From: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
To: Perry Yuan <perry.yuan@amd.com>,
gautham.shenoy@amd.com, Borislav.Petkov@amd.com
Cc: rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com, viresh.kumar@linaro.org,
Alexander.Deucher@amd.com, Xinmei.Huang@amd.com,
Xiaojian.Du@amd.com, Li.Meng@amd.com, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 3/9] cpufreq: introduce init_boost callback to initialize boost state for pstate drivers
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2024 12:55:20 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cc26e5fd-ee67-4720-bc58-322fa1ed0329@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <688d8e1ce875655c344ac3b29876da5dc0456739.1718262992.git.perry.yuan@amd.com>
On 6/13/2024 02:25, Perry Yuan wrote:
> Introduce a new init_boost callback in cpufreq to initialize the boost
> state for specific pstate drivers. This initialization is required before
> calling the set_boost interface for each CPU.
>
> The init_boost callback will set up and synchronize each CPU's current
> boost state before invoking the set_boost function. Without this step,
> the boost state may be inconsistent across CPUs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Perry Yuan <perry.yuan@amd.com>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 12 ++++++++++--
> include/linux/cpufreq.h | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> index 1fdabb660231..e1a4730f4f8c 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> @@ -1429,8 +1429,16 @@ static int cpufreq_online(unsigned int cpu)
> goto out_free_policy;
> }
>
> - /* Let the per-policy boost flag mirror the cpufreq_driver boost during init */
> - policy->boost_enabled = cpufreq_boost_enabled() && policy_has_boost_freq(policy);
> + /* init boost state to prepare set_boost callback for each CPU */
> + if (cpufreq_driver->init_boost) {
> + ret = cpufreq_driver->init_boost(policy);
> + if (ret)
> + pr_debug("%s: %d: initialization boost failed\n", __func__,
> + __LINE__);
The message should have the subject at the beginning. IE:
"boost initialization failed\n"
Also, isn't this fatal if init failed? IE shouldn't failing have a:
goto out_free_policy;
> + } else {
> + /* Let the per-policy boost flag mirror the cpufreq_driver boost during init */
> + policy->boost_enabled = cpufreq_boost_enabled() && policy_has_boost_freq(policy);
> + }
>
> /*
> * The initialization has succeeded and the policy is online.
> diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> index 20f7e98ee8af..0698c0292d8f 100644
> --- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> +++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> @@ -409,6 +409,8 @@ struct cpufreq_driver {
> bool boost_enabled;
> int (*set_boost)(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, int state);
>
> + /* initialize boost state to be consistent before calling set_boost */
> + int (*init_boost)(struct cpufreq_policy *policy);
> /*
> * Set by drivers that want to register with the energy model after the
> * policy is properly initialized, but before the governor is started.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-13 17:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-13 7:25 [PATCH v11 0/9] AMD Pstate Driver Core Performance Boost Perry Yuan
2024-06-13 7:25 ` [PATCH v11 1/9] cpufreq: acpi: move MSR_K7_HWCR_CPB_DIS_BIT into msr-index.h Perry Yuan
2024-06-13 7:25 ` [PATCH v11 2/9] cpufreq: simplify boolean parsing with kstrtobool in store function Perry Yuan
2024-06-13 17:55 ` Mario Limonciello
2024-06-13 7:25 ` [PATCH v11 3/9] cpufreq: introduce init_boost callback to initialize boost state for pstate drivers Perry Yuan
2024-06-13 17:55 ` Mario Limonciello [this message]
2024-06-14 2:43 ` Yuan, Perry
2024-06-19 3:46 ` Yuan, Perry
2024-06-13 7:25 ` [PATCH v11 4/9] cpufreq: amd-pstate: initialize new core precision boost state Perry Yuan
2024-06-13 17:55 ` Mario Limonciello
2024-06-14 3:32 ` Yuan, Perry
2024-06-13 7:25 ` [PATCH v11 5/9] cpufreq: amd-pstate: implement cpb_boost sysfs entry for boost control Perry Yuan
2024-06-13 17:55 ` Mario Limonciello
2024-06-14 2:32 ` Yuan, Perry
2024-06-13 7:25 ` [PATCH v11 6/9] cpufreq: amd-pstate: Add set_boost callback for active mode Perry Yuan
2024-06-13 17:52 ` Mario Limonciello
2024-06-14 2:28 ` Yuan, Perry
2024-06-13 7:25 ` [PATCH v11 7/9] cpufreq: amd-pstate: fix the MSR highest perf will be reset issue while cpb boost off Perry Yuan
2024-06-13 7:25 ` [PATCH v11 8/9] Documentation: cpufreq: amd-pstate: introduce the new cpu boost control method Perry Yuan
2024-06-13 17:53 ` Mario Limonciello
2024-06-13 7:25 ` [PATCH v11 9/9] Documentation: cpufreq: amd-pstate: update doc for Per CPU " Perry Yuan
2024-06-13 17:53 ` Mario Limonciello
2024-06-13 17:54 ` [PATCH v11 0/9] AMD Pstate Driver Core Performance Boost Mario Limonciello
2024-06-14 3:18 ` Yuan, Perry
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cc26e5fd-ee67-4720-bc58-322fa1ed0329@amd.com \
--to=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=Alexander.Deucher@amd.com \
--cc=Borislav.Petkov@amd.com \
--cc=Li.Meng@amd.com \
--cc=Xiaojian.Du@amd.com \
--cc=Xinmei.Huang@amd.com \
--cc=gautham.shenoy@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=perry.yuan@amd.com \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).