From: "Gautham R. Shenoy" <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Michael Neuling <michael.neuling@au1.ibm.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Gautham R. Shenoy" <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC/PATCH 0/2] powernv:cpuidle: Enable winkle idle state
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2016 03:56:53 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cover.1471557381.git.ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
From: "Gautham R. Shenoy" <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Hi,
The patches in these series enable support for Winkle idle state in
CPU-Idle.
The first patch is a platform-independent CPU-Idle patch that allows
CPU-Idle states to be disabled at start (Currently they are all
enabled by default).
The second patch adds the winkle enablement for powernv-cpuidle. By
default, the winkle idle-state is disabled. It can be enabled by
writing zero to the per-cpu cpuidle sysfs control file named
"disable".
This series has been lightly tested on a 2-socket POWER8 system and
the machine was pretty stable while running kernbench and ebizzy. I
didn't see any regressions with those.
I haven't yet evaluated the impact that these patches might have
on latency sensitive workloads. I hope to do that in a day or two.
On the power-savings front, I could observe 6-8% additional
power-savings when winkle state was enabled on an idle system with
SMT=on. With SMT=off, additional idle power-savings observed with
winkle enabled were greater than 15%. The numbers indicate that it
might be worth the while to pursue this!
Gautham R. Shenoy (2):
cpuidle: Allow idle-states to be disabled at start
powernv:cpuidle: Enable winkle idle state in CPU-Idle.
drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-powernv.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c | 7 +++++++
include/linux/cpuidle.h | 7 ++++++-
3 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
--
1.9.4
next reply other threads:[~2016-08-18 22:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-18 22:26 Gautham R. Shenoy [this message]
2016-08-18 22:26 ` [RFC/PATCH 1/2] cpuidle: Allow idle-states to be disabled at start Gautham R. Shenoy
2016-08-24 14:44 ` Daniel Lezcano
2016-08-24 14:48 ` Balbir Singh
2016-08-24 15:06 ` Daniel Lezcano
2016-08-25 13:46 ` Balbir Singh
2016-08-25 14:07 ` Daniel Lezcano
2016-08-18 22:26 ` [RFC/PATCH 2/2] powernv:cpuidle: Enable winkle idle state in CPU-Idle Gautham R. Shenoy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cover.1471557381.git.ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=anton@samba.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=michael.neuling@au1.ibm.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).