linux-pm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH 0/3] cpufreq: Minor cleanups
@ 2016-02-22 11:06 Viresh Kumar
  2016-02-22 11:06 ` [PATCH 1/3] cpufreq: Relocate handle_update() to kill its declaration Viresh Kumar
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2016-02-22 11:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rafael Wysocki; +Cc: linaro-kernel, linux-pm, Viresh Kumar

Hi Rafael,

Here are a bunch of cleanups for cpufreq-core.

Viresh Kumar (3):
  cpufreq: Relocate handle_update() to kill its declaration
  cpufreq: Rename __cpufreq_governor() to cpufreq_governor()
  cpufreq: Remove 'policy->governor_enabled'

 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 80 ++++++++++++++++++-----------------------------
 include/linux/cpufreq.h   |  1 -
 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)

-- 
2.7.1.410.g6faf27b


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 1/3] cpufreq: Relocate handle_update() to kill its declaration
  2016-02-22 11:06 [PATCH 0/3] cpufreq: Minor cleanups Viresh Kumar
@ 2016-02-22 11:06 ` Viresh Kumar
  2016-02-22 11:06 ` [PATCH 2/3] cpufreq: Rename __cpufreq_governor() to cpufreq_governor() Viresh Kumar
  2016-02-22 11:06 ` [PATCH 3/3] cpufreq: Remove 'policy->governor_enabled' Viresh Kumar
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2016-02-22 11:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rafael Wysocki, Viresh Kumar; +Cc: linaro-kernel, linux-pm, linux-kernel

handle_update() is declared at the top of the file as its user appear
before its definition. Relocate the routine to get rid of this.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 19 +++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index 5ab9c5432113..3689b4dff967 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -121,7 +121,6 @@ static inline bool has_target(void)
 static int __cpufreq_governor(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
 		unsigned int event);
 static unsigned int __cpufreq_get(struct cpufreq_policy *policy);
-static void handle_update(struct work_struct *work);
 
 /**
  * Two notifier lists: the "policy" list is involved in the
@@ -1023,6 +1022,15 @@ static int cpufreq_add_policy_cpu(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int cp
 	return ret;
 }
 
+static void handle_update(struct work_struct *work)
+{
+	struct cpufreq_policy *policy =
+		container_of(work, struct cpufreq_policy, update);
+	unsigned int cpu = policy->cpu;
+	pr_debug("handle_update for cpu %u called\n", cpu);
+	cpufreq_update_policy(cpu);
+}
+
 static struct cpufreq_policy *cpufreq_policy_alloc(unsigned int cpu)
 {
 	struct device *dev = get_cpu_device(cpu);
@@ -1404,15 +1412,6 @@ static void cpufreq_remove_dev(struct device *dev, struct subsys_interface *sif)
 		cpufreq_policy_free(policy, true);
 }
 
-static void handle_update(struct work_struct *work)
-{
-	struct cpufreq_policy *policy =
-		container_of(work, struct cpufreq_policy, update);
-	unsigned int cpu = policy->cpu;
-	pr_debug("handle_update for cpu %u called\n", cpu);
-	cpufreq_update_policy(cpu);
-}
-
 /**
  *	cpufreq_out_of_sync - If actual and saved CPU frequency differs, we're
  *	in deep trouble.
-- 
2.7.1.410.g6faf27b


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 2/3] cpufreq: Rename __cpufreq_governor() to cpufreq_governor()
  2016-02-22 11:06 [PATCH 0/3] cpufreq: Minor cleanups Viresh Kumar
  2016-02-22 11:06 ` [PATCH 1/3] cpufreq: Relocate handle_update() to kill its declaration Viresh Kumar
@ 2016-02-22 11:06 ` Viresh Kumar
  2016-02-22 11:06 ` [PATCH 3/3] cpufreq: Remove 'policy->governor_enabled' Viresh Kumar
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2016-02-22 11:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rafael Wysocki, Viresh Kumar; +Cc: linaro-kernel, linux-pm, linux-kernel

The __ at the beginning of the routine aren't really necessary at all.
Rename it to cpufreq_governor() instead.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index 3689b4dff967..fa070bf87dd8 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -118,8 +118,7 @@ static inline bool has_target(void)
 }
 
 /* internal prototypes */
-static int __cpufreq_governor(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
-		unsigned int event);
+static int cpufreq_governor(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int event);
 static unsigned int __cpufreq_get(struct cpufreq_policy *policy);
 
