From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: Rafael Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Viresh Kumar <vireshk@kernel.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Cc: linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Subject: [PATCH 10/10] PM / OPP: Split out part of _add_opp_table() and _remove_opp_table()
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2016 14:46:02 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e46f477bcf5cfdb0a0d7642adb95bd15e89a974a.1481015522.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1481015522.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
In-Reply-To: <cover.1481015522.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Split out parts of _add_opp_table() and _remove_opp_table() into
separate routines. This will be useful going forward (while doing
further cleanups).
Should result in no functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
drivers/base/power/opp/core.c | 76 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/base/power/opp/core.c b/drivers/base/power/opp/core.c
index f4b935892f5b..9dd9d3287854 100644
--- a/drivers/base/power/opp/core.c
+++ b/drivers/base/power/opp/core.c
@@ -832,26 +832,12 @@ struct opp_device *_add_opp_dev(const struct device *dev,
return opp_dev;
}
-/**
- * _add_opp_table() - Find OPP table or allocate a new one
- * @dev: device for which we do this operation
- *
- * It tries to find an existing table first, if it couldn't find one, it
- * allocates a new OPP table and returns that.
- *
- * Return: valid opp_table pointer if success, else NULL.
- */
-struct opp_table *_add_opp_table(struct device *dev)
+static struct opp_table *_allocate_opp_table(struct device *dev)
{
struct opp_table *opp_table;
struct opp_device *opp_dev;
int ret;
- /* Check for existing table for 'dev' first */
- opp_table = _find_opp_table(dev);
- if (!IS_ERR(opp_table))
- return opp_table;
-
/*
* Allocate a new OPP table. In the infrequent case where a new
* device is needed to be added, we pay this penalty.
@@ -888,6 +874,27 @@ struct opp_table *_add_opp_table(struct device *dev)
}
/**
+ * _add_opp_table() - Find OPP table or allocate a new one
+ * @dev: device for which we do this operation
+ *
+ * It tries to find an existing table first, if it couldn't find one, it
+ * allocates a new OPP table and returns that.
+ *
+ * Return: valid opp_table pointer if success, else NULL.
+ */
+struct opp_table *_add_opp_table(struct device *dev)
+{
+ struct opp_table *opp_table;
+
+ /* Check for existing table for 'dev' first */
+ opp_table = _find_opp_table(dev);
+ if (!IS_ERR(opp_table))
+ return opp_table;
+
+ return _allocate_opp_table(dev);
+}
+
+/**
* _kfree_device_rcu() - Free opp_table RCU handler
* @head: RCU head
*/
@@ -899,6 +906,27 @@ static void _kfree_device_rcu(struct rcu_head *head)
kfree_rcu(opp_table, rcu_head);
}
+static void _free_opp_table(struct opp_table *opp_table)
+{
+ struct opp_device *opp_dev;
+
+ /* Release clk */
+ if (!IS_ERR(opp_table->clk))
+ clk_put(opp_table->clk);
+
+ opp_dev = list_first_entry(&opp_table->dev_list, struct opp_device,
+ node);
+
+ _remove_opp_dev(opp_dev, opp_table);
+
+ /* dev_list must be empty now */
+ WARN_ON(!list_empty(&opp_table->dev_list));
+
+ list_del_rcu(&opp_table->node);
+ call_srcu(&opp_table->srcu_head.srcu, &opp_table->rcu_head,
+ _kfree_device_rcu);
+}
+
/**
* _remove_opp_table() - Removes a OPP table
* @opp_table: OPP table to be removed.
