Re: [PATCH 0/3] cpufreq/amd-pstate: A set of fixes

[Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>]

On 8/13/2024 04:51, Gautham R. Shenoy wrote:
> Hello Rafael, Viresh,
> 
> This series contains three fixes for the amd-pstate driver for 6.11.
> Could you please include it in your tree?
> 
> These patches are based on linux-pm/master with the top commit
> 7c626ce4bae1 ("Linux 6.11-rc3").
> 
> There are three patches,
> 
> 1. To fix an uninitialized variable in amd_pstate_cpu_boost_update()
>     from Dan Carpenter:
>     https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/7ff53543-6c04-48a0-8d99-7dc010b93b3a@stanley.mountain/
> 
> 2. Use topology_logical_package_id() instead of
>     topology_logical_die_id() definition of the later function has
>     changed on some AMD processors since the inclusion of the CPUID
>     0x80000026 parser:
>     https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240801124509.3650-1-Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com/
> 
> 3. Remove a warning for the absence fo X86_FEATURE_CPPC on Zen1 and
>     Zen2 since they don't have the feature defined. This fixes the
>     regression reported by David Wang:
>     https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240730140111.4491-1-00107082@163.com/
> 
> Thanks and Regards
> gautham.
> 
> Dan Carpenter (1):
>    cpufreq: amd-pstate: Fix uninitialized variable in
>      amd_pstate_cpu_boost_update()
> 
> Gautham R. Shenoy (2):
>    cpufreq/amd-pstate: Use topology_logical_package_id() instead of
>      logical_die_id()
>    cpufreq/amd-pstate: Remove warning for X86_FEATURE_CPPC on Zen1 and
>      Zen2
> 
>   drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c | 10 ++++------
>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 

Thanks for handling these.  I'm back now, I'm digging through my inbox.
Assuming Rafael didn't already pull these I'll batch these into my 
amd-pstate branch for the robots to bang on and then send a PR after I 
go through everything else that happened.