 /**
@@ -999,7 +998,7 @@ static int cpufreq_add_policy_cpu(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int cp
 
 	down_write(&policy->rwsem);
 	if (has_target()) {
-		ret = __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_STOP);
+		ret = cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_STOP);
 		if (ret) {
 			pr_err("%s: Failed to stop governor\n", __func__);
 			goto unlock;
@@ -1009,9 +1008,9 @@ static int cpufreq_add_policy_cpu(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int cp
 	cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, policy->cpus);
 
 	if (has_target()) {
-		ret = __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_START);
+		ret = cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_START);
 		if (!ret)
-			ret = __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS);
+			ret = cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS);
 
 		if (ret)
 			pr_err("%s: Failed to start governor\n", __func__);
@@ -1333,7 +1332,7 @@ static void cpufreq_offline(unsigned int cpu)
 
 	down_write(&policy->rwsem);
 	if (has_target()) {
-		ret = __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_STOP);
+		ret = cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_STOP);
 		if (ret)
 			pr_err("%s: Failed to stop governor\n", __func__);
 	}
@@ -1354,9 +1353,9 @@ static void cpufreq_offline(unsigned int cpu)
 	/* Start governor again for active policy */
 	if (!policy_is_inactive(policy)) {
 		if (has_target()) {
-			ret = __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_START);
+			ret = cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_START);
 			if (!ret)
-				ret = __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS);
+				ret = cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS);
 
 			if (ret)
 				pr_err("%s: Failed to start governor\n", __func__);
@@ -1370,7 +1369,7 @@ static void cpufreq_offline(unsigned int cpu)
 
 	/* If cpu is last user of policy, free policy */
 	if (has_target()) {
-		ret = __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_EXIT);
+		ret = cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_EXIT);
 		if (ret)
 			pr_err("%s: Failed to exit governor\n", __func__);
 	}
@@ -1586,7 +1585,7 @@ void cpufreq_suspend(void)
 
 	for_each_active_policy(policy) {
 		down_write(&policy->rwsem);
-		ret = __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_STOP);
+		ret = cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_STOP);
 		up_write(&policy->rwsem);
 
 		if (ret)
@@ -1629,9 +1628,9 @@ void cpufreq_resume(void)
 				policy);
 		} else {
 			down_write(&policy->rwsem);
-			ret = __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_START);
+			ret = cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_START);
 			if (!ret)
-				__cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS);
+				cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS);
 			up_write(&policy->rwsem);
 
 			if (ret)
@@ -1928,8 +1927,7 @@ __weak struct cpufreq_governor *cpufreq_fallback_governor(void)
 	return NULL;
 }
 
-static int __cpufreq_governor(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
-					unsigned int event)
+static int cpufreq_governor(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int event)
 {
 	int ret;
 
@@ -2141,7 +2139,7 @@ static int cpufreq_set_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
 	old_gov = policy->governor;
 	/* end old governor */
 	if (old_gov) {
-		ret = __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_STOP);
+		ret = cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_STOP);
 		if (ret) {
 			/* This can happen due to race with other operations */
 			pr_debug("%s: Failed to Stop Governor: %s (%d)\n",
@@ -2149,7 +2147,7 @@ static int cpufreq_set_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
 			return ret;
 		}
 
-		ret = __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_EXIT);
+		ret = cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_EXIT);
 		if (ret) {
 			pr_err("%s: Failed to Exit Governor: %s (%d)\n",
 			       __func__, old_gov->name, ret);
@@ -2159,30 +2157,30 @@ static int cpufreq_set_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
 
 	/* start new governor */
 	policy->governor = new_policy->governor;
-	ret = __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_INIT);
+	ret = cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_INIT);
 	if (!ret) {
-		ret = __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_START);
+		ret = cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_START);
 		if (!ret)
 			goto out;
 
-		__cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_EXIT);
+		cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_EXIT);
 	}
 
 	/* new governor failed, so re-start old one */
 	pr_debug("starting governor %s failed\n", policy->governor->name);
 	if (old_gov) {
 		policy->governor = old_gov;
-		if (__cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_INIT))
+		if (cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_INIT))
 			policy->governor = NULL;
 		else
-			__cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_START);
+			cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_START);
 	}
 
 	return ret;
 
  out:
 	pr_debug("governor: change or update limits\n");
-	return __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS);
+	return cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS);
 }
 
 /**
@@ -2285,7 +2283,7 @@ static int cpufreq_boost_set_sw(int state)
 
 			down_write(&policy->rwsem);
 			policy->user_policy.max = policy->max;
-			__cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS);
+			cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS);
 			up_write(&policy->rwsem);
 		}
 	}
-- 
2.7.1.410.g6faf27b

