From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from madrid.collaboradmins.com (madrid.collaboradmins.com [46.235.227.194]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 664CBF9D1; Mon, 12 Feb 2024 08:53:58 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=46.235.227.194 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1707728039; cv=none; b=Ivj6wQ3v7n0CV/XMMdD9Lc0TeKEtvLFbwcJTs4JcVA1bgd7vn04cbjI2YKIkIBrv669rUPEFxuhcF+XLdbKdLEpe6E1OkWhKLOx+XFaoG6f3xJV6DSgEKE1Fm7TaUjrgBx57eUrYMoVMQ3g/zyD5S4Wd+kmTkdfd52sfxf8CbXc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1707728039; c=relaxed/simple; bh=7piWbCGcMV8jXNFfjDe8eSN9IgwzXBxHsFlz7ti4esk=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=FKTWfH0NRtb4SUUtz17P3gObCVuJ/lVMik/bOLqNu/ofu7z5lhyYb8XbpadEQ1n521Zqxs5iFkp3CcibdhH1Sw4O6KQdJsu+41qKzlXBY67+3mft4E8PVEdkwaPkvIR3RPsl/8k4cKCKs2X5uEmjk7OQaOpEu4ubxXzdOvr8N1U= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=collabora.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=collabora.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=collabora.com header.i=@collabora.com header.b=1178iJRL; arc=none smtp.client-ip=46.235.227.194 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=collabora.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=collabora.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=collabora.com header.i=@collabora.com header.b="1178iJRL" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=collabora.com; s=mail; t=1707728036; bh=7piWbCGcMV8jXNFfjDe8eSN9IgwzXBxHsFlz7ti4esk=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=1178iJRLXbbYR8AYKbv5sFIihYAc/ahj51fIrhXgT3ft6izjDupE9LvnKlJxm4Bfp 0VbEIFSQRHHqNZalSc7Vb5i+ezl17azKyJGxU3umGhSgPCi2ELmcmjxUUy+nW91CJ1 H346mHIjZrGLmQRur2D3DuotorEFq31G43LCRFlwQ5mCjlted4dJrqMv8yfNDRu9/Z 7036VddkvHloZF6ysL8jnJklrsPLJUbl8k2gmzpj6nXd8BQHDVVrLX2Q6FsJRdwxsi 7yjn/kmQdhpbIDymTnafGQ25UGYQsoJPoZ1r8oyaP67oHkiAm7HTVGLQBmPr1NevEG IawYeZ/SLVXJA== Received: from [100.113.186.2] (cola.collaboradmins.com [195.201.22.229]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: kholk11) by madrid.collaboradmins.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 66A5D378203F; Mon, 12 Feb 2024 08:53:55 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2024 09:53:54 +0100 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] dt-bindings: thermal: mediatek,thermal: document AUXADC 32k clock Content-Language: en-US To: =?UTF-8?B?UmFmYcWCIE1pxYJlY2tp?= , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Daniel Lezcano , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley Cc: Zhang Rui , Lukasz Luba , Matthias Brugger , Sascha Hauer , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, =?UTF-8?B?UmFmYcWCIE1pxYJlY2tp?= , Daniel Golle , Sam Shih References: <20240209055203.17144-1-zajec5@gmail.com> <17d143aa-576e-4d67-a0ea-b79f3518b81c@collabora.com> From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Il 12/02/24 07:11, Rafał Miłecki ha scritto: > On 9.02.2024 10:13, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote: >> Il 09/02/24 06:52, Rafał Miłecki ha scritto: >>> From: Rafał Miłecki >>> >>> SoCs MT7981 and MT7986 include a newer thermal block (V3) that requires >>> enabling one more clock called AUXADC 32k. Require it in binding. >>> >>> Cc: Daniel Golle >>> Cc: Sam Shih >>> Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki >> >> So, I've made some research on this matter.. and this is a NACK. > > Well, I can only thank you for the research. > > Let's drop this patch. I'll sort out the rest later. Thank you for bringing that up - this was necessary to clarify this and to actually make both of us aware of the mistake in the device trees that we have for those SoCs. Take your time, btw, you're doing a great job. Cheers, Angelo