From: srinivas pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Set cpuinfo_min_freq to a lower value with HWP enabled plus cleanups
Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2026 14:50:39 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dd33bb24d2e8f048f2a10ea9536c9643572110fb.camel@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6005456.DvuYhMxLoT@rafael.j.wysocki>
On Fri, 2026-06-19 at 19:31 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is in v2 because technically it is an update of
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/2381464.iZASKD2KPV@rafael.j.wysocki/
>
> but it contains new patches.
>
> This series updates the intel_pstate driver to set cpuinfo_min_freq
> to a lower
> value when HWP is enabled to support systems in which CPUs can
> actually run
> at performance levels below the current minimum level.
>
Is this intentional?
HWP_CAP: 0x10f163e
MSR 0xce(platform_info: 0x804043df8811b00
cpu0/cpufreq/cpuinfo_min_freq
100000
cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_min_freq
400000
Thanks,
Srinivas
> It also carries out some code cleanups, mostly related to HWP, either
> in
> preparation for the functional changes or top of them.
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-21 21:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-19 17:31 [PATCH v2 0/6] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Set cpuinfo_min_freq to a lower value with HWP enabled plus cleanups Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-06-19 17:32 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Fix setting minimum P-state at init time Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-06-19 17:35 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Introduce intel_pstate_update_freq_limits() Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-06-19 17:40 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Set initial scaling_min_freq value Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-06-19 17:42 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Consolidate frequency values computation Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-06-19 17:44 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Consolidate HWP P-states initialization Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-06-19 17:45 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Move two functions closer to callers Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-06-21 21:50 ` srinivas pandruvada [this message]
2026-06-21 23:34 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Set cpuinfo_min_freq to a lower value with HWP enabled plus cleanups Doug Smythies
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=dd33bb24d2e8f048f2a10ea9536c9643572110fb.camel@linux.intel.com \
--to=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox