From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Viresh Kumar Subject: [PATCH 0/5] cpufreq: sysfs cleanup Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2015 22:51:09 +0530 Message-ID: Return-path: Received: from mail-pa0-f46.google.com ([209.85.220.46]:35035 "EHLO mail-pa0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751966AbbJKRVX (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Oct 2015 13:21:23 -0400 Received: by pabve7 with SMTP id ve7so74360327pab.2 for ; Sun, 11 Oct 2015 10:21:23 -0700 (PDT) Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: Rafael Wysocki Cc: linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, skannan@codeaurora.org, Viresh Kumar Rafael, This is in response to the other thread where you and Saravana were discussing this. It doesn't allow updating policy for offline CPUs yet, but does cleanup the sysfs stuff. This is untested by me as I didn't had access to the hardware to test this week. But this is tested by Fengguang's build bot for some time now. Will be good if one of you can test this out. Viresh Kumar (5): cpufreq: Use cpumask_copy instead of cpumask_or to copy a mask cpufreq: create cpu/cpufreq at boot time cpufreq: remove cpufreq_sysfs_{create|remove}_file() cpufreq: create cpu/cpufreq/policyX directories cpufreq: Drop redundant check for inactive policies drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 95 +++++--------------------------------- drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c | 20 ++------ include/linux/cpufreq.h | 5 -- 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 104 deletions(-) -- 2.4.0