@@ -907,8 +935,6 @@ static void _kfree_device_rcu(struct rcu_head *head)
*/
static void _remove_opp_table(struct opp_table *opp_table)
{
- struct opp_device *opp_dev;
-
if (!list_empty(&opp_table->opp_list))
return;
@@ -924,21 +950,7 @@ static void _remove_opp_table(struct opp_table *opp_table)
if (opp_table->set_opp)
return;
- /* Release clk */
- if (!IS_ERR(opp_table->clk))
- clk_put(opp_table->clk);
-
- opp_dev = list_first_entry(&opp_table->dev_list, struct opp_device,
- node);
-
- _remove_opp_dev(opp_dev, opp_table);
-
- /* dev_list must be empty now */
- WARN_ON(!list_empty(&opp_table->dev_list));
-
- list_del_rcu(&opp_table->node);
- call_srcu(&opp_table->srcu_head.srcu, &opp_table->rcu_head,
- _kfree_device_rcu);
+ _free_opp_table(opp_table);
}
void _opp_free(struct dev_pm_opp *opp)
--
2.7.1.410.g6faf27b
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-12-06 9:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-12-06 9:15 [PATCH 00/10] PM / OPP: Fixes and cleanups Viresh Kumar
2016-12-06 9:15 ` [PATCH 01/10] PM / OPP: Fix memory leak while adding duplicate OPPs Viresh Kumar
2016-12-07 1:09 ` Stephen Boyd
2016-12-07 3:23 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-12-06 9:15 ` [PATCH 02/10] PM / OPP: Remove useless TODO Viresh Kumar
2016-12-07 1:10 ` Stephen Boyd
2016-12-07 3:24 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-12-06 9:15 ` [PATCH 03/10] PM / OPP: Rename _allocate_opp() to _opp_allocate() Viresh Kumar
2016-12-07 1:10 ` Stephen Boyd
2016-12-06 9:15 ` [PATCH 04/10] PM / OPP: Error out on failing to add static OPPs for v1 bindings Viresh Kumar
2016-12-07 1:17 ` Stephen Boyd
2016-12-07 3:25 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-12-07 21:13 ` Stephen Boyd
2016-12-08 3:30 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-12-08 6:39 ` Shawn Guo
2016-12-08 6:45 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-12-08 14:27 ` Shawn Guo
2016-12-08 14:47 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-12-06 9:15 ` [PATCH 05/10] PM / OPP: Add light weight _opp_free() routine Viresh Kumar
2016-12-07 1:12 ` Stephen Boyd
2016-12-06 9:15 ` [PATCH 06/10] PM / OPP: Rename and split _dev_pm_opp_remove_table() Viresh Kumar
2016-12-07 1:19 ` Stephen Boyd
2016-12-06 9:15 ` [PATCH 07/10] PM / OPP: Don't allocate OPP table from _opp_allocate() Viresh Kumar
2016-12-07 1:02 ` Stephen Boyd
2016-12-07 4:17 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-12-07 22:05 ` Stephen Boyd
2016-12-08 3:45 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-12-22 0:43 ` Stephen Boyd
2016-12-06 9:16 ` [PATCH 08/10] PM / OPP: Rename dev_pm_opp_get_suspend_opp() and return OPP rate Viresh Kumar
2016-12-07 1:21 ` Stephen Boyd
2016-12-07 4:20 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-12-06 9:16 ` [PATCH 09/10] PM / OPP: Don't expose srcu_head to register notifiers Viresh Kumar
2016-12-07 1:22 ` Stephen Boyd
2016-12-06 9:16 ` Viresh Kumar [this message]
2016-12-07 1:24 ` [PATCH 10/10] PM / OPP: Split out part of _add_opp_table() and _remove_opp_table() Stephen Boyd
2016-12-07 4:25 ` Viresh Kumar
[not found] ` <CGME20161206091647epcas4p1823f471816de0ef953123a8fbdac4b1f@epcas4p1.samsung.com>
2016-12-07 0:29 ` [PATCH 09/10] PM / OPP: Don't expose srcu_head to register notifiers MyungJoo Ham
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e46f477bcf5cfdb0a0d7642adb95bd15e89a974a.1481015522.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nm@ti.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vireshk@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).