From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: Rafael Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Preeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Subject: [PATCH 03/10] cpufreq: conservative: remove 'enable' field
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 13:32:50 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e5627369b56ae3dcd00d7243e00618992c457cce.1434959517.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1434959517.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
In-Reply-To: <cover.1434959517.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Conservative governor has its own 'enable' field to check two things:
- If conservative governor is used for a CPU or not
- If governor is currently enabled or not, as there can be a race around
the notifier being called while it was getting unregistered from
cpufreq_governor_dbs().
The first one can be checked by comparing policy->governor with
'cpufreq_gov_conservative' and the second one isn't that important. In
the worst case, we will end up updating dbs_info->requested_freq. And
that wouldn't do any harm.
Lets get rid of this field.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c | 26 +++++++++++++++-----------
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c | 12 +-----------
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.h | 1 -
3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c
index 1e3cabfb2b57..f53719e5bed9 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c
@@ -23,6 +23,19 @@
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct cs_cpu_dbs_info_s, cs_cpu_dbs_info);
+static int cs_cpufreq_governor_dbs(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
+ unsigned int event);
+
+#ifndef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_DEFAULT_GOV_CONSERVATIVE
+static
+#endif
+struct cpufreq_governor cpufreq_gov_conservative = {
+ .name = "conservative",
+ .governor = cs_cpufreq_governor_dbs,
+ .max_transition_latency = TRANSITION_LATENCY_LIMIT,
+ .owner = THIS_MODULE,
+};
+
static inline unsigned int get_freq_target(struct cs_dbs_tuners *cs_tuners,
struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
{
@@ -124,7 +137,8 @@ static int dbs_cpufreq_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long val,
if (!policy)
return 0;
- if (!dbs_info->enable)
+ /* policy isn't governed by conservative governor */
+ if (policy->governor != &cpufreq_gov_conservative)
goto policy_put;
/*
@@ -371,16 +385,6 @@ static int cs_cpufreq_governor_dbs(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
return cpufreq_governor_dbs(policy, &cs_dbs_cdata, event);
}
-#ifndef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_DEFAULT_GOV_CONSERVATIVE
-static
-#endif
-struct cpufreq_governor cpufreq_gov_conservative = {
- .name = "conservative",
- .governor = cs_cpufreq_governor_dbs,
- .max_transition_latency = TRANSITION_LATENCY_LIMIT,
- .owner = THIS_MODULE,
-};
-
static int __init cpufreq_gov_dbs_init(void)
{
return cpufreq_register_governor(&cpufreq_gov_conservative);
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
index af63402a94a9..836aefd03c1b 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
@@ -463,7 +463,6 @@ static int cpufreq_governor_start(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
cdata->get_cpu_dbs_info_s(cpu);
cs_dbs_info->down_skip = 0;
- cs_dbs_info->enable = 1;
cs_dbs_info->requested_freq = policy->cur;
} else {
struct od_ops *od_ops = cdata->gov_ops;
@@ -482,9 +481,7 @@ static int cpufreq_governor_start(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
static int cpufreq_governor_stop(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
struct dbs_data *dbs_data)
{
- struct common_dbs_data *cdata = dbs_data->cdata;
- unsigned int cpu = policy->cpu;
- struct cpu_dbs_info *cdbs = cdata->get_cpu_cdbs(cpu);
+ struct cpu_dbs_info *cdbs = dbs_data->cdata->get_cpu_cdbs(policy->cpu);
struct cpu_common_dbs_info *ccdbs = cdbs->ccdbs;
/* State should be equivalent to START */
@@ -493,13 +490,6 @@ static int cpufreq_governor_stop(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
gov_cancel_work(dbs_data, policy);
- if (cdata->governor == GOV_CONSERVATIVE) {
- struct cs_cpu_dbs_info_s *cs_dbs_info =
- cdata->get_cpu_dbs_info_s(cpu);
-
- cs_dbs_info->enable = 0;
- }
-
ccdbs->policy = NULL;
mutex_destroy(&ccdbs->timer_mutex);
return 0;
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.h b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.h
index 2125c299c602..a0d24149f18c 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.h
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.h
@@ -170,7 +170,6 @@ struct cs_cpu_dbs_info_s {
struct cpu_dbs_info cdbs;
unsigned int down_skip;
unsigned int requested_freq;
- unsigned int enable:1;
};
/* Per policy Governors sysfs tunables */
--
2.4.0
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pm" in
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-22 8:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-22 8:02 [PATCH 00/10] cpufreq: governor: Further cleanups (v4.3) Viresh Kumar
2015-06-22 8:02 ` [PATCH 01/10] cpufreq: Use __func__ to print function's name Viresh Kumar
2015-06-23 15:39 ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-06-22 8:02 ` [PATCH 02/10] cpufreq: conservative: Avoid races with transition notifier Viresh Kumar
2015-06-23 15:53 ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-06-24 1:11 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-06-25 7:59 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-06-22 8:02 ` Viresh Kumar [this message]
2015-06-26 5:57 ` [PATCH 03/10] cpufreq: conservative: remove 'enable' field Preeti U Murthy
2015-06-26 6:19 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-06-22 8:02 ` [PATCH 04/10] cpufreq: ondemand: only queue canceled works from update_sampling_rate() Viresh Kumar
2015-06-26 6:50 ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-06-26 7:28 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-06-22 8:02 ` [PATCH 05/10] cpufreq: governor: Drop __gov_queue_work() Viresh Kumar
2015-06-26 7:03 ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-06-26 7:32 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-06-22 8:02 ` [PATCH 06/10] cpufreq: ondemand: Drop unnecessary locks from update_sampling_rate() Viresh Kumar
2015-06-26 7:20 ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-06-22 8:02 ` [PATCH 07/10] cpufreq: ondemand: queue work for policy->cpus together Viresh Kumar
2015-06-26 8:28 ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-06-26 8:52 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-06-22 8:02 ` [PATCH 08/10] cpufreq: ondemand: update sampling rate immidiately Viresh Kumar
2015-06-22 8:02 ` [PATCH 09/10] cpufreq: governor: Quit work-handlers early if governor is stopped Viresh Kumar
2015-06-22 8:02 ` [PATCH 10/10] cpufreq: Get rid of ->governor_enabled and its lock Viresh Kumar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e5627369b56ae3dcd00d7243e00618992c457cce.1434959517.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).