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/3] cpufreq: Remove 'policy->governor_enabled'
  2016-02-22 11:06 [PATCH 0/3] cpufreq: Minor cleanups Viresh Kumar
  2016-02-22 11:06 ` [PATCH 1/3] cpufreq: Relocate handle_update() to kill its declaration Viresh Kumar
  2016-02-22 11:06 ` [PATCH 2/3] cpufreq: Rename __cpufreq_governor() to cpufreq_governor() Viresh Kumar
@ 2016-02-22 11:06 ` Viresh Kumar
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2016-02-22 11:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rafael Wysocki, Viresh Kumar; +Cc: linaro-kernel, linux-pm, linux-kernel

The entire sequence of events (like INIT/START or STOP/EXIT) for which
cpufreq_governor() is called, is guaranteed to be protected by
policy->rwsem now.

The additional checks that were added earlier (as we were forced to drop
policy->rwsem before calling cpufreq_governor() for EXIT event), aren't
required anymore.

Over that, they weren't sufficient really. They just take care of
START/STOP events, but not INIT/EXIT and the state machine was never
maintained properly by them.

Kill the unnecessary checks and policy->governor_enabled field.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 17 -----------------
 include/linux/cpufreq.h   |  1 -
 2 files changed, 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index fa070bf87dd8..8259e8215bc1 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -1961,17 +1961,6 @@ static int cpufreq_governor(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int event)
 
 	pr_debug("%s: for CPU %u, event %u\n", __func__, policy->cpu, event);
 
-	if ((policy->governor_enabled && event == CPUFREQ_GOV_START)
-	    || (!policy->governor_enabled
-	    && (event == CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS || event == CPUFREQ_GOV_STOP))) {
-		return -EBUSY;
-	}
-
-	if (event == CPUFREQ_GOV_STOP)
-		policy->governor_enabled = false;
-	else if (event == CPUFREQ_GOV_START)
-		policy->governor_enabled = true;
-
 	ret = policy->governor->governor(policy, event);
 
 	if (!ret) {
@@ -1979,12 +1968,6 @@ static int cpufreq_governor(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int event)
 			policy->governor->initialized++;
 		else if (event == CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_EXIT)
 			policy->governor->initialized--;
-	} else {
-		/* Restore original values */
-		if (event == CPUFREQ_GOV_STOP)
-			policy->governor_enabled = true;
-		else if (event == CPUFREQ_GOV_START)
-			policy->governor_enabled = false;
 	}
 
 	if (((event == CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_INIT) && ret) ||
diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
index cac3d1ba8200..a50c5b2e3bf2 100644
--- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h
+++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
@@ -80,7 +80,6 @@ struct cpufreq_policy {
 	unsigned int		last_policy; /* policy before unplug */
 	struct cpufreq_governor	*governor; /* see below */
 	void			*governor_data;
-	bool			governor_enabled; /* governor start/stop flag */
 	char			last_governor[CPUFREQ_NAME_LEN]; /* last governor used */
 
 	struct work_struct	update; /* if update_policy() needs to be
-- 
2.7.1.410.g6faf27b

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 0/3] cpufreq: Minor cleanups
@ 2022-05-26 11:51 Viresh Kumar
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2022-05-26 11:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rafael J. Wysocki, Viresh Kumar; +Cc: linux-pm, Vincent Guittot, linux-kernel

Hi Rafael,

This series contains few cleanups, with no dependency between the patches.

--
Viresh

Viresh Kumar (3):
  cpufreq: Optimize cpufreq_show_cpus()
  cpufreq: Panic if policy is active in cpufreq_policy_free()
  cpufreq: Drop unnecessary cpus locking from store()

 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 33 +++++++++++++++------------------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

-- 
2.31.1.272.g89b43f80a514


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2022-05-26 11:51 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-02-22 11:06 [PATCH 0/3] cpufreq: Minor cleanups Viresh Kumar
2016-02-22 11:06 ` [PATCH 1/3] cpufreq: Relocate handle_update() to kill its declaration Viresh Kumar
2016-02-22 11:06 ` [PATCH 2/3] cpufreq: Rename __cpufreq_governor() to cpufreq_governor() Viresh Kumar
2016-02-22 11:06 ` [PATCH 3/3] cpufreq: Remove 'policy->governor_enabled' Viresh Kumar
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-05-26 11:51 [PATCH 0/3] cpufreq: Minor cleanups Viresh Kumar

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).