From: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
To: Sumit Gupta <sumitg@nvidia.com>,
"zhenglifeng (A)" <zhenglifeng1@huawei.com>,
rafael@kernel.org, viresh.kumar@linaro.org, lenb@kernel.org,
pierre.gondois@arm.com, zhanjie9@hisilicon.com,
saket.dumbre@intel.com, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
acpica-devel@lists.linux.dev
Cc: treding@nvidia.com, jonathanh@nvidia.com, vsethi@nvidia.com,
ksitaraman@nvidia.com, sanjayc@nvidia.com, bbasu@nvidia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ACPI: CPPC: Add support for CPPC v4
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2026 10:33:13 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d76e7f9d-f418-457a-b08f-90f929bfe71b@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8badf464-a44b-4636-9202-6fcf00fc50eb@nvidia.com>
On 4/27/26 03:04, Sumit Gupta wrote:
>
> On 27/04/26 12:36, zhenglifeng (A) wrote:
>> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
>>
>>
>> It seems that mario has sent a similar patch:
>>
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260427035520.1427080-3-superm1@kernel.org/
>
>
> Thank you for sharing.
> Yes, both look similar with below two change.
> 1. REG_OPTIONAL needs the 0x1FC7D0 -> 0x7FC7D0 update to mark
> the two new registers optional. This is present in my [PATCH 1/2].
> 2. For Resource Priority, pkg_data added to cpc_entry.
> This is present in Mario's [PATCH 2/6].
>
>
> Hi Mario,
> How would you like to proceed? A few options:
> (a) Let both CPPCv4 patches from this series go separately.
> (b) Fold the REG_OPTIONAL update from my patch 1/2 into your
> patch, and pull my patch 2/2 into your series.
> (c) Anything else you'd prefer.
> Either way works for me.
>
> Thank you,
> Sumit Gupta
>
Reviewing yours points out that I totally missed updating REG_OPTIONAL
with the two new ACPI 6.7 fields being optional too.
In my series I only add in CPPv4 so I can build on top of the changes
for CPPCv5.
So - I would say we should let your patches merge for v4 and I'll drop
the relevant ones from my series and rebase mine on top of your work.
>
>>
>> On 4/27/2026 1:18 PM, Sumit Gupta wrote:
>>> CPPC v4 (ACPI 6.6, Section 8.4.6) adds two optional entries to the
>>> _CPC package:
>>>
>>> 1. OSPM Nominal Performance (8.4.6.1.2.6): A write-only register that
>>> lets OSPM inform the platform what it considers nominal performance.
>>> The platform classifies performance above this level as boost and
>>> below as throttle for its power/thermal decisions.
>>>
>>> 2. Resource Priority (8.4.6.1.2.7): A Package of Resource Priority
>>> Register Descriptor sub-packages that allow OSPM to set relative
>>> priority among processors for shared resources (boost, throttle,
>>> L2/L3 cache, memory bandwidth). Parsing the full structure is not
>>> yet supported; such entries are marked as unsupported.
>>>
>>> Add v4 _CPC table parsing (25 entries) and update REG_OPTIONAL to
>>> mark the two new registers as optional.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Sumit Gupta <sumitg@nvidia.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++------
>>> include/acpi/cppc_acpi.h | 8 ++++++--
>>> 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c b/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c
>>> index 2e91c5a97761..a1c91ce20cc8 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c
>>> @@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct cpc_desc *,
>>> cpc_desc_ptr);
>>> * cpc_regs[] with the corresponding index. 0 means mandatory and 1
>>> * means optional.
>>> */
>>> -#define REG_OPTIONAL (0x1FC7D0)
>>> +#define REG_OPTIONAL (0x7FC7D0)
>>>
>>> /*
>>> * Use the index of the register in per-cpu cpc_regs[] to check if
>>> @@ -751,18 +751,19 @@ int acpi_cppc_processor_probe(struct
>>> acpi_processor *pr)
>>> /*
>>> * Disregard _CPC if the number of entries in the return
>>> package is not
>>> * as expected, but support future revisions being proper
>>> supersets of
>>> - * the v3 and only causing more entries to be returned by _CPC.
>>> + * the v4 and only causing more entries to be returned by _CPC.
