* [PATCH 0/3] cpufreq: Minor cleanups
@ 2016-02-22 11:06 Viresh Kumar
2016-02-22 11:06 ` [PATCH 1/3] cpufreq: Relocate handle_update() to kill its declaration Viresh Kumar
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2016-02-22 11:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael Wysocki; +Cc: linaro-kernel, linux-pm, Viresh Kumar
Hi Rafael,
Here are a bunch of cleanups for cpufreq-core.
Viresh Kumar (3):
cpufreq: Relocate handle_update() to kill its declaration
cpufreq: Rename __cpufreq_governor() to cpufreq_governor()
cpufreq: Remove 'policy->governor_enabled'
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 80 ++++++++++++++++++-----------------------------
include/linux/cpufreq.h | 1 -
2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)
--
2.7.1.410.g6faf27b
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/3] cpufreq: Relocate handle_update() to kill its declaration
2016-02-22 11:06 [PATCH 0/3] cpufreq: Minor cleanups Viresh Kumar
@ 2016-02-22 11:06 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-02-22 11:06 ` [PATCH 2/3] cpufreq: Rename __cpufreq_governor() to cpufreq_governor() Viresh Kumar
2016-02-22 11:06 ` [PATCH 3/3] cpufreq: Remove 'policy->governor_enabled' Viresh Kumar
2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2016-02-22 11:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael Wysocki, Viresh Kumar; +Cc: linaro-kernel, linux-pm, linux-kernel
handle_update() is declared at the top of the file as its user appear
before its definition. Relocate the routine to get rid of this.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 19 +++++++++----------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index 5ab9c5432113..3689b4dff967 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -121,7 +121,6 @@ static inline bool has_target(void)
static int __cpufreq_governor(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
unsigned int event);
static unsigned int __cpufreq_get(struct cpufreq_policy *policy);
-static void handle_update(struct work_struct *work);
/**
* Two notifier lists: the "policy" list is involved in the
@@ -1023,6 +1022,15 @@ static int cpufreq_add_policy_cpu(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int cp
return ret;
}
+static void handle_update(struct work_struct *work)
+{
+ struct cpufreq_policy *policy =
+ container_of(work, struct cpufreq_policy, update);
+ unsigned int cpu = policy->cpu;
+ pr_debug("handle_update for cpu %u called\n", cpu);
+ cpufreq_update_policy(cpu);
+}
+
static struct cpufreq_policy *cpufreq_policy_alloc(unsigned int cpu)
{
struct device *dev = get_cpu_device(cpu);
@@ -1404,15 +1412,6 @@ static void cpufreq_remove_dev(struct device *dev, struct subsys_interface *sif)
cpufreq_policy_free(policy, true);
}
-static void handle_update(struct work_struct *work)
-{
- struct cpufreq_policy *policy =
- container_of(work, struct cpufreq_policy, update);
- unsigned int cpu = policy->cpu;
- pr_debug("handle_update for cpu %u called\n", cpu);
- cpufreq_update_policy(cpu);
-}
-
/**
* cpufreq_out_of_sync - If actual and saved CPU frequency differs, we're
* in deep trouble.
--
2.7.1.410.g6faf27b
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/3] cpufreq: Rename __cpufreq_governor() to cpufreq_governor()
2016-02-22 11:06 [PATCH 0/3] cpufreq: Minor cleanups Viresh Kumar
2016-02-22 11:06 ` [PATCH 1/3] cpufreq: Relocate handle_update() to kill its declaration Viresh Kumar
@ 2016-02-22 11:06 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-02-22 11:06 ` [PATCH 3/3] cpufreq: Remove 'policy->governor_enabled' Viresh Kumar
2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2016-02-22 11:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael Wysocki, Viresh Kumar; +Cc: linaro-kernel, linux-pm, linux-kernel
The __ at the beginning of the routine aren't really necessary at all.
Rename it to cpufreq_governor() instead.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index 3689b4dff967..fa070bf87dd8 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -118,8 +118,7 @@ static inline bool has_target(void)
}
/* internal prototypes */
-static int __cpufreq_governor(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
- unsigned int event);
+static int cpufreq_governor(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int event);
static unsigned int __cpufreq_get(struct cpufreq_policy *policy);
/**
@@ -999,7 +998,7 @@ static int cpufreq_add_policy_cpu(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int cp
down_write(&policy->rwsem);
if (has_target()) {
- ret = __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_STOP);
+ ret = cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_STOP);
if (ret) {
pr_err("%s: Failed to stop governor\n", __func__);
goto unlock;
@@ -1009,9 +1008,9 @@ static int cpufreq_add_policy_cpu(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int cp
cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, policy->cpus);
if (has_target()) {
- ret = __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_START);
+ ret = cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_START);
if (!ret)
- ret = __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS);
+ ret = cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS);
if (ret)
pr_err("%s: Failed to start governor\n", __func__);
@@ -1333,7 +1332,7 @@ static void cpufreq_offline(unsigned int cpu)
down_write(&policy->rwsem);
if (has_target()) {
- ret = __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_STOP);
+ ret = cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_STOP);
if (ret)
pr_err("%s: Failed to stop governor\n", __func__);
}
@@ -1354,9 +1353,9 @@ static void cpufreq_offline(unsigned int cpu)
/* Start governor again for active policy */
if (!policy_is_inactive(policy)) {
if (has_target()) {
- ret = __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_START);
+ ret = cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_START);
if (!ret)
- ret = __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS);
+ ret = cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS);
if (ret)
pr_err("%s: Failed to start governor\n", __func__);
@@ -1370,7 +1369,7 @@ static void cpufreq_offline(unsigned int cpu)
/* If cpu is last user of policy, free policy */
if (has_target()) {
- ret = __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_EXIT);
+ ret = cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_EXIT);
if (ret)
pr_err("%s: Failed to exit governor\n", __func__);
}
@@ -1586,7 +1585,7 @@ void cpufreq_suspend(void)
for_each_active_policy(policy) {
down_write(&policy->rwsem);
- ret = __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_STOP);
+ ret = cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_STOP);
up_write(&policy->rwsem);
if (ret)
@@ -1629,9 +1628,9 @@ void cpufreq_resume(void)
policy);
} else {
down_write(&policy->rwsem);
- ret = __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_START);
+ ret = cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_START);
if (!ret)
- __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS);
+ cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS);
up_write(&policy->rwsem);
if (ret)
@@ -1928,8 +1927,7 @@ __weak struct cpufreq_governor *cpufreq_fallback_governor(void)
return NULL;
}
-static int __cpufreq_governor(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
- unsigned int event)
+static int cpufreq_governor(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int event)
{
int ret;
@@ -2141,7 +2139,7 @@ static int cpufreq_set_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
old_gov = policy->governor;
/* end old governor */
if (old_gov) {
- ret = __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_STOP);
+ ret = cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_STOP);
if (ret) {
/* This can happen due to race with other operations */
pr_debug("%s: Failed to Stop Governor: %s (%d)\n",
@@ -2149,7 +2147,7 @@ static int cpufreq_set_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
return ret;
}
- ret = __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_EXIT);
+ ret = cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_EXIT);
if (ret) {
pr_err("%s: Failed to Exit Governor: %s (%d)\n",
__func__, old_gov->name, ret);
@@ -2159,30 +2157,30 @@ static int cpufreq_set_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
/* start new governor */
policy->governor = new_policy->governor;
- ret = __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_INIT);
+ ret = cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_INIT);
if (!ret) {
- ret = __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_START);
+ ret = cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_START);
if (!ret)
goto out;
- __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_EXIT);
+ cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_EXIT);
}
/* new governor failed, so re-start old one */
pr_debug("starting governor %s failed\n", policy->governor->name);
if (old_gov) {
policy->governor = old_gov;
- if (__cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_INIT))
+ if (cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_INIT))
policy->governor = NULL;
else
- __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_START);
+ cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_START);
}
return ret;
out:
pr_debug("governor: change or update limits\n");
- return __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS);
+ return cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS);
}
/**
@@ -2285,7 +2283,7 @@ static int cpufreq_boost_set_sw(int state)
down_write(&policy->rwsem);
policy->user_policy.max = policy->max;
- __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS);
+ cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS);
up_write(&policy->rwsem);
}
}
--
2.7.1.410.g6faf27b
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 3/3] cpufreq: Remove 'policy->governor_enabled'
2016-02-22 11:06 [PATCH 0/3] cpufreq: Minor cleanups Viresh Kumar
2016-02-22 11:06 ` [PATCH 1/3] cpufreq: Relocate handle_update() to kill its declaration Viresh Kumar
2016-02-22 11:06 ` [PATCH 2/3] cpufreq: Rename __cpufreq_governor() to cpufreq_governor() Viresh Kumar
@ 2016-02-22 11:06 ` Viresh Kumar
2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2016-02-22 11:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael Wysocki, Viresh Kumar; +Cc: linaro-kernel, linux-pm, linux-kernel
The entire sequence of events (like INIT/START or STOP/EXIT) for which
cpufreq_governor() is called, is guaranteed to be protected by
policy->rwsem now.
