From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Viresh Kumar Subject: [PATCH 5/6] thermal/cpu_cooling: rename max_freq as clipped_freq in notifier Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 12:40:34 +0530 Message-ID: References: Return-path: In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: References: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: edubezval@gmail.com Cc: linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, rui.zhang@intel.com, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, radivoje.jovanovic@linux.intel.com, punit.agrawal@arm.com, Viresh Kumar , open list List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org That's what it is for, lets name it properly. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar --- drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c b/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c index 61ee726ede34..9209c324a7fc 100644 --- a/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c +++ b/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c @@ -215,7 +215,7 @@ static int cpufreq_thermal_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long event, void *data) { struct cpufreq_policy *policy = data; - unsigned long max_freq; + unsigned long clipped_freq; struct cpufreq_cooling_device *cpufreq_dev; if (event != CPUFREQ_ADJUST) @@ -226,10 +226,10 @@ static int cpufreq_thermal_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, if (!cpumask_test_cpu(policy->cpu, &cpufreq_dev->allowed_cpus)) continue; - max_freq = cpufreq_dev->clipped_freq; + clipped_freq = cpufreq_dev->clipped_freq; - if (policy->max != max_freq) - cpufreq_verify_within_limits(policy, 0, max_freq); + if (policy->max != clipped_freq) + cpufreq_verify_within_limits(policy, 0, clipped_freq); break; } mutex_unlock(&cooling_cpufreq_lock); -- 2.4.0