>>> */
>>> if ((cpc_rev == CPPC_V2_REV && num_ent != CPPC_V2_NUM_ENT) ||
>>> (cpc_rev == CPPC_V3_REV && num_ent != CPPC_V3_NUM_ENT) ||
>>> - (cpc_rev > CPPC_V3_REV && num_ent <= CPPC_V3_NUM_ENT)) {
>>> + (cpc_rev == CPPC_V4_REV && num_ent != CPPC_V4_NUM_ENT) ||
>>> + (cpc_rev > CPPC_V4_REV && num_ent <= CPPC_V4_NUM_ENT)) {
>>> pr_debug("Unexpected number of _CPC return package
>>> entries (%d) for CPU:%d\n",
>>> num_ent, pr->id);
>>> goto out_free;
>>> }
>>> - if (cpc_rev > CPPC_V3_REV) {
>>> - num_ent = CPPC_V3_NUM_ENT;
>>> - cpc_rev = CPPC_V3_REV;
>>> + if (cpc_rev > CPPC_V4_REV) {
>>> + num_ent = CPPC_V4_NUM_ENT;
>>> + cpc_rev = CPPC_V4_REV;
>>> }
>>>
>>> cpc_ptr->num_entries = num_ent;
>>> @@ -845,6 +846,17 @@ int acpi_cppc_processor_probe(struct
>>> acpi_processor *pr)
>>>
>>> cpc_ptr->cpc_regs[i-2].type = ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER;
>>> memcpy(&cpc_ptr->cpc_regs[i-2].cpc_entry.reg,
>>> gas_t, sizeof(*gas_t));
>>> + } else if (cpc_obj->type == ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE) {
>>> + /*
>>> + * ACPI 6.6, s8.4.6.1.2.7 defines Resource
>>> Priority
>>> + * as a Package of Resource Priority Register
>>> Descriptor
>>> + * sub-packages. Parsing the full structure is
>>> not yet
>>> + * supported; mark the register as unsupported
>>> for now.
>>> + */
>>> + pr_debug("CPU:%d entry %d: package type not
>>> supported\n",
>>> + pr->id, i);
>>> + cpc_ptr->cpc_regs[i-2].type = ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER;
>>> + cpc_ptr->cpc_regs[i-2].cpc_entry.int_value = 0;
>>> } else {
>>> pr_debug("Invalid entry type (%d) in _CPC for
>>> CPU:%d\n",
>>> i, pr->id);
>>> diff --git a/include/acpi/cppc_acpi.h b/include/acpi/cppc_acpi.h
>>> index d1f02ceec4f9..8693890a7275 100644
>>> --- a/include/acpi/cppc_acpi.h
>>> +++ b/include/acpi/cppc_acpi.h
>>> @@ -17,16 +17,18 @@
>>> #include <acpi/pcc.h>
>>> #include <acpi/processor.h>
>>>
>>> -/* CPPCv2 and CPPCv3 support */
>>> +/* CPPCv2, CPPCv3 and CPPCv4 support */
>>> #define CPPC_V2_REV 2
>>> #define CPPC_V3_REV 3
>>> +#define CPPC_V4_REV 4
>>> #define CPPC_V2_NUM_ENT 21
>>> #define CPPC_V3_NUM_ENT 23
>>> +#define CPPC_V4_NUM_ENT 25
>>>
>>> #define PCC_CMD_COMPLETE_MASK (1 << 0)
>>> #define PCC_ERROR_MASK (1 << 2)
>>>
>>> -#define MAX_CPC_REG_ENT 21
>>> +#define MAX_CPC_REG_ENT 23
>>>
>>> /* CPPC specific PCC commands. */
>>> #define CMD_READ 0
>>> @@ -109,6 +111,8 @@ enum cppc_regs {
>>> REFERENCE_PERF,
>>> LOWEST_FREQ,
>>> NOMINAL_FREQ,
>>> + OSPM_NOMINAL_PERF,
>>> + RESOURCE_PRIORITY,
>>> };
>>>
>>> /*
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-27 15:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-27 5:18 [PATCH 0/2] ACPI: CPPC: Add CPPC v4 support (ACPI 6.6) Sumit Gupta
2026-04-27 5:18 ` [PATCH 1/2] ACPI: CPPC: Add support for CPPC v4 Sumit Gupta
2026-04-27 7:06 ` zhenglifeng (A)
2026-04-27 8:04 ` Sumit Gupta
2026-04-27 15:33 ` Mario Limonciello [this message]
2026-04-28 12:53 ` Sumit Gupta
2026-04-27 15:37 ` Mario Limonciello
2026-04-27 5:18 ` [PATCH 2/2] ACPI: CPPC: Add ospm_nominal_perf support Sumit Gupta
2026-04-27 15:36 ` Mario Limonciello
2026-04-28 12:55 ` Sumit Gupta
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d76e7f9d-f418-457a-b08f-90f929bfe71b@amd.com \
--to=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=acpica-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=bbasu@nvidia.com \
--cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
--cc=ksitaraman@nvidia.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pierre.gondois@arm.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=saket.dumbre@intel.com \
--cc=sanjayc@nvidia.com \
--cc=sumitg@nvidia.com \
--cc=treding@nvidia.com \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=vsethi@nvidia.com \
--cc=zhanjie9@hisilicon.com \
--cc=zhenglifeng1@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox