufreq: amd-pstate: initialize core precision boost state")
> Signed-off-by: Lifeng Zheng <zhenglifeng1@huawei.com>
Thanks, looks good to me. I've queued this up on my bleeding-edge
branch for testing. I'll include this in one of the future 6.14-rc pull
requests with other fixes.
Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c
> index d7b1de97727a..a2573393ce30 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c
> @@ -747,7 +747,6 @@ static int amd_pstate_set_boost(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, int state)
> guard(mutex)(&amd_pstate_driver_lock);
>
> ret = amd_pstate_cpu_boost_update(policy, state);
> - policy->boost_enabled = !ret ? state : false;
> refresh_frequency_limits(policy);
>
> return ret;
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-01-10 15:51 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-01-10 9:19 [PATCH v2] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Fix per-policy boost flag incorrect when fail Lifeng Zheng
2025-01-10 15:51 ` Mario Limonciello
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).