linux-pm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: Rafael Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Javi Merino <javi.merino@kernel.org>,
	Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
	Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
Cc: linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@gmail.com>,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Subject: [PATCH 00/17] thermal: cpu_cooling: improve interaction with cpufreq core
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 10:56:58 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cover.1489639999.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> (raw)

Hi Guys,

The cpu_cooling driver is designed to use CPU frequency scaling to avoid
high thermal states for a platform. But it wasn't glued really well with
cpufreq core.

This series tries to improve interactions between cpufreq core and
cpu_cooling driver and does some fixes/cleanups to the cpu_cooling
driver.

I am a bit confused about which tree this series should go through, PM
or thermal.

This series has dependency on few other patches which are already merged
in the PM [1] tree and thermal [2] tree. As this is 4.12 material, all
of this should go through only one tree to avoid conflicts.

I assume that one of Rafael and Rui have to drop the existing patch(es)
from their trees and let the other one apply all of these. I would let
you guys decide on that. Sorry for the trouble.

I have tested it on ARM 32 (exynos) and 64 bit (hikey) boards and have
pushed them for 0-day build bot and kernel CI testing as well. We should
know if something is broken with these.

@Javi: It would be good if you can give them a test, specially because
of your work on the "power" specific bits in the driver.

Pushed here as well:

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vireshk/pm.git thermal/cooling

--
viresh

[1] https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=148946890403271&w=2
[2] https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=148644060126593&w=2

Viresh Kumar (17):
  thermal: cpu_cooling: Avoid accessing potentially freed structures
  thermal: cpu_cooling: rearrange globals
  thermal: cpu_cooling: Replace cpufreq_device with cpufreq_dev
  thermal: cpu_cooling: replace cool_dev with cdev
  thermal: cpu_cooling: remove cpufreq_cooling_get_level()
  thermal: cpu_cooling: get rid of a variable in cpufreq_set_cur_state()
  thermal: cpu_cooling: use cpufreq_policy to register cooling device
  cpufreq: create cpufreq_table_count_valid_entries()
  thermal: cpu_cooling: store cpufreq policy
  thermal: cpu_cooling: OPPs are registered for all CPUs
  thermal: cpu_cooling: get rid of 'allowed_cpus'
  thermal: cpu_cooling: merge frequency and power tables
  thermal: cpu_cooling: create structure for idle time stats
  thermal: cpu_cooling: get_level() can't fail
  thermal: cpu_cooling: don't store cpu_dev in cpufreq_dev
  thermal: cpu_cooling: 'freq' can't be zero in cpufreq_state2power()
  thermal: cpu_cooling: Rearrange struct cpufreq_cooling_device

 drivers/cpufreq/arm_big_little.c                   |   2 +-
 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c                       |   2 +-
 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_stats.c                    |  13 +-
 drivers/cpufreq/dbx500-cpufreq.c                   |   2 +-
 drivers/cpufreq/mt8173-cpufreq.c                   |   4 +-
 drivers/cpufreq/qoriq-cpufreq.c                    |   3 +-
 drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c                      | 530 ++++++++-------------
 drivers/thermal/imx_thermal.c                      |  22 +-
 drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-thermal-common.c |  22 +-
 include/linux/cpu_cooling.h                        |  32 +-
 include/linux/cpufreq.h                            |  14 +
 11 files changed, 272 insertions(+), 374 deletions(-)

-- 
2.7.1.410.g6faf27b

             reply	other threads:[~2017-03-16  5:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-16  5:26 Viresh Kumar [this message]
2017-03-16  5:29 ` [PATCH 01/17] thermal: cpu_cooling: Avoid accessing potentially freed structures Viresh Kumar
2017-03-16  5:29 ` [PATCH 02/17] thermal: cpu_cooling: rearrange globals Viresh Kumar
2017-03-16  5:29 ` [PATCH 03/17] thermal: cpu_cooling: Replace cpufreq_device with cpufreq_dev Viresh Kumar
2017-04-11 17:33   ` Eduardo Valentin
2017-04-12  6:16     ` Viresh Kumar
2017-03-16  5:29 ` [PATCH 04/17] thermal: cpu_cooling: replace cool_dev with cdev Viresh Kumar
2017-04-11 17:35   ` Eduardo Valentin
2017-03-16  5:29 ` [PATCH 05/17] thermal: cpu_cooling: remove cpufreq_cooling_get_level() Viresh Kumar
2017-04-11 17:43   ` Eduardo Valentin
2017-04-12  6:25     ` Viresh Kumar
2017-03-16  5:29 ` [PATCH 06/17] thermal: cpu_cooling: get rid of a variable in cpufreq_set_cur_state() Viresh Kumar
2017-03-16  5:29 ` [PATCH 07/17] thermal: cpu_cooling: use cpufreq_policy to register cooling device Viresh Kumar
2017-03-16  5:29 ` [PATCH 08/17] cpufreq: create cpufreq_table_count_valid_entries() Viresh Kumar
2017-03-16  5:29 ` [PATCH 09/17] thermal: cpu_cooling: store cpufreq policy Viresh Kumar
2017-03-16  5:29 ` [PATCH 10/17] thermal: cpu_cooling: OPPs are registered for all CPUs Viresh Kumar
2017-03-16  5:29 ` [PATCH 11/17] thermal: cpu_cooling: get rid of 'allowed_cpus' Viresh Kumar
2017-03-16  5:29 ` [PATCH 12/17] thermal: cpu_cooling: merge frequency and power tables Viresh Kumar
2017-03-16  5:29 ` [PATCH 13/17] thermal: cpu_cooling: create structure for idle time stats Viresh Kumar
2017-03-16  5:29 ` [PATCH 14/17] thermal: cpu_cooling: get_level() can't fail Viresh Kumar
2017-03-16  5:29 ` [PATCH 15/17] thermal: cpu_cooling: don't store cpu_dev in cpufreq_dev Viresh Kumar
2017-03-16  5:29 ` [PATCH 16/17] thermal: cpu_cooling: 'freq' can't be zero in cpufreq_state2power() Viresh Kumar
2017-03-16  5:29 ` [PATCH 17/17] thermal: cpu_cooling: Rearrange struct cpufreq_cooling_device Viresh Kumar
2017-04-11  6:02 ` [PATCH 00/17] thermal: cpu_cooling: improve interaction with cpufreq core Viresh Kumar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=cover.1489639999.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    --to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    --cc=amit.kachhap@gmail.com \
    --cc=edubezval@gmail.com \
    --cc=javi.merino@kernel.org \
    --cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).