The additional checks that were added earlier (as we were forced to drop
policy->rwsem before calling cpufreq_governor() for EXIT event), aren't
required anymore.
Over that, they weren't sufficient really. They just take care of
START/STOP events, but not INIT/EXIT and the state machine was never
maintained properly by them.
Kill the unnecessary checks and policy->governor_enabled field.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 17 -----------------
include/linux/cpufreq.h | 1 -
2 files changed, 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index fa070bf87dd8..8259e8215bc1 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -1961,17 +1961,6 @@ static int cpufreq_governor(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int event)
pr_debug("%s: for CPU %u, event %u\n", __func__, policy->cpu, event);
- if ((policy->governor_enabled && event == CPUFREQ_GOV_START)
- || (!policy->governor_enabled
- && (event == CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS || event == CPUFREQ_GOV_STOP))) {
- return -EBUSY;
- }
-
- if (event == CPUFREQ_GOV_STOP)
- policy->governor_enabled = false;
- else if (event == CPUFREQ_GOV_START)
- policy->governor_enabled = true;
-
ret = policy->governor->governor(policy, event);
if (!ret) {
@@ -1979,12 +1968,6 @@ static int cpufreq_governor(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int event)
policy->governor->initialized++;
else if (event == CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_EXIT)
policy->governor->initialized--;
- } else {
- /* Restore original values */
- if (event == CPUFREQ_GOV_STOP)
- policy->governor_enabled = true;
- else if (event == CPUFREQ_GOV_START)
- policy->governor_enabled = false;
}
if (((event == CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_INIT) && ret) ||
diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
index cac3d1ba8200..a50c5b2e3bf2 100644
--- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h
+++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
@@ -80,7 +80,6 @@ struct cpufreq_policy {
unsigned int last_policy; /* policy before unplug */
struct cpufreq_governor *governor; /* see below */
void *governor_data;
- bool governor_enabled; /* governor start/stop flag */
char last_governor[CPUFREQ_NAME_LEN]; /* last governor used */
struct work_struct update; /* if update_policy() needs to be
--
2.7.1.410.g6faf27b
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 0/3] cpufreq: Minor cleanups
@ 2022-05-26 11:51 Viresh Kumar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2022-05-26 11:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki, Viresh Kumar; +Cc: linux-pm, Vincent Guittot, linux-kernel
Hi Rafael,
This series contains few cleanups, with no dependency between the patches.
--
Viresh
Viresh Kumar (3):
cpufreq: Optimize cpufreq_show_cpus()
cpufreq: Panic if policy is active in cpufreq_policy_free()
cpufreq: Drop unnecessary cpus locking from store()
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 33 +++++++++++++++------------------
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
--
2.31.1.272.g89b43f80a514
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-05-26 11:51 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-02-22 11:06 [PATCH 0/3] cpufreq: Minor cleanups Viresh Kumar
2016-02-22 11:06 ` [PATCH 1/3] cpufreq: Relocate handle_update() to kill its declaration Viresh Kumar
2016-02-22 11:06 ` [PATCH 2/3] cpufreq: Rename __cpufreq_governor() to cpufreq_governor() Viresh Kumar
2016-02-22 11:06 ` [PATCH 3/3] cpufreq: Remove 'policy->governor_enabled' Viresh Kumar
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-05-26 11:51 [PATCH 0/3] cpufreq: Minor cleanups Viresh Kumar
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).