From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arioch Subject: Re: potential pitfall? changing configuration while PC in hibernate Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 13:49:20 +0300 Message-ID: References: <20050321095229.GA28507@elf.ucw.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============16292292448107926==" In-Reply-To: <20050321095229.GA28507-I/5MKhXcvmPrBKCeMvbIDA@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces-qjLDD68F18O7TbgM5vRIOg@public.gmane.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces-qjLDD68F18O7TbgM5vRIOg@public.gmane.org To: linux-pm-qjLDD68F18O7TbgM5vRIOg@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org --===============16292292448107926== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Pavel Machek =D0=C9=DB=C5=D4: > Current position is "don't do this". :-( It seems to be quite normal behaviour on notebooks with USB, PCMCIA, etc I wish such scenarios be supported in the general design scheme, leaving = it without certain implementing code maybe :-) So that once someone will want to implement it, he will not need to=20 re-design --===============16292292448107926== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline --===============16292292448107926==--