From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Linux-pm mailing list
<linux-pm-qjLDD68F18O7TbgM5vRIOg@public.gmane.org>,
Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org>,
Stefan Seyfried <seife-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>,
kernel list
<linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
Andy Isaacson <adi-3HqRAUrWAWyGglJvpFV4uA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: swsusp 'disk' fails in bk-current - intel_agp at fault?
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 16:07:01 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d120d500050329130714e1daaf@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050329205225.GF8125-I/5MKhXcvmPrBKCeMvbIDA@public.gmane.org>
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 22:52:25 +0200, Pavel Machek <pavel-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> I don't really want us to try execve during resume... Could we simply
> artifically fail that execve with something if (in_suspend()) return
> -EINVAL; [except that in_suspend() just is not there, but there were
> some proposals to add it].
>
> Or just avoid calling hotplug at all in resume case? And then do
> coldplug-like scan when userspace is ready...
>
I am leaning towards calling disable_usermodehelper (not writtent yet)
after swsusp completes snapshotting memory. We really don't care about
hotplug events in this case and this will allow keeping "normal"
resume in drivers as is. What do you think?
--
Dmitry
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-03-29 21:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <4242CE43.1020806@suse.de>
[not found] ` <20050324181059.GA18490@hexapodia.org>
[not found] ` <4243252D.6090206@suse.de>
[not found] ` <20050324235439.GA27902@hexapodia.org>
[not found] ` <4243D854.2010506@suse.de>
[not found] ` <d120d50005032908183b2f622e@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <20050329181831.GB8125@elf.ucw.cz>
[not found] ` <d120d50005032911114fd2ea32@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <20050329192339.GE8125@elf.ucw.cz>
[not found] ` <d120d50005032912051fee6e91@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <d120d50005032912051fee6e91-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2005-03-29 20:52 ` swsusp 'disk' fails in bk-current - intel_agp at fault? Pavel Machek
[not found] ` <20050329205225.GF8125-I/5MKhXcvmPrBKCeMvbIDA@public.gmane.org>
2005-03-29 21:07 ` Dmitry Torokhov [this message]
[not found] ` <d120d500050329130714e1daaf-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2005-03-29 21:12 ` Pavel Machek
[not found] ` <20050329211239.GG8125-I/5MKhXcvmPrBKCeMvbIDA@public.gmane.org>
2005-03-29 21:33 ` Dmitry Torokhov
[not found] ` <d120d50005032913331be39802-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2005-03-29 21:44 ` Pavel Machek
[not found] ` <20050329214408.GH8125-I/5MKhXcvmPrBKCeMvbIDA@public.gmane.org>
2005-03-29 22:31 ` Nigel Cunningham
[not found] ` <1112135477.29392.16.camel-r49W/1Cwd2ff0s6lnCXPX/uOuaPYTxhvJwvTLr3MMZM@public.gmane.org>
2005-03-29 22:35 ` Pavel Machek
[not found] ` <20050329223519.GI8125-I/5MKhXcvmPrBKCeMvbIDA@public.gmane.org>
2005-03-29 23:46 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-03-31 7:26 ` Dmitry Torokhov
[not found] ` <200503310226.03495.dtor_core-yWtbtysYrB+LZ21kGMrzwg@public.gmane.org>
2005-03-31 8:39 ` Pavel Machek
[not found] ` <20050331083909.GA1387-I/5MKhXcvmPrBKCeMvbIDA@public.gmane.org>
2005-03-31 15:02 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-03-31 16:02 ` Patrick Mochel
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.50.0503310801410.15519-100000-x8k/2hhmB0w5etPau2IXcQ@public.gmane.org>
2005-03-31 16:32 ` Dmitry Torokhov
[not found] ` <d120d50005033108321c8f4ae7-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2005-03-31 22:16 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-03-31 22:18 ` Pavel Machek
[not found] ` <20050331221814.GC1802-I/5MKhXcvmPrBKCeMvbIDA@public.gmane.org>
2005-03-31 22:28 ` Nigel Cunningham
[not found] ` <1112308137.18871.7.camel-r49W/1Cwd2ff0s6lnCXPX/uOuaPYTxhvJwvTLr3MMZM@public.gmane.org>
2005-04-01 8:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
[not found] ` <200504011049.01540.rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org>
2005-04-01 10:33 ` Stefan Seyfried
2005-03-29 23:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-03-29 21:23 ` Patrick Mochel
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.50.0503291321490.29474-100000-x8k/2hhmB0w5etPau2IXcQ@public.gmane.org>
2005-03-29 21:38 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-03-30 9:52 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d120d500050329130714e1daaf@mail.gmail.com \
--to=dmitry.torokhov-re5jqeeqqe8avxtiumwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=adi-3HqRAUrWAWyGglJvpFV4uA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=dtor_core-yWtbtysYrB+LZ21kGMrzwg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-pm-qjLDD68F18O7TbgM5vRIOg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=pavel-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=seife-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org \
--cc=vojtech-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox