From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Viresh Kumar Subject: [PATCH 01/17] cpufreq: remove dangling comment Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2015 12:34:22 +0530 Message-ID: References: Return-path: Received: from mail-pd0-f174.google.com ([209.85.192.174]:46876 "EHLO mail-pd0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750711AbbABHE6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Jan 2015 02:04:58 -0500 Received: by mail-pd0-f174.google.com with SMTP id fp1so23134894pdb.5 for ; Thu, 01 Jan 2015 23:04:58 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: References: Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: Rafael Wysocki Cc: linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, prarit@redhat.com, skannan@codeaurora.org, Viresh Kumar It doesn't make any sense at all and is a leftover of some earlier commit. Remove it. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar --- drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 4 ---- 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c index 6d97dffeaaf7..891672b913c8 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c @@ -2000,10 +2000,6 @@ int cpufreq_driver_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpufreq_driver_target); -/* - * when "event" is CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS - */ - static int __cpufreq_governor(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int event) { -- 2.2.0