From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: Rafael Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>, juri.lelli@arm.com
Cc: linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
shilpa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Subject: [PATCH V5 0/6] cpufreq: Locking fixes and cleanups
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 17:31:10 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cover.1455191663.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> (raw)
Hi Rafael,
These are rest of the patches that fix some more locking issues with
policy->rwsem and do some minor optimization/cleanups.
V4->V5:
- Changelog updated for 1-2 as suggested by Rafael
- 4th patch is dropped, which moved common tunable callbacks to
cpufreq_governor.c
- 5-7 are resend on the V5 sent earlier, as reply to V4 of the series.
Viresh Kumar (6):
cpufreq: Merge cpufreq_offline_prepare/finish routines
cpufreq: Call __cpufreq_governor() with policy->rwsem held
cpufreq: Remove cpufreq_governor_lock
cpufreq: governor: No need to manage state machine now
cpufreq: conservative: Update sample_delay_ns immediately
cpufreq: ondemand: Rearrange od_dbs_timer() to avoid updating delay
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 93 ++++++++++++++++------------------
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c | 14 -----
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c | 90 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.h | 3 +-
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c | 78 ++--------------------------
5 files changed, 117 insertions(+), 161 deletions(-)
--
2.7.1.370.gb2aa7f8
next reply other threads:[~2016-02-11 12:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-11 12:01 Viresh Kumar [this message]
2016-02-11 12:01 ` [PATCH V5 1/6] cpufreq: Merge cpufreq_offline_prepare/finish routines Viresh Kumar
2016-02-11 12:01 ` [PATCH V5 2/6] cpufreq: Call __cpufreq_governor() with policy->rwsem held Viresh Kumar
2016-02-11 12:01 ` [PATCH V5 3/6] cpufreq: Remove cpufreq_governor_lock Viresh Kumar
2016-02-11 12:01 ` [PATCH V5 4/6] cpufreq: governor: No need to manage state machine now Viresh Kumar
2016-02-11 12:01 ` [PATCH V5 5/6] cpufreq: conservative: Update sample_delay_ns immediately Viresh Kumar
2016-02-11 12:01 ` [PATCH V5 6/6] cpufreq: ondemand: Rearrange od_dbs_timer() to avoid updating delay Viresh Kumar
2016-02-11 22:17 ` [PATCH V5 0/6] cpufreq: Locking fixes and cleanups Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cover.1455191663.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=juri.lelli@arm.com \
--cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=shilpa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).