From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: Rafael Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
sboyd@codeaurora.org, prarit@redhat.com, skannan@codeaurora.org,
Srivatsa Bhat <srivatsa@mit.edu>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Subject: [PATCH V4 04/14] cpufreq: Don't traverse all active policies to find policy for a cpu
Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 12:22:12 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ddcf561174e5b412e3c1ef68a4321e94f196cc6c.1431412012.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <91b416f7a706ae0cbb5f90168988326793e05001.1431065963.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
We reach here while adding policy for a CPU and enter into the 'if'
block only if a policy already exists for the CPU.
As cpufreq_cpu_data is set for all policy->related_cpus now, when the
policy is first added, we can use that to find the CPU's policy instead
of traversing the list of all active policies.
Acked-by: Saravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
V4->V5:
- Rebased on top of [V4 1/14]
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 15 ++++++---------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index eb0c3a802b14..e6a63d6ba6f1 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -1213,16 +1213,13 @@ static int cpufreq_add_dev(struct device *dev, struct subsys_interface *sif)
return 0;
/* Check if this CPU already has a policy to manage it */
- read_lock_irqsave(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
- for_each_active_policy(policy) {
- if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, policy->related_cpus)) {
- read_unlock_irqrestore(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
- ret = cpufreq_add_policy_cpu(policy, cpu, dev);
- up_read(&cpufreq_rwsem);
- return ret;
- }
+ policy = per_cpu(cpufreq_cpu_data, cpu);
+ if (policy && !policy_is_inactive(policy)) {
+ WARN_ON(!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, policy->related_cpus));
+ ret = cpufreq_add_policy_cpu(policy, cpu, dev);
+ up_read(&cpufreq_rwsem);
+ return ret;
}
- read_unlock_irqrestore(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
/*
* Restore the saved policy when doing light-weight init and fall back
--
2.4.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-12 6:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-08 6:23 [PATCH V3 00/14] cpufreq: Don't loose cpufreq history on CPU hotplug Viresh Kumar
2015-05-08 6:23 ` [PATCH V3 01/14] cpufreq: Create for_each_{in}active_policy() Viresh Kumar
2015-05-08 21:46 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-05-09 2:27 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-05-12 6:04 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-05-12 6:50 ` [PATCH V4 " Viresh Kumar
2015-05-08 6:23 ` [PATCH V3 02/14] cpufreq: Don't clear cpufreq_cpu_data and policy list for inactive policies Viresh Kumar
2015-05-08 6:23 ` [PATCH V3 03/14] cpufreq: Get rid of cpufreq_cpu_data_fallback Viresh Kumar
2015-05-08 6:23 ` [PATCH V3 04/14] cpufreq: Don't traverse all active policies to find policy for a cpu Viresh Kumar
2015-05-12 6:52 ` Viresh Kumar [this message]
2015-05-08 6:23 ` [PATCH V3 05/14] cpufreq: Manage governor usage history with 'policy->last_governor' Viresh Kumar
2015-05-12 6:52 ` [PATCH V4 " Viresh Kumar
2015-05-08 6:23 ` [PATCH V3 06/14] cpufreq: Mark policy->governor = NULL for inactive policies Viresh Kumar
2015-05-12 6:52 ` [PATCH V4 " Viresh Kumar
2015-05-08 6:23 ` [PATCH V3 07/14] cpufreq: Don't allow updating inactive-policies from sysfs Viresh Kumar
2015-05-16 1:10 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-05-16 2:01 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-05-08 6:23 ` [PATCH V3 08/14] cpufreq: Track cpu managing sysfs kobjects separately Viresh Kumar
2015-05-08 6:23 ` [PATCH V3 09/14] cpufreq: Stop migrating sysfs files on hotplug Viresh Kumar
2015-05-08 6:23 ` [PATCH V3 10/14] cpufreq: Remove cpufreq_update_policy() Viresh Kumar
2015-05-08 6:23 ` [PATCH V3 11/14] cpufreq: Initialize policy->kobj while allocating policy Viresh Kumar
2015-05-08 6:23 ` [PATCH V3 12/14] cpufreq: Call cpufreq_policy_put_kobj() from cpufreq_policy_free() Viresh Kumar
2015-05-08 6:23 ` [PATCH V3 13/14] cpufreq: Restart governor as soon as possible Viresh Kumar
2015-05-08 6:23 ` [PATCH V3 14/14] cpufreq: Add support for physical hoplug of CPUs Viresh Kumar
2015-05-16 1:18 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-05-16 2:13 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-05-18 0:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-05-18 2:11 ` Viresh Kumar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ddcf561174e5b412e3c1ef68a4321e94f196cc6c.1431412012.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=prarit@redhat.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=skannan@codeaurora.org \
--cc=srivatsa@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).