From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: Rafael Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Javi Merino <javi.merino@kernel.org>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
Cc: linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@gmail.com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Subject: [PATCH 00/17] thermal: cpu_cooling: improve interaction with cpufreq core
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 10:56:58 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cover.1489639999.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> (raw)
Hi Guys,
The cpu_cooling driver is designed to use CPU frequency scaling to avoid
high thermal states for a platform. But it wasn't glued really well with
cpufreq core.
This series tries to improve interactions between cpufreq core and
cpu_cooling driver and does some fixes/cleanups to the cpu_cooling
driver.
I am a bit confused about which tree this series should go through, PM
or thermal.
This series has dependency on few other patches which are already merged
in the PM [1] tree and thermal [2] tree. As this is 4.12 material, all
of this should go through only one tree to avoid conflicts.
I assume that one of Rafael and Rui have to drop the existing patch(es)
from their trees and let the other one apply all of these. I would let
you guys decide on that. Sorry for the trouble.
I have tested it on ARM 32 (exynos) and 64 bit (hikey) boards and have
pushed them for 0-day build bot and kernel CI testing as well. We should
know if something is broken with these.
@Javi: It would be good if you can give them a test, specially because
of your work on the "power" specific bits in the driver.
Pushed here as well:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vireshk/pm.git thermal/cooling
--
viresh
[1] https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=148946890403271&w=2
[2] https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=148644060126593&w=2
Viresh Kumar (17):
thermal: cpu_cooling: Avoid accessing potentially freed structures
thermal: cpu_cooling: rearrange globals
thermal: cpu_cooling: Replace cpufreq_device with cpufreq_dev
thermal: cpu_cooling: replace cool_dev with cdev
thermal: cpu_cooling: remove cpufreq_cooling_get_level()
thermal: cpu_cooling: get rid of a variable in cpufreq_set_cur_state()
thermal: cpu_cooling: use cpufreq_policy to register cooling device
cpufreq: create cpufreq_table_count_valid_entries()
thermal: cpu_cooling: store cpufreq policy
thermal: cpu_cooling: OPPs are registered for all CPUs
thermal: cpu_cooling: get rid of 'allowed_cpus'
thermal: cpu_cooling: merge frequency and power tables
thermal: cpu_cooling: create structure for idle time stats
thermal: cpu_cooling: get_level() can't fail
thermal: cpu_cooling: don't store cpu_dev in cpufreq_dev
thermal: cpu_cooling: 'freq' can't be zero in cpufreq_state2power()
thermal: cpu_cooling: Rearrange struct cpufreq_cooling_device
drivers/cpufreq/arm_big_little.c | 2 +-
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c | 2 +-
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_stats.c | 13 +-
drivers/cpufreq/dbx500-cpufreq.c | 2 +-
drivers/cpufreq/mt8173-cpufreq.c | 4 +-
drivers/cpufreq/qoriq-cpufreq.c | 3 +-
drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c | 530 ++++++++-------------
drivers/thermal/imx_thermal.c | 22 +-
drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-thermal-common.c | 22 +-
include/linux/cpu_cooling.h | 32 +-
include/linux/cpufreq.h | 14 +
11 files changed, 272 insertions(+), 374 deletions(-)
--
2.7.1.410.g6faf27b
next reply other threads:[~2017-03-16 5:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-16 5:26 Viresh Kumar [this message]
2017-03-16 5:29 ` [PATCH 01/17] thermal: cpu_cooling: Avoid accessing potentially freed structures Viresh Kumar
2017-03-16 5:29 ` [PATCH 02/17] thermal: cpu_cooling: rearrange globals Viresh Kumar
2017-03-16 5:29 ` [PATCH 03/17] thermal: cpu_cooling: Replace cpufreq_device with cpufreq_dev Viresh Kumar
2017-04-11 17:33 ` Eduardo Valentin
2017-04-12 6:16 ` Viresh Kumar
2017-03-16 5:29 ` [PATCH 04/17] thermal: cpu_cooling: replace cool_dev with cdev Viresh Kumar
2017-04-11 17:35 ` Eduardo Valentin
2017-03-16 5:29 ` [PATCH 05/17] thermal: cpu_cooling: remove cpufreq_cooling_get_level() Viresh Kumar
2017-04-11 17:43 ` Eduardo Valentin
2017-04-12 6:25 ` Viresh Kumar
2017-03-16 5:29 ` [PATCH 06/17] thermal: cpu_cooling: get rid of a variable in cpufreq_set_cur_state() Viresh Kumar
2017-03-16 5:29 ` [PATCH 07/17] thermal: cpu_cooling: use cpufreq_policy to register cooling device Viresh Kumar
2017-03-16 5:29 ` [PATCH 08/17] cpufreq: create cpufreq_table_count_valid_entries() Viresh Kumar
2017-03-16 5:29 ` [PATCH 09/17] thermal: cpu_cooling: store cpufreq policy Viresh Kumar
2017-03-16 5:29 ` [PATCH 10/17] thermal: cpu_cooling: OPPs are registered for all CPUs Viresh Kumar
2017-03-16 5:29 ` [PATCH 11/17] thermal: cpu_cooling: get rid of 'allowed_cpus' Viresh Kumar
2017-03-16 5:29 ` [PATCH 12/17] thermal: cpu_cooling: merge frequency and power tables Viresh Kumar
2017-03-16 5:29 ` [PATCH 13/17] thermal: cpu_cooling: create structure for idle time stats Viresh Kumar
2017-03-16 5:29 ` [PATCH 14/17] thermal: cpu_cooling: get_level() can't fail Viresh Kumar
2017-03-16 5:29 ` [PATCH 15/17] thermal: cpu_cooling: don't store cpu_dev in cpufreq_dev Viresh Kumar
2017-03-16 5:29 ` [PATCH 16/17] thermal: cpu_cooling: 'freq' can't be zero in cpufreq_state2power() Viresh Kumar
2017-03-16 5:29 ` [PATCH 17/17] thermal: cpu_cooling: Rearrange struct cpufreq_cooling_device Viresh Kumar
2017-04-11 6:02 ` [PATCH 00/17] thermal: cpu_cooling: improve interaction with cpufreq core Viresh Kumar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cover.1489639999.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=amit.kachhap@gmail.com \
--cc=edubezval@gmail.com \
--cc=javi.merino@kernel.org \
--cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).