From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: SF Markus Elfring Subject: Re: bq2415x_charger: Use common error handling code in bq2415x_timer_work() Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2017 14:04:19 +0100 Message-ID: References: <48b34d35-8c41-d25b-0cb7-6257b37c5a44@users.sourceforge.net> <20171109120842.GA28552@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.15.3]:53615 "EHLO mout.web.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752678AbdKINE0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Nov 2017 08:04:26 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20171109120842.GA28552@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> Content-Language: en-GB Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: Pavel Machek , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Pali_Roh=c3=a1r?= , Sebastian Reichel , LKML , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org > Better fix would be to display separate messages; user is probably > interested in what failed... Which information (or wording) would you find more appropriate at these places? Regards, Markus