From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Viresh Kumar Subject: [PATCH 025/228] cpufreq: kirkwood: use cpufreq_table_validate_and_show() Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 18:29:31 +0530 Message-ID: References: Return-path: Received: from mail-pa0-f48.google.com ([209.85.220.48]:56002 "EHLO mail-pa0-f48.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757478Ab3IMNGC (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Sep 2013 09:06:02 -0400 Received: by mail-pa0-f48.google.com with SMTP id kp13so2492932pab.7 for ; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 06:06:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: References: Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: rjw@sisk.pl Cc: linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, patches@linaro.org, cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Viresh Kumar Lets use cpufreq_table_validate_and_show() instead of calling cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo() and cpufreq_frequency_table_get_attr(). Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar --- drivers/cpufreq/kirkwood-cpufreq.c | 10 +--------- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/kirkwood-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/kirkwood-cpufreq.c index ba10658..59cbb35 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/kirkwood-cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/kirkwood-cpufreq.c @@ -125,19 +125,11 @@ static int kirkwood_cpufreq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, /* Module init and exit code */ static int kirkwood_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) { - int result; - /* cpuinfo and default policy values */ policy->cpuinfo.transition_latency = 5000; /* 5uS */ policy->cur = kirkwood_cpufreq_get_cpu_frequency(0); - result = cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo(policy, kirkwood_freq_table); - if (result) - return result; - - cpufreq_frequency_table_get_attr(kirkwood_freq_table, policy->cpu); - - return 0; + return cpufreq_table_validate_and_show(policy, kirkwood_freq_table); } static int kirkwood_cpufreq_cpu_exit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) -- 1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e